View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Filter by:The trial objective is to investigate whether Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and TransCatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) strategy for treatment of multivessel disease and aortic stenosis will be non-inferior to Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting (CABG) and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) for a composite primary endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, coronary or valve re-intervention and life-threatening or disabling bleeding at one year.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the real-world performance of the CoreValve Evolut PRO transcatheter aortic valve, including leaflet function, in a prospective observational registry.
This study is part of a research project in which new ultrasound-based techniques will be examined to improve clinical decision making for patients with aortic stenosis. These patients could develop increased amounts of myocardial fibrosis. This fibrosis is associated with the patients' prognosis. Fibrosis can be evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which unfortunately is quite expensive and not easily available. Ultrasound-based parameters will be developed for the assessment of the amounts of myocardial fibrosis, especially in the left ventricle. Then it will be examined whether these parameters can predict the patients magnitude of fibrosis and check for association with the patients prognosis. MRI will serve as a gold standard for quantification of myocardial fibrosis. The new echocardiographic techniques and parameters are expected to provide new insights in the interplay between aortic stenosis and left ventricular function, and to ultimately improve the care for patients with aortic stenosis. The present study's objectives are: - Quantify the level of myocardial fibrosis in mild, moderate, and severe aortic stenosis compared with a healthy population. - Evaluate the patients outcome after one and three year of follow-up
Prospective, single-arm, multi-center, interventional post-market study. After signing informed consent, eligible subjects will be implanted with the CE marked Evolut™ PRO system. The investigation purpose is to evaluate the acute and long term clinical performance and safety of Evolut™ PRO in a routine hospital setting in patients with symptomatic native aortic valve stenosis or a stenosed, insufficient, or combined surgical bioprosthetic valve failure necessitating valve replacement within the approved intended use in local geography.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvulopathy in Western countries. The prevalence of AS is constantly increasing due to the aging of the population. Although significant progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the onset and progression of AS, there is no medical treatment to slow or prevent its progression. The only treatment available is Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) performed by surgery or by catheterization (TAVI). AS is associated with an increase of post-load which leads the left ventricular myocardium to hypertrophy. Associated with hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis will gradually develop. Despite interesting data, many unknowns persist and remain to be identified. The aim of the study is to evaluate prospectively the progression and impact of AS in 500 patients using clinical, biological, echocardiographic and MRI parameters performed annually.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvulopathy in Western countries. The prevalence of AS is constantly increasing due to the aging of the population. Although significant progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the onset and progression of AS, there is no medical treatment to slow or prevent its progression. The only treatment available is Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) performed by surgery or by catheterization (TAVI). AS is associated with an increase of post-load which leads the left ventricular myocardium to hypertrophy. Associated with hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis will gradually develop. Despite interesting data, many unknowns persist and remain to be identified. The aim of the study is to characterize prospectively the left ventricular remodeling and assess its changes after AVR and within 1 year in 500 patients using clinical, biological, echocardiographic and MRI parameters.
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is became the gold-standard therapy for patients with severe and symptomatic aortic stenosis with high operative risk or not suitable for surgery. All studies assessed TAVI showed excellent results at short and mid-term follow-up. The current and future development of the devices predict an extension of indications to "intermediate-risk" and younger patients. Therefore, long-term evaluation of these valves is a priority to determine their durability. However, standardized echographic follow-up of patients implanted with TAVI is lacking. Indeed, there was not consensual definition of TAVI degeneration until now. Recently, European Society of Cardiology published echographic criteria to precise and standardized TAVI deterioration based on simple hemodynamic and morphological criteria. In addition, very few studies have been interested in monitoring more than 5 years of these devices. Finally, nowadays we did not know if TAVI evolution is the same as surgical bioprosthesis.
The FinnValve investigators planned a nationwide registry to investigate the early and late outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with aortic valve stenosis performed from 2008 to 2017 at five Finnish University Hospitals. Data will be collected in a dedicated electronic case report form.
Calcified aortic stenosis is the most frequent valvulopathy in Europe and North America. Aortic stenosis is an obstacle to the ejection of blood from the left ventricle to the aorta and leads to morphological changes in the left ventricle and hemodynamic modifications. Intrinsic ventricular performance can be characterized using three parameters: - Ventricular elastance (Ees for End Systolic Elastance) which represents the index of ventricular contractility independently of the load. - Arterial elastance (Ea for Arterial Elastance) which represents the post-load - The ventriculo-arterial coupling index (Ees / Ea) which represents energy efficiency. For patients with high surgical risk (EuroSCORE II> 6), TAVI (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) is recommended for aortic valve replacement. Many complications may occur after TAVI (haemorrhagic, embolic, renal, myocardial ischemia). Post-TAVI complications may also be cardiac decompensation of the underlying cardiac disease to cardiogenic shock. However, literature on left ventricular performance after aortic valvular replacement is poor because of the difficulty and invasiveness of the analysis involved. Cardiac energy analysis plays an additional role in understanding the clinical patients conditions. On this point, cardiac energy modifications, based on ventriculo-arterial coupling, could be indicators of cardiac function. Two methods (ultrasound and pulse contour) are used to understand and explore the ventriculo-arterial coupling, preload, postload, contractility and hemodynamic changes interactions. Echocardiography allows the Ees / Ea and SW / PVA (Stoke work/ pressure-volume area) ratios mesurements. PRAM (Pressure Recording Analytical Method) through the MostCare® monitor, gives common hemodynamic parameters and more specific parameters such as arterial elastance (Ea) cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE), dP / dt. Cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE) is an exclusive variable that describes the hemodynamic performance in terms of energy expenditure in the patient being followed. TAVI procedure is an acute model of ventriculo-arterial coupling modification by treatment of the ventricular ejection obstacle. The PRAM method evaluates the ventriculo-arterial coupling. The aim of our study is to evaluate by PRAM the changes in cardiac energy variables before and after aortic valve replacement by TAVI
To date, no formal, randomized, prospective, head-to-head comparisons of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been undertaken in the severe aortic stenosis (AS) population with small aortic annuli. Objectives of the present study are to compare the hemodynamic performance (incidence of severe PPM and ≥ moderate AR) and clinical outcomes (death, stroke, major or life threatening bleeding) between TAVR and SAVR in patients with severe AS and small aortic annuli.