Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinical Trial
Official title:
Right Lateralized Posterior Cerebellar tDCS in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
The purpose of this research study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on some of the challenges faced by children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | June 30, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 5 Years to 21 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Ages 5 to 21, male and female, with known autism spectrum disorder as diagnosed by a clinician Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy - Brain implants - Pacemakers - Any biomedical or metal implants in any part of body - Hearing or visual impairment - History of brain injury - Known brain or skull abnormality other than those that may be associated with ASD |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | UT Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Social behavior as measured by Reading the Mind in the Eyes (RME) Child Version | Reading the Mind in the Eyes (RME) Child Version will be used to measure complex mental state recognition. This test consists of 28 photographs of the eye region of the human face, each surrounded by four words. Participants pick the word that best describes what the person in the photo is thinking or feeling. Scores range from 0-28, higher score indicates very accurate at decoding a person's facial expressions around their eyes. | Baseline | |
Primary | Social behavior as measured by Reading the Mind in the Eyes (RME) Child Version | Reading the Mind in the Eyes (RME) Child Version will be used to measure complex mental state recognition. This test consists of 28 photographs of the eye region of the human face, each surrounded by four words. Participants pick the word that best describes what the person in the photo is thinking or feeling. Scores range from 0-28, higher score indicates very accurate at decoding a person's facial expressions around their eyes. | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) | |
Primary | Social behavior as measured by Cyberball/Social Ball Throwing Task | Cyberball/Social Ball Throwing Task will be used to measure social interaction. In this task, the participant engaged in a virtual ball throwing game with two other players. There are three conditions the participants will be randomly assigned to. In two conditions participants are thrown the ball an equal number of times, in the other condition the participant is only thrown the ball a few times. After the participant completes the task, they are given a rating scale to rate how well they trust and prefer the other two players on a scale from 1-7 (totally mistrust to totally trust). The ratings indicated how well the subject was able to determine if they were left out of the group" | Baseline | |
Primary | Social behavior as measured by Cyberball/Social Ball Throwing Task | Cyberball/Social Ball Throwing Task will be used to measure social interaction. In this task, the participant engaged in a virtual ball throwing game with two other players. There are three conditions the participants will be randomly assigned to. In two conditions participants are thrown the ball an equal number of times, in the other condition the participant is only thrown the ball a few times. After the participant completes the task, they are given a rating scale to rate how well they trust and prefer the other two players on a scale from 1-7 (totally mistrust to totally trust). The ratings indicated how well the subject was able to determine if they were left out of the group" | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) | |
Primary | Sensorimotor behavior as measured by Grip Strength | Participants grip a specially designed fiber optic device (Aither Engineering, Inc.). This device detects nanometer changes in grip force which are calibrated in Newtons. Participants are instructed to rest their arm in a relaxed position. Subjects use their thumb and index finger to press against grip device. Prior to testing, each subject will complete the maximum voluntary contraction for each hand during trials of 3 seconds each with 15 seconds in between each trial. The subject is then instructed to press as hard as they can when the screen says "go" using only the thumb and pointer finger. | Baseline | |
Primary | Sensorimotor behavior as measured by Grip Strength | Participants grip a specially designed fiber optic device (Aither Engineering, Inc.). This device detects nanometer changes in grip force which are calibrated in Newtons. Participants are instructed to rest their arm in a relaxed position. Subjects use their thumb and index finger to press against grip device. Prior to testing, each subject will complete the maximum voluntary contraction for each hand during trials of 3 seconds each with 15 seconds in between each trial. The subject is then instructed to press as hard as they can when the screen says "go" using only the thumb and pointer finger. | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) | |
Primary | Sensorimotor behavior as measured by Reach Task | Participants will be positioned at a table with reaching arm resting on the table in a neutral position. The task includes picking up small objects placed on the table and placing the objects one by one into a target container in two trials: preferred and non-preferred hands. The task is rated on a 6-point rating scale, where 5 represents weakest performance, and 0 represents best performance. Each item is given a raw score and a standard score, which translate to a component score and percentile rank. | Baseline | |
Primary | Sensorimotor behavior as measured by Reach Task | Participants will be positioned at a table with reaching arm resting on the table in a neutral position. The task includes picking up small objects placed on the table and placing the objects one by one into a target container in two trials: preferred and non-preferred hands. The task is rated on a 6-point rating scale, where 5 represents weakest performance, and 0 represents best performance. Each item is given a raw score and a standard score, which translate to a component score and percentile rank. | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) | |
Primary | Sensorimotor behavior as measured by Sensory Profile-2 | A parent self-report form designed to assess sensory processing patterns in children and adolescents. The report includes three subscales: sensory system, behavior, and sensory pattern.Each item is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1=Much Less Than Others, 2=Less Than Others, 3=Just Like the Majority of Others, 4=More Than Others, 5=Much More Than Others). Raw scores are totaled and converted to percentile ranks based on participant age. | Baseline | |
Primary | Sensorimotor behavior as measured by Sensory Profile-2 | A parent self-report form designed to assess sensory processing patterns in children and adolescents. The report includes three subscales: sensory system, behavior, and sensory pattern.Each item is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1=Much Less Than Others, 2=Less Than Others, 3=Just Like the Majority of Others, 4=More Than Others, 5=Much More Than Others). Raw scores are totaled and converted to percentile ranks based on participant age. | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) | |
Primary | Neurophysiological impacts as measured by Magnetoencephalography (MEG) | MEG data will be processed using AFNI (https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/). Using all channels of the MEG data, strength and latency of responses are measured by transforming each subject's raw MEG activity into brain space. A spatial filter is applied which separates the source activity from different brain regions to observe overlap at the sensor level. This analysis will assess functional connectivity between the region of interest (ROI) voxel, the right Crus I of the cerebellum, compared to all other voxels in the brain. Seed-based voxel correlation analysis enables researchers to see the statistical correlation between the ROI activity and activity in other cortical areas. This correlation reveals patterns of connectivity between the ROI and other cortical regions. The second level analysis will utilize a one-way ANOVAs will compare baseline measures (Cyberball, Precision Grip) and demographics (e.g. age) within groups. The within subjects' effect of tDCS on task scores will be evaluated | Baseline | |
Primary | Neurophysiological impacts as measured by Magnetoencephalography (MEG) | MEG data will be processed using AFNI (https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/). Using all channels of the MEG data, strength and latency of responses are measured by transforming each subject's raw MEG activity into brain space. A spatial filter is applied which separates the source activity from different brain regions to observe overlap at the sensor level. This analysis will assess functional connectivity between the region of interest (ROI) voxel, the right Crus I of the cerebellum, compared to all other voxels in the brain. Seed-based voxel correlation analysis enables researchers to see the statistical correlation between the ROI activity and activity in other cortical areas. This correlation reveals patterns of connectivity between the ROI and other cortical regions. The second level analysis will utilize a one-way ANOVAs will compare baseline measures (Cyberball, Precision Grip) and demographics (e.g. age) within groups. The within subjects' effect of tDCS on task scores will be evaluated | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) | |
Primary | Neurophysiological impacts as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) | fMRI data will be processed using AFNI (https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/). A regression analyses is used (3dDeconvolve and 3dREML) for each subject. Data collected from MRI acquisition will be analyzed at two levels. The first level of analysis will use seed-based voxel correlational analysis, a statistical technique for observing differences in brain activity. This analysis will assess functional connectivity between the region of interest (ROI) voxel, the right Crus I of the cerebellum, compared to all other voxels in the brain. Seed-based voxel correlation analysis enables researchers to see the statistical correlation between the ROI activity and activity in other cortical areas. This correlation reveals patterns of connectivity between the ROI and other cortical regions. The second level analysis will utilize a one-way ANOVAs will compare baseline measures (Cyberball, Precision Grip) and demographics (e.g. age) within groups. | Baseline | |
Primary | Neurophysiological impacts as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) | fMRI data will be processed using AFNI (https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/). A regression analyses is used (3dDeconvolve and 3dREML) for each subject. Data collected from MRI acquisition will be analyzed at two levels. The first level of analysis will use seed-based voxel correlational analysis, a statistical technique for observing differences in brain activity. This analysis will assess functional connectivity between the region of interest (ROI) voxel, the right Crus I of the cerebellum, compared to all other voxels in the brain. Seed-based voxel correlation analysis enables researchers to see the statistical correlation between the ROI activity and activity in other cortical areas. This correlation reveals patterns of connectivity between the ROI and other cortical regions. The second level analysis will utilize a one-way ANOVAs will compare baseline measures (Cyberball, Precision Grip) and demographics (e.g. age) within groups. | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) | |
Secondary | Executive functioning as measured by Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention | The NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test measures both a participant's attention and inhibitory control. Accuracy and reaction scores range in value between 0 and 5. If accuracy scores for the participant reach more than 80%, the reaction time score and accuracy score are combined. Combined scores range in value from 0-10. This score shows how accurate and how quickly the subject responded, the high the score the more accurate and quickly each subject responded. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Executive functioning as measured by Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention | The NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test measures both a participant's attention and inhibitory control. Accuracy and reaction scores range in value between 0 and 5. If accuracy scores for the participant reach more than 80%, the reaction time score and accuracy score are combined. Combined scores range in value from 0-10. This score shows how accurate and how quickly the subject responded, the high the score the more accurate and quickly each subject responded. | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) | |
Secondary | Executive functioning as measured by Dimensional Card Change Sort | The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) is a measure of cognitive flexibility, also known as task switching or set shifting. Scoring is based on a combination of accuracy and reaction time. Accuracy and reaction scores range in value between 0 and 5. If accuracy scores for the participant reach more than 80%, the reaction time score and accuracy score are combined. Combined scores range in value from 0-10. This score shows how accurate and how quickly the subject responded, the high the score the more accurate and quickly each subject responded. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Executive functioning as measured by Dimensional Card Change Sort | The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) is a measure of cognitive flexibility, also known as task switching or set shifting. Scoring is based on a combination of accuracy and reaction time. Accuracy and reaction scores range in value between 0 and 5. If accuracy scores for the participant reach more than 80%, the reaction time score and accuracy score are combined. Combined scores range in value from 0-10. This score shows how accurate and how quickly the subject responded, the high the score the more accurate and quickly each subject responded. | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) | |
Secondary | Working memory as measured by Stanford Binet-V Working Memory Subtest | Stanford Binet-V Working Memory Subtest assesses how well the subject recalls facts and objects. This area assesses how well the subject recalls facts and objects. At lower levels, the non-verbal test involves asking the subject to find an object hidden under a cup, or block tapping in which the subject must repeat a sequence of tapping on blocks initiated by the examiner. The verbal test requires the subject to recall the last words of several sentences in a series. Raw scores are the total number of items correct and are converted into standard scores (0-119) for each subtest based on participant age. Standard scores of 100-110 are considered average for the subjects age range | Baseline | |
Secondary | Working memory as measured by Stanford Binet-V Working Memory Subtest | Stanford Binet-V Working Memory Subtest assesses how well the subject recalls facts and objects. This area assesses how well the subject recalls facts and objects. At lower levels, the non-verbal test involves asking the subject to find an object hidden under a cup, or block tapping in which the subject must repeat a sequence of tapping on blocks initiated by the examiner. The verbal test requires the subject to recall the last words of several sentences in a series. Raw scores are the total number of items correct and are converted into standard scores (0-119) for each subtest based on participant age. Standard scores of 100-110 are considered average for the subjects age range | Post Treatment (approx at 3 month) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05207956 -
App for Strengthening Services In Specialized Therapeutic Support
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03286621 -
Development of Eye-tracking Based Markers for Autism in Young Children
|
||
Completed |
NCT02608333 -
Efficiency of Early Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05935722 -
Evaluation of a Home-based Parenting Support Program: Parenting Young Children
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06259539 -
A YouTube Curriculum for Children With Autism and Obesity
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06303791 -
Digital-based Psychosocial Intervention for Parents of Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05017779 -
A Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Trial of a High School-based Executive Function Treatment for Autistic Youth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04772898 -
Effectiveness of a 6-week Hippotherapy Program in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04987541 -
The Therapeutic Effect of TBS Stimulation on Emotion Regulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04308915 -
Mobile-based Games for Cognitive Training in Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06038435 -
The Effect of Cognitive Orientation Approach on Daily Occupational Performance With Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04049981 -
Investigation of Mechanisms of Action in Superpower Glass
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03693313 -
The Effect of CrossFit Kids on Social Skills in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder (CrossFit KAMP)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04107064 -
Achieving Steady Work Among Adults With Autism Through Specialized Employment Program
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03812068 -
Parent-mediated Developmental Behavioral Intervention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03206996 -
Exposure Therapy for Auditory Sensitivity in Autism
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02299700 -
Study to Evaluate the Janssen Autism Knowledge Engine in Children and Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03422016 -
Electroretinogram in Autistic Spectrum Disorders
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03548779 -
North Carolina Genomic Evaluation by Next-generation Exome Sequencing, 2
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05114538 -
Improving the Part C Early Intervention Service Delivery System for Children With ASD
|
N/A |