View clinical trials related to Arthritis.
Filter by:50-90% of patients with RA reports foot problems and the metatarsophalangeal joints of the forefoot are most frequently afflicted. Studies shows that foot problems can influence negatively on the walking function, physical activity and quality of life. Different foot orthoses and insoles are used as an intervention. Studies find that different insoles do have effect on pain, but there are no or minor effect on walking ability. The literature reports a further need for research and indicates the importance of studies on the effects of cost-effective insoles for patients with RA. Custom-built insoles takes time and are often expensive, and many patients, especially women, do not wear them since they often do not fit the shoes they prefer to wear. In this study, a 4-mm thin, flat insole of a malleable plastic material (CI-Core®) with synthetic textile material on the upper side is customized to provide support for the transverse and longitudinal arches of the foot to reduce pressure on painful joints. The insole is easily customized and ready for use the same day. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this insole can reduce foot pain and increase walking distance in patients with RA and forefoot pain. An experimental study was performed on patients with RA and forefoot pain in either one or both feet. The patients walked as fast as they could in 6 minutes (6MWT) with either insoles (situation A) and without insoles (situation B). The order of situation A and B was randomized, and the assessor was blinded for the order of the two situations. Both tests were conducted the same day. After each test round, the patient was asked to register pain in the foot and perceived exertion. A telephone interview was conducted one year after the effect study to examine whether the insoles were still being used.
This study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparison study in rheumatoid arthritis participants inadequately responding to biologics.
This study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparison study in rheumatoid arthritis participants inadequately responding to methotrexate.
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with positive antibodies against carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) have a more severe clinical course. The primary objective of this study in adult subject with RA is as follows: To explore the clinical differences in activity indexes (Disease Activity Score of 28 joints with Erythro Sedimentaion Rate (DAS28-ESR)) at 6, 12 and 18 months of follow up according the anti-CarP antibodies status.
The study objectives of Period 1 of this study were to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of subjects from China and selected countries including Brazil and South Korea with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are on a stable dose of csDMARDs and have an inadequate response to csDMARDs. The study objective of Period 2 is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib in subjects with RA who have completed Period 1.
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood. The upper extremity involvement in JIA causes muscle imbalance, joint destruction, pain, stiffness and limitations on daily living activities (DLA) in varying degrees. However, the information about prevalence of symptoms, disorders, DLA limitations, participation restriction and options of treatments for upper extremity involvement in JIA are limited. It has been reported that improvements of upper extremity functions were achieved by video-based games (VBG) in various disease groups. However, in the literature, no study has been found about effectiveness of WBG in children with arthritis. The aim of the study was to investigate effects of task-oriented activity training (TOAT) with VBG versus activity training in real life on activity performance and participation in children with arthritis. Participants with upper limb involvement in JIA were randomly assigned to the activity training in real life group (group I) and TOAT with VBG in real life group (group II). The actual materials and rehabilitation kits will be used for activity training in group 1, the DLA that expected to gain independence will be trained with VBG in group 2. Upper extremity muscle strength and grip, range of motion, upper limb functions, activity, participation and quality of life will be evaluated. The hypothesis of this study is that TOAT with VBG improves the activity performance and physical functions and increases the participation, via being stimulative and interactive in order to provide feedback and to increase interest and motivation.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including 160 consecutive patients who have been diagnosed with both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and low bone mass and have been treated with alendronate (ALN) for five years or more. Patients will be randomized to discontinuation or continuation of alendronate. Outcomes are measured using dual energy absorptiometry (DXA), High Resolution peripheral Quantitative Computer Tomography (HR-pQCT) and biochemical markers of bone metabolism and inflammation after 6 months, 1 and 2 years.
The study schedule consists of a Screening Period (up to 14 days), a blinded 4- week Titration-to-Effect Period with weekly visits, a blinded 4-week Maintenance Treatment Period at the optimal dose level determined for each patient, and a 1-week Follow-up Period. Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either CR845 or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Every patient will be started on a 1-mg dose of CR845 or matching placebo. During the post-randomization Titration-to-Effect period, the dose of study drug may be increased to 2.5 mg or 5 mg in a double-blind fashion. Patients may know their dose is being changed but will not know whether they were randomization to active study drug or placebo. Approximately 330 patients will be enrolled in this study.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects 0.5-1% of the population, and where many patients in spite of modern pharmacological treatment fail to reach remission. The main goal of the randomized cross-over trial ADIRA (Anti-inflammatory Diet In Rheumatoid Arthritis) is to test the hypothesis that a diet intervention will decrease disease activity and improve quality of life in patients with established RA.
The main purpose of the study was to compare rheumatoid arthritis symptom improvement in participants who were given ABP 710 to those who were given infliximab, 22 weeks after starting treatment.