Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03445845
Other study ID # 1608185
Secondary ID 2017-004700-22
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date December 14, 2018
Est. completion date November 2025

Study information

Verified date June 2023
Source Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Contact Hubert MAROTTE, MD
Phone 04 77 12 76 49
Email hubert.marotte@chu-st-etienne.fr
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by inflammatory arthritis and enthesitis involving the spine. AxSpA prevalence is around 0.17% of the French population. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) was the first target defined in axSpA. Since one third of axSpA patients failed to the first TNF blocker, many axSpA patients received a second biological Disease-Modifying AntiRheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs). Until few months, the only choice was to use a second TNF blocker.Since 2003, pharmaceutical companies investigated efficacy of TNF blockers already used in rheumatoid arthritis. Etanercept is a fusion protein with TNF receptor type II p75 and IgG1 Fc fragment, whereas adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab are monoclonal antibodies. Certolizumab is a fusion between a fab fragment targeting TNF and a Peg fraction. All demonstrated efficacy versus placebo in a randomized double blinded study In case of failure to the first TNF blockers, rheumatologists will follow the "Treat-to-Target" principle. This approach already demonstrated its benefit in rheumatoid arthritis or in psoriatic arthritis. This concept was also suggested for axSpA with low levels of evidence and recommendation. So rheumatologist will provide the best treatment in case of failure to the first TNF blockers, which is a daily clinical situation. Since few months, rheumatologists have the choice between targeting IL-23/17 axis compared to a second TNF blocker.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 300
Est. completion date November 2025
Est. primary completion date November 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Active axSPA with BASDAI>4 or ASDAS>3.5, who need change in TNF blocker treatment - Aged over 18 years - Inadequate response after at least 3 months to the 1st TNF blocker - If non biologic DMARD treatment : stable dose for at least on month before inclusion - If oral corticosteroids treatment : stable dose for at least on month before inclusion - If NSAIDs treatment : stable dose for at least on month before inclusion - Ability to complete questionnaires - Social security affiliation - Informed written consent given Exclusion Criteria: - Any contra-indication to TNF blocker and/or secukinumab - Inflammatory bowel diseases - Existing pregnancy, lactation, or intended pregnancy within the next 15 months Active tuberculosis or other severe infections such as sepsis or opportunistic infections - Active infections, including chronic or localised infections. - Moderate to severe heart failure (NYHA classes III/IV) - Impossibility to give informed consent - Impossibility to be followed for 12 months

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Secukinumab
Secukinumab : 150 mg per week for 5 weeks, and then every month by subcutaneous injection
TNF blocker
TNF blocker (originator or biosimilar) : infliximab: 5mg/kg per IV infusion at weeks 0, 2, 6, and then every 6 weeks, etanercept: 50mg per week in subcutaneous injection, adalimumab: 40mg every other week in subcutaneous injection, certolizumab: 400mg every other week 3 times, and then 200mg every other week or 400mg per month in subcutaneous injections, golimumab: 50mg every month in subcutaneous injection, in case of overweight (>100kg) an inadequate response, 100mg every month is allow.
Biological:
blood specimen
Blood specimen at each visits for measurement of bDMARS blockers concentration and anti-drug antibody concentration

Locations

Country Name City State
France CHU d'Angers Angers
France CHRU Besançon Besançon
France APHP- Hôpital Avicenne Bobigny
France CHU Bordeaux Bordeau
France CHRU Brest Brest
France CHU Clermont-Ferrand Clermont-Ferrand
France CHU de Grenoble Alpes Grenoble
France CHD Vendée La Roche-sur-Yon
France CH Le Mans Le Mans
France CHRU Lille Lille
France Hôpital Saint-Philibert Lomme
France CH Lyon SUD Lyon
France Hôpital Edouard Herriot Lyon
France CHRU Montpellier Montpellier
France CHU Montpellier - 2 - Unité Clinique thérapeutique des Maladies Ostéo-Articulaires Montpellier
France CHU Nancy Nancy
France CHU de Nantes Nantes
France CHU de Nice Nice
France CHR d'Orléans Orléans
France APHP - Hôpital Ambroise Paré Paris
France APHP - Hôpital Bichat Paris
France APHP - Hôpital Cochin Paris
France APHP - Hôpital Henri Mondor Paris
France APHP - Hôpital Lariboisière Paris
France APHP - Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière Paris
France APHP - Hôpital Saint-Antoine Paris
France APHP - Kremlin-Bicêtre Paris
France CHU de Poitiers Poitiers
France CHU Reims Reims
France CHU de Rouen Rouen
France CHU Saint-Etienne Saint-Étienne
France CHU STRASBOURG - Hautepierre Strasbourg
France CHU Toulouse Toulouse
France CHRU Tours Tours
Monaco CH Princesse de Grace Monaco

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne Ministry of Health, France

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

France,  Monaco, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Proportion of axSpA patients with a clinical response Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Society 40 (ASAS 40) at week 24 ASAS 40 is defined as an improvement of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a numerical rating scale of 10 in at least 3 of the following domains compared to values at inclusion:
Patient global assessment : numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "none" and "severe."
Pain assessment : average of total and nocturnal pain scores, both measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "no pain" and "most severe pain."
Function : BASFI average of 10 questions measured by numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "easy" and "impossible."
Morning stiffness, represented by the average of the last 2 questions on the 6-question BASDAI measured by numerical rating scale: one with extremes labelled "none" and "very severe"; the other marking duration of morning stiffness between "0" and "2 or more hours." Additionally, no worsening at all in remaining domain
24 weks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a clinical response ASAS 40 at week 12 ASAS 40 is defined as an improvement of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a numerical rating scale of 10 in at least 3 of the following domains compared to values at inclusion:
Patient global assessment : numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "none" and "severe."
Pain assessment : average of total and nocturnal pain scores, both measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "no pain" and "most severe pain."
Function : BASFI average of 10 questions measured by numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "easy" and "impossible."
Morning stiffness, represented by the average of the last 2 questions on the 6-question BASDAI measured by numerical rating scale: one with extremes labelled "none" and "very severe"; the other marking duration of morning stiffness between "0" and "2 or more hours." Additionally, no worsening at all in remaining domain
12 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a clinical response ASAS 40 at week 52 ASAS 40 is defined as an improvement of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a numerical rating scale of 10 in at least 3 of the following domains compared to values at inclusion:
Patient global assessment : numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "none" and "severe."
Pain assessment : average of total and nocturnal pain scores, both measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "no pain" and "most severe pain."
Function : BASFI average of 10 questions measured by numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "easy" and "impossible."
Morning stiffness, represented by the average of the last 2 questions on the 6-question BASDAI measured by numerical rating scale: one with extremes labelled "none" and "very severe"; the other marking duration of morning stiffness between "0" and "2 or more hours." Additionally, no worsening at all in remaining domain
52 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a clinical response ASAS 20 at week 12 ASAS 20 is defined as an improvement of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a numerical rating scale of 10 in at least 3 of the following domains compared to values at inclusion:
Patient global assessment : numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "none" and "severe."
Pain assessment : average of total and nocturnal pain scores, both measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "no pain" and "most severe pain."
Function : BASFI average of 10 questions regarding measured by numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "easy" and "impossible."
Morning stiffness, represented by the average of the last 2 questions on the 6-question BASDAI measured by numerical rating scale: one with extremes labelled "none" and "very severe"; the other marking duration of morning stiffness between "0" and "2 or more hours." Additionally, no worsening in a similar amount in the fourth domain
52 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a clinical response ASAS 20 at week 24 ASAS 20 is defined as an improvement of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a numerical rating scale of 10 in at least 3 of the following domains compared to values at inclusion:
Patient global assessment : numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "none" and "severe."
Pain assessment : average of total and nocturnal pain scores, both measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "no pain" and "most severe pain."
Function : BASFI average of 10 questions regarding measured by numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "easy" and "impossible."
Morning stiffness, represented by the average of the last 2 questions on the 6-question BASDAI measured by numerical rating scale: one with extremes labelled "none" and "very severe"; the other marking duration of morning stiffness between "0" and "2 or more hours." Additionally, no worsening in a similar amount in the fourth domain
24 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a clinical response ASAS20 at week 52 ASAS 20 is defined as an improvement of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a numerical rating scale of 10 in at least 3 of the following domains compared to values at inclusion:
Patient global assessment : numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "none" and "severe."
Pain assessment : average of total and nocturnal pain scores, both measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "no pain" and "most severe pain."
Function : BASFI average of 10 questions regarding measured by numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "easy" and "impossible."
Morning stiffness, represented by the average of the last 2 questions on the 6-question BASDAI measured by numerical rating scale: one with extremes labelled "none" and "very severe"; the other marking duration of morning stiffness between "0" and "2 or more hours." Additionally, no worsening in a similar amount in the fourth domain
52 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a partial remission rate at week 12 Partial remission is defined by values lower than 2/10 in each 4 domains:
Patient global assessment measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "none" and "severe."
Pain assessment represented by the average of total and nocturnal pain scores, both measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "no pain" and "most severe pain."
Function represented by BASFI average of 10 questions regarding ability to perform specific tasks as measured by numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "easy" and "impossible."
Morning stiffness, represented by the average of the last 2 questions on the 6-question BASDAI regarding morning stiffness as measured by numerical rating scale: one with extremes labelled "none" and "very severe"; the other marking duration of morning stiffness between "0" and "2 or more hours."
12 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a partial remission rate at week 24 Partial remission is defined by values lower than 2/10 in each 4 domains:
Patient global assessment measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "none" and "severe."
Pain assessment represented by the average of total and nocturnal pain scores, both measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "no pain" and "most severe pain."
Function represented by BASFI average of 10 questions regarding ability to perform specific tasks as measured by numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "easy" and "impossible."
Morning stiffness, represented by the average of the last 2 questions on the 6-question BASDAI regarding morning stiffness as measured by numerical rating scale: one with extremes labelled "none" and "very severe"; the other marking duration of morning stiffness between "0" and "2 or more hours."
24 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a partial remission rate at week 52 Partial remission is defined by values lower than 2/10 in each 4 domains:
Patient global assessment measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "none" and "severe."
Pain assessment represented by the average of total and nocturnal pain scores, both measured on a numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "no pain" and "most severe pain."
Function represented by BASFI average of 10 questions regarding ability to perform specific tasks as measured by numerical rating scale with extremes labelled "easy" and "impossible."
Morning stiffness, represented by the average of the last 2 questions on the 6-question BASDAI regarding morning stiffness as measured by numerical rating scale: one with extremes labelled "none" and "very severe"; the other marking duration of morning stiffness between "0" and "2 or more hours."
52 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a ASDAS major improvement at week 12 ASDAS major improvement was defined by a variation of ASDAS-CRP=2 12 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a ASDAS major improvement at week 24 ASDAS major improvement was defined by a variation of ASDAS-CRP=2 24 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with a ASDAS major improvement at week 52 ASDAS major improvement was defined by a variation of ASDAS-CRP=2 52 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with biological Disease-Modifying AntiRheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) treatment at week 12 Patient with the same bDAMRs treatment at inclusion and week 12 12 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with biological Disease-Modifying AntiRheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) treatment at week 24 Patient with the same biological Disease-Modifying AntiRheumatic Drug (bDAMR) treatment at inclusion and week 24 24 weeks
Secondary Proportion of axSpA patients with bDMARDs treatment at week 52 Patient with the same biological Disease-Modifying AntiRheumatic Drug (bDAMR) treatment at inclusion and week 52 52 weeks
Secondary Number of adverse events Number of adverse events 52 weeks
Secondary Correlation between concentration of antibodies to bDMARS blockers and clinical response according to treatment Concentration of antibodies to bDMARS blockers is measured by Enzyme Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA) low disease activity is defined by BASDAI <4 and ASDAS <2.1 From baseline to 52 weeks
Secondary Correlation between concentration of anti-drug antibodies and clinical response according to treatment Concentration of anti-drug antibodies is measured by Enzyme Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA) low disease activity is defined by BASDAI <4 and ASDAS <2.1 From baseline to 52 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05031767 - Remote Monitoring of Axial Spondyloarthritis N/A
Completed NCT05162937 - to Evaluate the Preliminary Efficacy and Safety of GR1501 Injection in Patients With Active Axial Spondyloarthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT03622658 - Efficacy and Safety of Namilumab for Moderate-to-severe Axial Spondyloarthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT03248518 - Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases N/A
Terminated NCT02437162 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Anti-TNFα Naive Participants With Active Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Phase 3
Enrolling by invitation NCT06072859 - The Impact of Simulated Forest Immersion Therapy on Pain and Anxiety in Patients Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) N/A
Completed NCT02552212 - Multicenter Study Evaluating Certolizumab Pegol Compared to Placebo in Subjects With axSpA Without X-ray Evidence of AS Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT01944163 - The IMPACT of a Referral Model for Axial Spondyloarthritis in Young Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02687620 - Does Immunogenicity Have an Influence on the Efficacy of Anti-TNF Therapy in Patients With AS: An Inception Cohort Study
Completed NCT00844805 - Infliximab for Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis (P05336 AM1) Phase 3
Terminated NCT02897115 - A Study Treating Participants With Early Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) Taking an Intense Treatment Approach Versus Routine Treatment Phase 4
Completed NCT05019547 - The Turkish Version of the Inflammatory Arthritis Facilitators and Barriers to Physical Activity
Recruiting NCT03738956 - Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib in the Treatment of NSAID Refractory Axial Spondyloarthritis:A Clinical Trial Phase 2/Phase 3
Enrolling by invitation NCT02962479 - Is the Human Microbiome Altered in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis? N/A
Completed NCT04485078 - Investigation of Central Sensitization Frequency and Related Factors in Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients
Recruiting NCT05812157 - Optimizing Anti-IL17 Antibody Therapy by Associating Fiber Supplementation to Correct Treatment-aggravated Gut Dysbiosis in Axial Spondyloarthritis - RESPOND-IL17 N/A
Completed NCT03039088 - PREDICT-SpA - French Epidemiological Study of the Evaluation of the Impact of Fibromyalgia in the TNF Alpha Treatment Effect in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Both Anti-TNF naïve and - Experienced Patients
Completed NCT04368494 - Exercise Therapy in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis N/A
Completed NCT03270501 - Efficacy of Golimumab in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis in Relation to Gut Inflammation Phase 3
Completed NCT03043846 - Treat to Target Trial in Axial Spondylo Arthritis : The TICOSPA (Tight Control in Spondyloarthritis)