Asthma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Asthma Control in Severe Asthma Patients Treated With Tezepelumab: A Prospective, Observational, Real-World Evidence Study (ASCENT)
A study involving primary data collection within real-world settings of participants who initiate treatment with tezepelumab for severe uncontrolled asthma. This study will complement evidence obtained from randomized controlled trials and provide new data focusing on the holistic and patient reported outcome (PRO).
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 550 |
Est. completion date | November 20, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | November 20, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 12 Years to 130 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female participants aged 12 years or older - Provision of signed and dated written informed consent, including assent for minors - Prescribed treatment with Tezepelumab - Diagnosis of asthma for at least 52 weeks prior to enrolment date and symptoms confirmed by the Investigator not to be due to alternative diagnoses - Received at least one prescription of medium-dose to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) during the 52 weeks prior to enrolment date - Use of additional asthma maintenance controller medication(s) for at least 52 weeks prior to enrolment date - Documented history of at least 1 asthma exacerbations during the 52 weeks prior to enrolment date - Individuals with ACQ-6 score = 1.5 (indicating inadequate asthma symptom control) at enrolment or up to 12 weeks before enrolment - Participants currently receiving care from pulmonologists and/or allergists - Participants who are able to understand and complete the ePROs - Availability of participants medical records for asthma exacerbation and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) for the 52 weeks prior to Tezepelumab initiation Exclusion Criteria: - Any contraindication to Tezepelumab - Participants on concurrent biologics for asthma at the time of receiving the first dose of Tezepelumab will be excluded except for stable allergen immunotherapy (defined as a stable dose and regimen at the time of enrolment) - Participation in an observational study that might, in the Investigator's opinion, influence the assessment for the current study, or participation in an interventional clinical trial in the last 3 months - Pregnancy or lactation period. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Austria | Research Site | Innsbruck | |
Austria | Research Site | Klagenfurt Am Worthersee | |
Austria | Research Site | Wien | |
Austria | Research Site | Wien | |
Belgium | Research Site | Erpent | |
Belgium | Research Site | Gent | |
Belgium | Research Site | Leuven | |
Belgium | Research Site | Liege | |
Belgium | Research Site | Moeskroen | |
Belgium | Research Site | Woluwe Saint Lambert | |
Belgium | Research Site | Yvoir | |
Canada | Research Site | Calgary | Alberta |
Canada | Research Site | Edmonton | Alberta |
Canada | Research Site | Kingston | Ontario |
Canada | Research Site | Mississauga | Ontario |
Canada | Research Site | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | Research Site | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan |
Canada | Research Site | St Johns | Newfoundland and Labrador |
Canada | Research Site | Toronto | Ontario |
Canada | Research Site | Vancouver | British Colombia |
Canada | Research Site | Windsor | Ontario |
Denmark | Research Site | Copenhagen | |
Denmark | Research Site | Hvidovre | |
Denmark | Research Site | Vejle | |
Germany | Research Site | Aschaffenburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Auerbach | |
Germany | Research Site | Augsburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Bamberg | |
Germany | Research Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Research Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Research Site | Biberach an der Riss | |
Germany | Research Site | Bonn | |
Germany | Research Site | Cottbus | |
Germany | Research Site | Delitzsch | |
Germany | Research Site | Dusseldorf | |
Germany | Research Site | Dusseldorf | |
Germany | Research Site | Flensburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Freiburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Hamburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Hamburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Hanover | |
Germany | Research Site | Heidelberg | |
Germany | Research Site | Leipzig | |
Germany | Research Site | Marburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Marburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Markkleeberg | |
Germany | Research Site | Munchen | |
Germany | Research Site | Schleswig | |
Germany | Research Site | Stuttgart | |
Germany | Research Site | Teuchern | |
Germany | Research Site | Volklingen | |
Germany | Research Site | Wiesbaden | |
Israel | Research Site | Jerusalem | |
Israel | Research Site | Rehovot | |
Israel | Research Site | Tel Aviv | |
Italy | Research Site | Ancona | |
Italy | Research Site | Bergamo | |
Italy | Research Site | Catanzaro | |
Italy | Research Site | Firenze | |
Italy | Research Site | Milano | |
Italy | Research Site | Napoli | |
Italy | Research Site | Padova | |
Italy | Research Site | Palermo | |
Italy | Research Site | Roma | |
Italy | Research Site | Siena | |
Italy | Research Site | Yradate | |
Sweden | Research Site | Stockholm | |
Sweden | Research Site | Uppsala | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Basel | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Chur | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Lugano | |
Switzerland | Research Site | Sion |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
AstraZeneca |
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Israel, Italy, Sweden, Switzerland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) score | Participant-reported asthma symptom control using ACQ-6 will be described. The ACQ-6 was developed for self-administration by adults and adolescents by omitting the forced expiration volume in 1 second (FEV1) % predicted question. Patients are asked to record their experience with 5 symptoms (night-time waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, and wheezing) and use of short-acting. ß2 agonist over the previous week using a 7-point scale (0 = no impairment; 6 = maximum impairment). The ACQ-6 score is calculated by taking the mean of the 6 equally weighted items. The ACQ-6 score range is 0 (well controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled). | Week 52 | |
Primary | Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ-6) score from Baseline | Participant-reported asthma symptom control using ACQ-6 will be described. The minimum value of ACQ-6 score is 0 and the maximum value of ACQ-6 score is 6. The ACQ-6 score of 0 indicates well tolerated asthma whereas, the ACQ-6 score of 6 indicates extremely poorly controlled asthma | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Primary | Number of participants with improvement in ACQ-6 response score | Improvement from baseline in ACQ-6 score of >=0.5 will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Primary | Number of participants with well-controlled asthma (ACQ-6 score = 0.75) | Participant-reported asthma symptom control using ACQ-6 will be described. | Week 52 | |
Primary | Time to first ACQ-6 response | Time to first ACQ-6 response will be assessed. The ACQ-6 response is defined as change from baseline in ACQ-6 score <= -0.5. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score | Asthma-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be described. The SGRQ is a 50-item PRO instrument developed to measure the health status of patients with airway obstruction diseases. The total score indicates the impact of disease on overall health status. This total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Asthma Control Test (ACT) total score | Asthma-specific HRQoL will be described. The ACT is a questionnaire that assesses shortness of breath and general asthma symptoms, use of rescue medications, effect of asthma on daily functioning, and overall asthma control. Patients are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the past 4 weeks by responding to 5 questions on a scale of 1 to 5. The responses from the 5 items are summed to produce an ACT score that range from 5 (poorly controlled asthma) to 25 (well-controlled asthma). An ACT score = 20 indicates well-controlled asthma, 16 to 19 indicates not well-controlled asthma, and = 15 indicates very poorly controlled asthma. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in SGRQ total score | Asthma-specific HRQoL will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in ACT total score | Asthma-specific HRQoL will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Number of participants with improvement in SGRQ total score | Improvement of = 4 in SGRQ total score will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Number of participants with improvement in ACT total score | Improvement of = 3 in ACT total score will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) | Lung function will be described. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Post-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) | Lung function will be described. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Pre BD forced vital capacity (FVC) | Lung function will be described. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Post-BD FVC | Lung function will be described. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Pre-BD forced expiratory flow (FEF) | Lung function will be described. | Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0), Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 | |
Secondary | Changes from baseline in pre-BD FEF | Lung function will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Changes from baseline in pre-BD FEV1 | Lung function will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Changes from baseline in post-BD FEV1 | Lung function will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Changes from baseline in pre-BD FVC | Lung function will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Changes from baseline in post-BD FVC | Lung function will be described | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants with spirometry and/or body plethysmography parameters | Participants will be assessed through spirometry and body plethysmography parameters | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Number of participants who achieve 5% or 100 mL improvement in pre-BD and post-BD FEV1 | Lung function will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) | Annual asthma exacerbation rate is calculated in years as total number of exacerbations of interest divided by the total time at risk. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants with asthma exacerbations | Asthma exacerbations will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants with reduced total number of asthma exacerbations | Proportion of participants with reduced total number of asthma exacerbations at the end of 52 weeks compared with baseline | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants who completed 52 weeks of tezepelumab treatment with at least 50% reduction in exacerbations | Asthma exacerbations will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants who completed 52 weeks of tezepelumab treatment without an asthma exacerbation | Asthma exacerbations in 52 weeks will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in AAER | Asthma exacerbations will be described. | Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Cumulative asthma exacerbation days | Asthma exacerbations in participants resulting in any hospitalization will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants with any systemic corticosteroid (SCS) or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use | Asthma related SCS or ICS use will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Number of participants with categorised percent reduction on cumulative systemic corticosteroids (SCS) dose | Percent reduction on cumulative SCS dose is categorized as follows: >=25%, >=50%, >75% and 100%. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Median SCS or ICS dose change | Asthma related SCS or ICS use will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants with long-term SCS and ICS use | Asthma related SCS or ICS use (>30 consecutive days) before and after tezepelumab initiation will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Time to earliest use SCS from tezepelumab initiation among patients that used SCS or ICS | Time to earliest use SCS from tezepelumab initiation among patients that used SCS or ICS will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Number and type of asthma related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) | Asthma related HCRU will be described. | Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0), Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 | |
Secondary | Annualized rates of asthma-related visits leading to hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits, urgent care visits, or unscheduled out-patient or physician visits | Asthma related HCRU will be described. | Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0), Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 | |
Secondary | Annualized rates of asthma related physician/healthcare calls/visits | Asthma related HCRU will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Duration of asthma-related hospitalisation | Asthma related HCRU will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants with stable disease | Asthma disease stability is a composite endpoint consisting of ACQ-6, FEV1, exacerbations, and OCS use. The participants achieve full disease stability when they reach a meaningful improvement in all 4 parameters which is maintained to the end of the follow-up period (Week 52). This includes ACQ-6 < 1.5, Pre-BD FEV1 at Week 52/pre-BD FEV1 at baseline >0.95, 50% reduction in annualized number of exacerbations in the follow-up period, and at least =50% reduction in OCS use in the follow-up period. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Duration (days) of tezepelumab treatment | Tezepelumab treatment features, including duration of therapy will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants with tezepelumab discontinuation and reason(s) | Tezepelumab treatment features, including discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Proportion of participants with switching to other biologics for asthma and reasons(s) | Tezepelumab discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Time to tezepelumab discontinuation | Time taken to discontinue tezepelumab will be described. | From Baseline (Week -52 to Week 0) to Week 52 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04624425 -
Additional Effects of Segmental Breathing In Asthma
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04410523 -
Study of Efficacy and Safety of CSJ117 in Patients With Severe Uncontrolled Asthma
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03927820 -
A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Increase Inhaler Access and Reduce Hospital Readmissions (PILLAR)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04617015 -
Defining and Treating Depression-related Asthma
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03694158 -
Investigating Dupilumab's Effect in Asthma by Genotype
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT04946318 -
Study of Safety of CSJ117 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Uncontrolled Asthma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04450108 -
Vivatmo Pro™ for Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) Monitoring in U.S. Asthmatic Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03086460 -
A Dose Ranging Study With CHF 1531 in Subjects With Asthma (FLASH)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01160224 -
Oral GW766944 (Oral CCR3 Antagonist)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03186209 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of Benralizumab in Patients With Uncontrolled Asthma on Medium to High Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid Plus LABA (MIRACLE)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02502734 -
Effect of Inhaled Fluticasone Furoate on Short-term Growth in Paediatric Subjects With Asthma
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01715844 -
L-Citrulline Supplementation Pilot Study for Overweight Late Onset Asthmatics
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT04993443 -
First-In-Human Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Pharmacokinetics of LQ036
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02787863 -
Clinical and Immunological Efficiency of Bacterial Vaccines at Adult Patients With Bronchopulmonary Pathology
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06033833 -
Long-term Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Subcutaneous Amlitelimab in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-severe Asthma Who Completed Treatment Period of Previous Amlitelimab Asthma Clinical Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03257995 -
Pharmacodynamics, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Two Orally Inhaled Indacaterol Salts in Adult Subjects With Asthma.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02212483 -
Clinical Effectiveness and Economical Impact of Medical Indoor Environment Counselors Visiting Homes of Asthma Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04872309 -
MUlti-nuclear MR Imaging Investigation of Respiratory Disease-associated CHanges in Lung Physiology
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT01468805 -
Childhood Asthma Reduction Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05145894 -
Differentiation of Asthma/COPD Exacerbation and Stable State Using Automated Lung Sound Analysis With LungPass Device
|