Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparative Assessment of Catheter and Thoracoscopic Approaches in Patients With Persistent and Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Despite good progress in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), this
arrhythmia remains one of the major causes of stroke, heart failure, sudden death, and
cardiovascular morbidity in the world. Furthermore, the number of patients with AF is
predicted to rise steply in the coming years.
Even if the amount of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) is constantly increasing, there is a group
of patients who has AF, resistant to AAD therapy. In such cases they are being offered
alternative minimally invasive procedures, such as catheter or thoracoscopic ablation. With
the discovery that AF often is initiated and maintained by electrical instability inside and
around the pulmonary veins (PV) catheter and thoracoscopic ablation are now widely accepted
invasive strategies to cure AF.
Even though the results of both of the procedures are very promising in treating patients
with paroxysmal AF, the decision making process, which approach should be used in patients
with persistant or LSPAF, is still very controversial.
According to 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in
collaboration with EACTS, catheter or surgical ablation should be considered in patients with
symptomatic persistent or long-standing persistent (LSP) AF refractory to AAD therapy to
improve symptoms, considering patient choice, benefit and risk, supported by an AF Heart Team
(IIaC).
Since, there is no actual evidence base, which approach is more effective and save in
patients with persistant and LSP AF, the aim of the investigator's study is to evaluate the
results of both of the approaches in such group of patients.
The aim of this study is to compare 2 approaches for AF treatment, endocardial catheter
isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) versus minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical
epicardial ablation.
The patients in both groups will be comparable and have persistant or LSP AF only. Patients
with previous catheter ablations or any interventions or open heart procedures in the
anamnesis will be excluded. The catheter ablation will be Ablation Index-guided, which means
that every ablation point will be taken according to ablation quality marker which corporates
power, delivery time, contact force (CF), and catheter stability, called Ablation Index (AI).
Both of the procedures will be performed by a single identical protocol including wide
complete circumferential ablation around the right and left PVs, and additional lines between
the lower and upper PVs. The thoracoscopic procedure will be supplemented with removal of
left atrial appendage (LAA).
In cases of AF or other atrial tachycardia recurrence after both procedures, every patient
will undergo the opposite procedure (for example, if patient after thoracoscopic ablation
will be diagnosed an AF recurrence, he will undergo catheter ablation). That is why there
will be the third group, the so-called Hybrid procedure group of patients.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04544397 -
Outcomes of Second Generation Laser Balloon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
|
||
Completed |
NCT04473963 -
FLOW-AF: A Study to Evaluate the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW EGF Technology
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04715425 -
Thoracoscopic Surgical Versus Catheter Ablation Approaches for Primary Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04045067 -
Low-voltage Areas Defragmentation in Sinus Rhythm for Radiofrequency Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04148625 -
Subxyphoid Hybrid MAZE Registry for Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05481359 -
AF-FLOW Registry: This Study is to Evaluate Ablamap Software in Patients Undergoing Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.
|
||
Completed |
NCT06260670 -
FLOW EVAL-AF: FLOW Mapping Electrogram VALidation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05883631 -
RESOLVE-AF: Clinical Evaluation of the Ablacathâ„¢ Mapping Catheter and Ablamap® System Utilizing Electrographic Flow (EGF) Mapping to Resolve Extra-PV Sources of Atrial Fibrillation and Guide Ablation Therapy.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04942834 -
Using Cryoballoon Ablation as Initial Treatment for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04606693 -
Value of Screening and Treatment of SAHS in the Management of AF Ablation Candidates
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04508491 -
Cognitive Function in Patients With Persisted Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05507749 -
Cyroablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients With Early Persistent AF Assessed by Continuous Monitoring
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06098989 -
A Prospective Study of REPeat Ablation In Patients With Recurrent PERSistent Atrial Fibrillation: Pulmonary Vein Isolation vs. Adjunct Posterior Wall Isolation (REPAIR PERS-AF Study)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05575557 -
Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Right Heart Evaluation for Patients Requiring Physiological Pacing Treatment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05411614 -
Hybrid AbLaTion of Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04342312 -
Intensive Molecular and Electropathological Characterization of Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04542785 -
Lenient Rate Control Versus Strict Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation. The Danish Atrial Fibrillation Randomised Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04206917 -
MultiPulse Therapy (MPT) for AF
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04229160 -
Noninvasive 3D Mapping in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, to Describe Modifications of the Arrhythmogenic Substrate After Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Identify Potential Predicting Factors of Ablation Success
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05883722 -
Adjunctive Right Atrial Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
|
N/A |