View clinical trials related to Arthritis.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate guselkumab efficacy versus placebo in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and an inadequate response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-alpha) therapy by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of joint disease.
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): RA is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease that primarily affects the small joints, eventually leading to bone erosion and an inability to move (1). Several immune cells participate in the pathogenesis of RA. One of those cells is B cell.
This is a Phase III Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P17 with Humira in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
The purpose of the study is a scientific and prospective documentation of the clinical effects of an inpatient treatment at the Immanuel Hospital of Berlin, in the department for complementary and integrative medicine, with the use of a modified fasting regime. A pre- and post- as well as group comparisons are planned. Patients that are admitted to the inpatient department for metabolic syndrome, osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia will be enrolled in the study.
The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy and adverse events in the following 3 groups in rheumatoid arthritis patients: 1. Sarilumab treatment for 12 months 2. Tocilizmab treatment for 12 months 3. Abatacept treatment for 12 months
This study is designed to assess the efficacy of apremilast, either in monotherapy or with stable methotrexate, on imaging outcomes in adults with active psoriatic arthritis with less than 5 years of disease duration (since diagnosis), and who are naïve to biologic therapies.
The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of etanercept plus methotrexate vs methotrexate alone in pediatric patients with active polyarticular course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA).
Rationale: A wide range of serum trough concentrations is observed in tocilizumab-treated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, while 1 mg/L tocilizumab is sufficient to block systemic interleukin-6 receptor. A substantial proportion of patients has higher serum tocilizumab concentrations and is likely to be overexposed. We expect that patients can at least reduce the dose aiming for a concentration of 5 mg/L without reducing efficacy. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of the study after 20 weeks of follow-up, this includes the evaluation of the dose-reduction algorithm in tocilizumab-treated patients with RA. Study design: Double-blind randomized controlled pilot study with a follow up of 20 weeks. Study population: Consecutive RA patients that are treated with tocilizumab intravenously every four weeks for at least 24 weeks. Patients are screened for tocilizumab concentration after signing informed consent. Intervention: Patients with a concentration below 5 mg/L will continue the dose. Those patients with a tocilizumab concentration above 5 mg/L are randomly assigned (2:1) to dose reduction or to continuation of the standard care tocilizumab dose. In the intervention group, the precise dose-reduction is calculated per patient in order to achieve a tocilizumab concentration of 5 mg/L (range 4-6 mg/L). Main study parameters/endpoints: The feasibility of the study logistics is evaluated according to the dropout rate and patients opinion about the study. Second, the proportion of patients achieving the targeted tocilizumab concentration after dose reduction is evaluated. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Dose-reduction will lead to lower drug costs and possibly to reduce the risk of adverse events. Since we lower the tocilizumab concentration in a proportion of the patients, risk of a exacerbation of the disease exists. In this case, patients will receive their original dose. Previous studies showed that disease activity is controlled adequately after returning to the standard dose. However, our algorithm is designed to reach concentrations of 5 mg/L (range 4-6 mg/L) and studies showed that 1 mg/L of tocilizumab is sufficient to maintain clinical effect. The expected burden of this study is low, since study visits are planned at the time of infusion and therefore do not take extra time. The additional burden consists of an extra blood sample taken every visit and the fingerprick that is performed once.
The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of etanercept in children with polyarticular course JRA.
Following the evidence from the controlled clinical trial setting on the significant clinical benefits of apremilast in the treatment of active PsA, there is a scarcity of real-life evidence on the effectiveness and the beneficial role of apremilast in PsA in routine clinical practice. The present study primarily aims to generate real-world evidence on the impact of apremilast treatment on a broad population of biologic-naïve PsA patients in terms of its clinical effectiveness across the wide spectrum of disease manifestations, as well as its impact on disease burden and HRQoL, in the routine primary care settings of Greece.