View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. The incidence of AF varies between 20 - 45 % after (coronary artery bypass grafting) CABG. It may lead to hemodynamic compromise, thromboembolic events, increased length of stay in the hospital and increased morbidity. The underlying cause of AF has been related to a variety of factors. Those most commonly related to the intraoperative management are the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the influence of systemic inflammation, myocardial damage, intraoperative fluid management and the need of red blood cell transfusion. The purpose of the study is to find out the difference in the incidence of atrial fibrillation after CABG when using the conventional (CECC) or mini bypass system (MECC). The treatment protocol is similar in both groups except the CPB method (CECC vs. MECC). In both methods the investigators use MAQUET tubing and oxygenator. The investigators also collect special blood samples for determining most relevant factors found affecting in the incidence of AF.
This study is planned to medicate oral T3(Liothyronine)to the patients who are planned to have OPCAB(off- pump coronary bypass graft surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of oral triiodothyronine (T3) therapy on postoperative thyroid hormone concentrations, hemodynamic variables and outcomes in patients undergoing OPCAB in a randomized, controlled trial.
This is a multi-center, observational, 1-year prospective cohort study (1 year follow-up, at 3, 6 and 12 month) with approximately 675 participants. We will conduct a thorough outcomes assessment utilizing data from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, as well as pre-procedure and follow-up data. Scans will be blinded to location of participating site. MRI scans will be sequenced and analyzed as they arrive from the database. Imaging Protocol: All patients will undergo a Delayed-Enhancement MRI (DE-MRI) within 30 days prior to the atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure. The purpose of the initial MRI is to quantify the degree of atrial structural remodeling or fibrosis pre-ablation. Following ablation, DE-MRI will be obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up to detect and quantify ablation-related scar formation. Clinical Follow-up: The institution where the ablation was performed will continue post-procedural care following standard of care procedures. Atrial arrhythmia recurrences will be catalogued up to one year post-ablation and predictors of recurrences of AF will be determined by statistical analysis. The specific mechanism and electrophysiological characteristics of atrial arrhythmia recurrence will also be analyzed. Our hypotheses are (1) DE-MRI will reproducibly stage the progression left atrium fibrosis in AF; (2) DE-MRI will reproducibly aid in quantifying and identifying the distribution of catheter ablation-related scarring in the left atrium; and (3) the stage of left atrium fibrosis pre-ablation and the amount and location of scarring will predict success of catheter ablation therapy for AF.
This prospective study aims; 1. To assess if pre-ablation levels of inflammatory biomarkers serve as independent predictors of procedure outcome 2. To evaluate the inflammatory activation following catheter ablation by measuring serum-biomarker levels 24-hours after the procedure and examine the predictive role in procedure success 3. To determine if a change in the baseline level of certain inflammatory biomarkers at 3-months post-ablation period has any correlation with the long-term outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation 4. To study the association of certain biomarkers with specific types of AF (paroxysmal or persistent or long standing persistent)
The DExamethasone for Cardiac Surgery - Postoperative New-onset Atrial Fibrillation (DECS-PNAF) project described in this protocol aims to elucidate how corticosteroids protect cardiac surgical patients from Postoperative New-onset Atrial Fibrillation (PNAF). Patients will be randomized to receive either a single high dose of dexamethasone or a placebo. Continuous ECG-monitoring, echocardiography and biochemical and genomic analyses will be used to investigate the mechanisms responsible for the known protective effect of corticosteroids in the development of PNAF.
Primary Objective: - Evaluate the rate of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) recurrences one month after randomization according to different timings of initiation of dronedarone. Secondary Objective: - Evaluate the rate of AF recurrences two months after randomization. - Assess the safety of the change from amiodarone to dronedarone - Assess dronedarone safety - Explore dronedarone and its active metabolite plasma level (in a subset of countries) - Explore potential Pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between dronedarone and amiodarone (in a subset of countries)
It is our hypotheses that 1) readily available Emergency Department data can be utilized in an Atrial Fibrillation clinical prediction rule to identify those patients at low or high risk for adverse outcomes; 2) Assigned risk can be utilized to drive physician decision-making by identifying patients who do not require hospital admission (low risk) and patients needing hospitalization (high risk); and 3) a facile version of the AFPR will be easily incorporated into standard Emergency Department patient management systems and assist physicians with risk stratification of patients presenting with Atrial Fibrillation.
The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of dabigatran etexilate(BIBR 1048) administered orally at doses of 110 and 150 mg, twice daily, for 12 weeks in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, persistent or permanent) in comparison with warfarin.
This study will create a prospective registry of consecutive patients with Atrial Fibrillation (Afib) considered for cardioversion treatment to document up-to-date practice of in-hospital treatment, with a focus on the characterization of type of Afib, as well as on treatments applied (drugs, devices, interventions and their combinations), and associated complications within 60 days after enrollment.
Rationale: The narrow therapeutic range and wide inter-patient variability in dose requirement make anticoagulation response to coumarin derivatives unpredictable. As a result, patients require frequent monitoring to avert adverse effects and maintain therapeutic efficacy. Polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1) jointly account for about 40% of the inter-individual variability in dose requirements. To date, several pharmacogenetic guided dosing algorithms for coumarin derivatives, predominately for warfarin, have been developed. However, the potential benefit of these dosing algorithms in terms of their safety and clinical utility has not been adequately investigated in randomised settings. Objective: To determine whether a dosing algorithm containing genetic information increases the time within therapeutic INR range during anticoagulation therapy with each of warfarin, acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon compared to a dosing regimen that does not contain this information. Secondary outcomes of the study include cost effectiveness, number of thromboembolic and bleeding events, time to reach stable dose and number of supratherapeutic INR peaks.