View clinical trials related to Appendicitis.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of outpatient management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. For this purpose, a randomized clinical trial was designed. Selected patients who have undergone surgery for acute appendicitis are randomized into two groups. One group with hospitalization and another group without admission.
This is a retrospective review study to evaluate the histopathological findings post appendectomy
Comparing the incidence of complicated appendicitis between two groups, the pandemic and pre-pandemic groups.
A retrospective observational study investigating whether retrocecal appendicitis associated with worse operative and postoperative outcomes than non-retrocecal appendicitis.
Laparoscopic appendectomy causes postoperative pain. The primary objective of this prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on 24-hour cumulative opioid requirements with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Reverse Conversion (Open to Laparoscopic) in management of Acute Perforated Appendicitis
Intravenous lidocaine - a potent local anesthetic with analgesic and anti- inflammatory properties has been shown to be an effective adjunct that reduces intra and postoperative opioid consumption and facilitates pain management in adults. In children population promising but limited evidence is available. The study has been planned to evaluate the efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine in alleviation of hemodynamic reaction to tracheal intubation, as well as metabolic and hormonal response to laparoscopic procedure in children.
After the recent publication of the CODA Trial comparing antibiotics and surgery for acute appendicitis, the investigators developed a comprehensive decision support tool. This tool will help patients understand the risks and benefits of each treatment and make a treatment decision. This study is an online randomized field test comparing the decision support tool to a control infographic and assessing it's affect on decisional outcomes, such as decisional conflict.
This is a retrospective observational study in the form of a cohort study evaluating the use of pre-operative imaging for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a tertiary centre during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. The study group includes all patients who underwent emergency appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis between March 2020 and February 2021, while the control group includes all patients who underwent emergency appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis between March 2019 and February 2020. The final histology will be used as primary outcome, as the study hypothesis is that increasing the use of pre-operative imaging will reduce the negative appendicectomy rate.
Acute appendicitis (AA) is a disease of younger age, but it occurs in 1 out of 500-2000 pregnancies. The current treatment of choice for AA in pregnancy is surgical. Even with standard clinical examination, serum inflammatory markers, and transabdominal ultrasound, the decision on surgical treatment of acute appendicitis (AA) and the rate of negative appendectomy in pregnancy are still unsatisfactory. There are several scoring systems (Alvarado, Tzanakis) that help making decision on operating more easier, however their specificity is either high with low sensitivity, or the other way around. In addition, all scores are based on adult non-pregnant population. We are making an observational study to develop a scoring system that would include ultrasonic imaging with clinical-biochemical parameters while not compromising sensitivity and specificity.