Reliability of IBP Criteria & Activity Scores in Patients With AxSpA

Axial Spondyloarthritis Clinical Trial

— IBP/AxSpA  

Official title:

Reliability of Inflammatory Back Pain Criteria and Activity Scores in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05327140
• Other study ID #: ZU-IRB #6983/13-6-2021
• Status: Completed
• Start date: August 20, 2021
• Est. completion date: May 25, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: January 2023
• Source: Zagazig University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The current ASAS classification of AxSpA relies either on sacroiliitis on imaging plus one SpA feature (imaging arm) or HLA-B27 antigen plus two SpA features (clinical arm), in a patient with chronic back pain and age at onset of less than 45 years. IBP which is a major symptom of SpA depends more on patient's perception which is not usually accurate. As well, disease activity is measured by ASDAS, BASDAI, and BASFAI which depend more on subjective measures. Assessment of reliability of IBP criteria, ASDAS, BASDAI, and BASFAI in diagnosis and evaluation of activity of AxSpA is essential for better health care.

Description:

Axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the axial skeleton mainly leading to significant pain and disability. Early diagnosis of AxSpA is important for better management of symptoms and to limit spinal damage. The last classification of AxSpA is ASAS classification criteria which relies either on sacroiliitis on imaging plus one SpA feature (imaging arm) or HLA-B27 antigen plus two SpA features (clinical arm), in a patient with chronic back pain and age at onset of less than 45 years. Inflammatory back pain (IBP) is the key clinical symptom of AxSpA and is often present at disease onset. There are different sets of IBP criteria which include the Calin criteria , Berlin criteria, and the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) IBP experts criteria. These sets when assessed by different rheumatologists had different sensitivity and specificity. As IBP has certain characters, taking the clinical history has been considered as a screening test for patients with chronic back pain to identify patients with AxSpA. But, the value of this screening test has been questioned. Disease activity in AxSpA has been measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). It has been used extensively since 1994 but with some limitations as it does not include the physician's assessment of the disease and does not assess the impact of specific clinical factors. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) has been also developed as an approach to defining and monitoring functional ability in patients with AxSpA. ASAS developed a disease activity score for patient with AxSpA which is called Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) that combines patient-reported assessments with acute phase reactants (C-reactive protein [CRP] or erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). However, it is based largely on subjective measures, and lacks objective biomarker of disease activity. The evaluation of disease activity in AxSpA is complex and multifactorial. Also, patients and physicians have different perspectives of the disease and none of the current single-item or combined indexes adequately unifies both perspectives.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 206
• Est. completion date: May 25, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: February 22, 2022
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Group 1
• Patients diagnosed as AxSpA.
• Age > 18 years and < 45 years at onset of the disease. Group 2
• Patients diagnosed as chronic mechanical back pain.
• Age > 18 years and < 45 years at onset of the disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients having acute or subacute back pain.
• Patients having back pain referred from another site.
• Patients with any other autoimmune disease: rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Behçet's disease… etc.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Axial Spondyloarthritis
• Back Pain
• Inflammatory Back Pain
• Spondylarthritis
• Spondylitis

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Zagazig university	Zagazig	Sharqia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Zagazig University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (12)

Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O'Hea J, Mallorie P, Jenkinson T. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2281-5. — View Citation

Calin A, Porta J, Fries JF, Schurman DJ. Clinical history as a screening test for ankylosing spondylitis. JAMA. 1977 Jun 13;237(24):2613-4. — View Citation

Deodhar A, Blanco R, Dokoupilova E, Hall S, Kameda H, Kivitz AJ, Poddubnyy D, van de Sande M, Wiksten AS, Porter BO, Richards HB, Haemmerle S, Braun J. Improvement of Signs and Symptoms of Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in Patients Treated With Secukinumab: Primary Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Jan;73(1):110-120. doi: 10.1002/art.41477. Epub 2020 Nov 24. — View Citation

Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286-91. — View Citation

Machado P, van der Heijde D. How to measure disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis? Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;23(4):339-45. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283470f23. — View Citation

Poddubnyy D, Callhoff J, Spiller I, Listing J, Braun J, Sieper J, Rudwaleit M. Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory back pain for axial spondyloarthritis in rheumatological care. RMD Open. 2018 Dec 5;4(2):e000825. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000825. eCollection 2018. — View Citation

Reveille JD. Biomarkers for diagnosis, monitoring of progression, and treatment responses in ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;34(6):1009-18. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-2949-3. Epub 2015 May 5. — View Citation

Ritchlin C, Adamopoulos IE. Axial spondyloarthritis: new advances in diagnosis and management. BMJ. 2021 Jan 4;372:m4447. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4447. — View Citation

Rudwaleit M, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Listing J, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Collantes-Estevez E, Davis J, Dijkmans B, Dougados M, Emery P, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Inman R, Khan MA, Leirisalo-Repo M, van der Linden S, Maksymowych WP, Mielants H, Olivieri I, Sturrock R, de Vlam K, Sieper J. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part I): classification of paper patients by expert opinion including uncertainty appraisal. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):770-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.108217. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Erratum In: Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Aug;70(8):1519. — View Citation

Rudwaleit M, Metter A, Listing J, Sieper J, Braun J. Inflammatory back pain in ankylosing spondylitis: a reassessment of the clinical history for application as classification and diagnostic criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Feb;54(2):569-78. doi: 10.1002/art.21619. — View Citation

Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Brandt J, Burgos-Vagas R, Collantes-Estevez E, Dijkmans B, Dougados M, Khan MA, Leirisalo-Repo M, van der Linden S, Maksymowych WP, Mielants H, Olivieri I, Rudwaleit M. New criteria for inflammatory back pain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):784-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101501. Epub 2009 Jan 15. — View Citation

van der Heijde D, Lie E, Kvien TK, Sieper J, Van den Bosch F, Listing J, Braun J, Landewe R; Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). ASDAS, a highly discriminatory ASAS-endorsed disease activity score in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1811-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.100826. Epub 2008 Dec 5. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	assessment of reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of inflammatory back pain criteria (the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society IBP experts criteria) depending on a gold standard which is the global evaluation of the rheumatologist.	Assessment of reliability of each item and the whole set of inflammatory back pain criteria ( the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) IBP experts criteria) depending on a gold standard which is the global evaluation of expert rheumatologist: is it inflammatory or mechanical back pain.; The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) IBP experts criteria includes 5 items: age at onset = 40 years, insidious onset, improvement with exercise, no improvement with rest, pain at night. This set of criteria is achieved if at least four parameters are met.	8/2021 to 5/2022
Primary	assessment of reliability of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score in axial spondyloarthritis patients.	Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS-CRP) includes 4 questions about disease activity (Axial pain, Peripheral Pain/Swelling, Duration of Morning Stiffness, activity of the disease on average during the last week) and CRP. Each question has a score from 0 to 10. 0 means no, and 10 means sever.; ASDAS_CRP = 0.121 × total back pain + 0.110 × patient global + 0.073 × peripheral pain / swelling + 0.058 × duration of morning stiffness + 0.579 × Ln (CRP+1).; ASDAS scores : <1.3 "inactive disease" and <2.1"low disease activity", =3.5 "high disease activity", and >3.5 "very high disease activity".; The score is applied to the same group of patients by 2 rheumatologists. The scores of each question and the total score that detected by the two rheumatologists are compared to detect agreement between the two rheumatologist and assess reliability of this score	8/2021 to 5/2022