Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Speaking in unison with another person is included as a part of many treatment approaches for aphasia. It is not well understood why and how this technique works. One goal of this study is to determine who benefits from speaking in unison, and what characteristics of speech are most helpful. Another goal is to investigate a possible mechanism for this benefit: why does speaking in unison help? A possible mechanism for this benefit is examined, by testing whether the degree of alignment of a person's speech with that of another speaker can account for unison benefit.


Clinical Trial Description

Aphasia is an acquired language disorder, most commonly due to stroke. It can affect an individual's ability to speak, understand spoken language, read, and write. Many treatments designed to improve spoken language in persons with aphasia (PWAs) use unison speech, having the person with aphasia speak along with the clinician or with a recording. One goal of this study is to determine who benefits from speaking in unison, and what characteristics of speech help them the most. Another goal is to investigate a possible mechanism for this benefit: why does speaking in unison help? This knowledge is important because understanding who benefits from this commonly used and potentially powerful therapy component, under which conditions they benefit, and why they do, is critical for customizing therapy so it can be as effective and efficient as possible. Unison speech is conducted using one of two different timing patterns: (1) a natural conversational pattern, which is used in everyday conversations, or (2) a metrical pattern, which follows a beat-based timing framework, as in songs or some poems. In either case, precisely aligning one's speech with that of another person (i.e., entraining one's speech) requires prediction: each speaker must plan their own speech motor commands before having heard the other speaker say the words they are planning. Natural conversational timing requires the speaker to make use of knowledge about language, particularly grammar, to align with the other person. In contrast, a metrical pattern allows a speaker to predict speech timing without relying heavily on language-based knowledge. Given that many PWAs have impaired grammar, we hypothesize that most PWAs will benefit more from speaking in unison to sentences with metrical vs. conversational timing patterns. However, there is great variation in linguistic, motor speech, and timing skills across PWAs, so metrical and conversational timing patterns are likely to have different degrees of effectiveness for different individuals. Results from this study will demonstrate how individual characteristics and speech timing affect whether or not a person with aphasia benefits from speaking in unison. Results will also indicate whether a speaker's ability to predict speech timing is necessary for a benefit of unison speech. Prediction ability will be measured by how closely the speaker aligns their speech with a spoken model. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05248295
Study type Interventional
Source MGH Institute of Health Professions
Contact Lauryn Zipse, PhD
Phone 6176433245
Email lzipse@mghihp.edu
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date December 4, 2018
Completion date December 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03622411 - Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Chronic Phase N/A
Recruiting NCT03605381 - MORbidity PRevalence Estimate In StrokE
Recruiting NCT03929432 - Treatment Outcomes With tDCS in Post-Stroke Aphasia N/A
Completed NCT03662295 - Stroke-like Migraine Attacks After Radiation Treatment (SMART) Syndrome Language Intervention
Completed NCT03679637 - Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Acute Phase After Stroke N/A
Completed NCT03228264 - A Trial Investigating Telerehabilitation as an add-on to Face-to-face Speech and Language Therapy in Post-stroke Aphasia. N/A
Completed NCT03550092 - Analysis of Brain Activity to Uncover Brain-behavior Relationships Related to Therapy Outcomes in Aphasia N/A
Suspended NCT04290988 - Circuitry Assessment and Reinforcement Training Effects on Recovery N/A
Recruiting NCT05969548 - pBFS-guided cTBS at Different Doses for Aphasia After Stroke N/A
Recruiting NCT04138940 - Modulating Intensity and Dosage of Aphasia Scripts N/A
Terminated NCT02249819 - Evaluating Anodal tDCS Preceding Aphasia Therapy Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT01654029 - Patient Centred Communication Intervention N/A
Completed NCT00843427 - fMRI of Language Recovery Following Stroke in Adults N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT00227461 - Levetiracetam (Keppra) to Improve Chronic Aphasia in Post-stroke Patients. Phase 1
Completed NCT03773419 - Improving Electronic Written Communication in Aphasia N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04142866 - Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) With Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) in Chronic Aphasia N/A
Suspended NCT04048668 - tDCS to Treat Subacute Aphasia N/A
Recruiting NCT04081207 - Using Augmentative & Alternative Communication to Promote Language Recovery for People With Post-Stroke Aphasia N/A
Completed NCT02226796 - Transcranial Direct Stimulation (tDCS) and Behavioral Intervention in Aphasia N/A
Completed NCT01163461 - Phonomotor Treatment of Word Retrieval Deficits in Individuals With Aphasia N/A