Heart Rate Variability After Ablation

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Pulsed-field catheter ablation is a promising new treatment method for patients with atrial fibrillation. The mechanism of cell damage here is different from that of classic catheter ablation, in which the ganglion plexuses around the pulmonary veins are also damaged and thus changes in the autonomic nervous system occur. The aim of the work is to find out, using heart rate variability, whether the autonomic system is less affected during pulsed field ablation than in classic radiofrequency ablation.

Clinical Trial Description

Catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most effective treatment method for atrial fibrillation (AF). For a long time, radiofrequency energy (RFA) was dominantly used for ablation, which leads to tissue heating and thus thermal damage. The methodology of pulsed-field ablation, or irreversible electroporation, has been completely newly developed. This form of energy does not lead to thermal tissue damage (as is the case with radiofrequency energy), but with the help of high-intensity nanopulses of electrical energy, the ion channels of cardiomyocytes are permanently opened, the concentration gradient of ions is canceled and thus their irreversible destruction. In addition to the electrical isolation of the pulmonary vein, standard radiofrequency isolation of the pulmonary veins leads to the ablation of collateral ganglion plexuses and thus to the influence of the autonomic nervous system. This is very positive, an imbalance between sympathetic and parasympathetic innervating the left atrium is considered a risk factor for AF induction, and its damage with standard RFA is considered part of the RFA ablation effect. Available studies suggest that PFA probably induces significantly weaker and less permanent suppression of cardiac autonomic regulation compared to RF energy used for PVI. Measuring heart rate variability is a simple non-invasive method. A regular ECG Holter recorder can be used for the measurement. Patients will be fitted with a 24-hour Holter ECG on admission to determine the original heart rate variability. Catheter ablation will take place the next day. Patients will be treated using one of two methods of pulmonary vein isolation - RFA or PFA. One month after the catheterization procedure, a 24-hour Holter ECG will be used again to detect changes in HRV compared to preoperative values. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06276296
Study type	Observational
Source	Charles University, Czech Republic
Contact	Jana Vesela, Ph.D.
Phone	+420267162714
Email	janca.zd@gmail.com
Status	Recruiting
Phase
Start date	March 1, 2023
Completion date	October 1, 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT05654272` - Development of CIRC Technologies
Completed	`NCT04571385` - A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of AP30663 for Cardioversion in Participants With Atrial Fibrillation (AF)	Phase 2
Terminated	`NCT04115735` - His Bundle Recording From Subclavian Vein
Completed	`NCT05366803` - Women's Health Initiative Silent Atrial Fibrillation Recording Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT02864758` - Benefit-Risk Of Arterial THrombotic prEvention With Rivaroxaban for Atrial Fibrillation in France
Recruiting	`NCT05442203` - Electrocardiogram-based Artificial Intelligence-assisted Detection of Heart Disease	N/A
Completed	`NCT05599308` - Evaluation of Blood Pressure Monitor With AFib Screening Feature	N/A
Completed	`NCT03790917` - Assessment of Adherence to New Oral anTicoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation patiEnts Within the Outpatient registrY
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05890274` - Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Electrocardiogram (EKG) Interpretation Project ECHO	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05266144` - Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Catheter Ablation
Recruiting	`NCT05316870` - Construction and Effect Evaluation of Anticoagulation Management Model in Atrial Fibrillation	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06023784` - The Impact of LBBAP vs RVP on the Incidence of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrioventricular Block	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05572814` - Transform: Teaching, Technology, and Teams	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04092985` - Smart Watch iECG for the Detection of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Completed	`NCT04087122` - Evaluate the Efficiency Impact of Conducting Active Temperature Management During Cardiac Cryoablation Procedures	N/A
Completed	`NCT06283654` - Relieving the Emergency Department by Using a 1-lead ECG Device for Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Recruiting	`NCT05416086` - iCLAS™ Cryoablation System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT05067114` - Solutions for Atrial Fibrillation Edvocacy (SAFE)
Completed	`NCT04546763` - Study Watch AF Detection At Home
Completed	`NCT03761394` - Pulsewatch: Smartwatch Monitoring for Atrial Fibrillation After Stroke	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.