View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:The POWER FAST I pilot study is a unicentric, observational, non-randomized controlled clinical study. In the control group pulmonary veins isolation was performded in consecutive patients with irrigated radiofrequency cateters without contact force-sensing capabilities and using conventional low-power and long-duration radiofrequency parameters (20-30 W, 30-60 s) under continuous intracardiac-echo image and esophageal temperature monitoring. The study group consist of consecutive patients distributed in three succesive subgroups. In the study group radiofrequency ablation was performed using a point-by-point technique with contact-force catheters with different high-power and short-duration parameters: - Subgroup 50W: power 50 W, application duration ≤ 30 s, target lesion index: LSI ≥ 5 or Ablation Index ≥ 350 (posterior wall) or ≥400 (anterior wall). - Subgroup 60W: power 60 W, application duration 7-10 s, contact force ≥5 g. - Subgroup 70W: power 70 W, application duration 9 s, contact force ≥5 g. The safety endpoint was evaluated with systematic esophageal endoscopy performed <72 h after the index procedure. The efficacy endpoint was evaluated: - during the ablation procedure: acute procedural efficacy, firts-pass isolation of ipsilateral pulmonary veins, total radiofrequency and procedural time, acute reconnections and dormant conduction, - during the follow-up: any atrial tachycardias documented and longer than 30 s were considered recurrences.
Open-label, crossover study recruiting 46 healthy male volunteers comparing the absorption of APO-dabigatran 150 mg per oral (PO) in the absence or presence of a proton pump inhibitor. Participants will serve as their own control when comparing dabigatran exposure in the absence or presence of the proton pump inhibitor, Rabeprazole 20 mg.
Multicenter 1:1 randomized study. Two atrial fibrillation ablation strategies are compared: 1) conventional ablation using point-by-point radiofrequency applications with power 40 W guided by LSI > 6 or AI > 500 on the anterior aspect of pulmonary veins and power 25 W guided by LSI >5 or AI >350 on the posterior wall near the esophagus; 2) point-by-point RF applications with power set at 70 W and duration 9-10 s. The main objective of the trial is the incidence of esophageal lesions evaluated with systematic endoscopy and clinical efficacy evaluated with daily ECG transtelephonic transmissions during 1-year follow-up. Secondary objectives include total RF time and parameters of acute PV isolation efficacy (first-pass isolation, acute reconnections and dormant conduction).
This study is a prospective, randomized controlled study to compare overall clinical outcomes between High Power Short Duration (HPSD) and standard radiofrequency (RF) ablation settings for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation in the treatment of subjects with paroxysmal or persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
To establish the safety and effectiveness of the Boston Scientific Cardiac Cryoablation System for treatment of symptomatic, drug refractory, recurrent, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
This is a prospective, observational study that will examine endothelial dysfunction in atrial fibrillation before and after treatment with anti-arrhythmic agents and the extent to which baseline endothelial dysfunction improves after treatment.
The purpose of this study is to determine if an AF detection intervention in men and women at least 70 years of age with undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) reduces the person-years incidence rate of stroke compared to usual care (no AF detection intervention).
In this prospective, randomized, controlled, unblinded, mono-center study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion during left atrial linear ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to the ALINE protocol.
A cross-sectional study (N=400) will investigate the prevalence of symptom preoccupation and its role in AF-related disability. Subjectively-rated assessments will be gathered from 400 AF patients.
In this prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded,monocentric study, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of higher power CLOSE-guided PVI in patients referred for a first ablation for paroxysmal AF. We aim to include 100 patients into two groups (1:1). The experimental group will receive AF ablation with 45 Watt and stricter stability criteria (3 mm for 3 seconds) compared to the control group which will receive AF ablation according to the standard CLOSE-protocol (35 Watt and stability criteria of 3 mm for 8 seconds).