View clinical trials related to Appendicitis.
Filter by:To compare the results associated with two different skin closure techniques in open appendectomy. 200 patients were included after acute appendicitis diagnosis in emergency department. They were grouped randomly into two groups: patients who would receive skin closure with skin closure by an unique absorbable intradermic stitch (Group A) and another that would receive a habitual technique consistent in non absorbable separated stitches (Group B). General characteristics like gender, age, body mass index (IMC), comorbidities and allergies were registered. Days of evolution (DOE) until surgery, use of antibiotics previously, complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis, surgery time and wound complications like skin infection, dehiscence, seroma or abscess were registered in each case too,
The objective of this study is to assess whether the administration of nebulized intra-peritoneal ropivacaine at the onset of surgery, compared with nebulized saline, reduces morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy surgery in children and adolescents.
Acute appendicitis is the most common illness that brings pediatric patients to the hospital for surgical treatment. Abdominal pain is the symptom because of which the patients go to the hospital. Some patients have severe pain and need analgesics before the final diagnosis and before surgery. After surgery most patient experience pain and at least 80 % of the patients need postoperative pain medication. For two decades there has been a clinical guideline for pain management in Kuopio University Hospital (KUH). The investigators aim was to evaluate how well the pain management for pediatric patient works in clinical practice.
The objective of this study is to determine whether administering once-daily doses of metronidazole, an intravenous (IV) antibiotic used to prevent infection in perforated appendicitis, is as effective in children as delivering it in the standard method of once every eight hours. Reducing the frequency of administration has the potential of decreasing personnel time and healthcare cost and increasing the lifespan of the IV line. To determine the effectiveness once-daily administration, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to compare outcomes between the two treatment schedules. We will recruit 100 patients (50 per treatment) aged 5-18 being surgically treated for perforated appendicitis at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, who will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment schedules. To compare the efficacy of the treatments, outcomes such as duration of hospital stay and theoretical cost will be measured and analyzed using statistical tests.
The study will explore CT radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable in diagnosing acute appendicitis, by using of dose simulation technique and iterative reconstruction.
This study focuses on the use of contrast enhanced low-dose CT imaging as a modality to differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis. Differentiation between the two forms of acute appendicitis is important because according to recent studies their treatment differs. Complicated forms are still treated operatively, while uncomplicated forms can be treated conservatively with antibiotics. In the initial phase of the study, several optimized CT protocols will be created with a phantom model. The two best performing models will be selected for the second phase of the study, in which patients presenting with suspected acute appendicitis will be imaged with the two protocols. All patients participating in the study will be treated operatively, primarily with a laparoscopic appendectomy. Thus histological confirmation for the diagnosis can be achieved and compared with the CT images. The goal of this study is to optimize a well-performing low-dose CT imaging protocol to use in the diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
1. Purpose and Objective: The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of rapid acquisition of point of care 3D ultrasound for pediatric appendicitis. The study will use a newly developed acquisition method and post-processing technique to create three dimensional image models of the abdomen. 2. Study activities and population group. The study population will be a convenience sample of patients 18 years and younger with suspected appendicitis, whose clinical care (unrelated to the study) includes ultrasound and/or CT of the abdomen. The study intervention includes acquisition of research ultrasound images, which will not be used for clinical care, and comparison of these images with clinically obtained images. Other clinical data such as surgical and pathology reports will also be reviewed. If not evident from the patient medical record, the final diagnosis will be confirmed by a telephone call to the subject 2 weeks after the initial visit. 3. Data analysis and risk/safety issues. This is a pilot study intended to determine feasibility and to refine image reconstruction algorithms. Research images will be compared to clinical images to determine the frequency of visualization of the appendix and whether the appendix was deemed normal or abnormal. Comparison of research images with final diagnosis will also occur. The research intervention, an ultrasound exam, has no known safety risks. The only risk to subjects is loss of confidentiality. This study is observational, not interventional, because the experimental ultrasound will be performed in all subjects and will not be used in the clinical care of patients (consequently, will not have the opportunity to affect clinical outcomes). Experimental images will be reviewed after completion of clinical care and will not be provided to the clinicians caring for the subjects. We are not measuring the effect of the ultrasound examination on the subjects' outcomes.
Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention. The gold standard test for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis is the CT scan. Despite its effectiveness, the test involves exposure to a high dose of radiation. Using ultrasound to diagnose this condition has been described extensively in the medical literature, and this test has a very high specificity (over 95%), however sensitivity of the test is not as good and varies between 40% and 90%. Major limitations of the Ultrasound test include operator dependency as well as factors such as body habitus of the patient, presence of technical disturbances (artifacts) caused by gas in the large intestine and inadequate cooperation from the patient during the exam. All of these factors may affect the ability to detect sonographic signs of appendicitis. The investigators believe that it is possible to reduce the amount of artifacts caused by the presence of gas in the intestine by filling of the colon with liquid suspension that is routinely given in the investigators' hospital before performing an abdominal CT and performing an additional ultrasound scan to those patients in which the initial ultrasound examination (without any preparation) proved to be equivocal or not diagnostic. The target population for the study is any patient who arrives to the emergency room with complaints of right lower quadrant abdominal pain and it is decided by the referring physician in the ER to start diagnostic workup for suspected appendicitis by performing an ultrasound, if the ultrasound exam proves to be equivocal or not diagnostic and it is decided that the patient needs to continue investigation by performing a CT scan, the patient will receive contrast material orally for approximately 180 minutes and prior to the CT the investigators intend to repeat the ultrasound. The investigators hypothesize that the repeat ultrasound will allow a statistically significant improvement in the detection rate of the appendix.
Patient will have usual appendectomy surgery with an injection of local or saline at incision site either before or after the incision at random. The clinical hypothesis of this trial is that pediatric patients who undergo a local anesthetic pre-incisional and/or post-incisional will reduce the amount of postoperative pain and therefore reduce the amount of analgesics required to keep the patient satisfied. Primary: To determine if local anesthetic reduces postoperative pain. Secondary: To assess the timing of local anesthetic injection affects postoperative pain.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield and accuracy of bedside emergency physician performed ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.