Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02436655
Other study ID # FWA00011929
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 2015
Est. completion date May 2021

Study information

Verified date December 2021
Source Clinical Centre of Serbia
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Whether to intervene in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular ejection fraction remains controversial. The investigators therefore try to compare clinical outcomes of elective aortic valve replacement to conventional treatment and watchful waiting strategy in a prospective randomized trial.


Description:

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) therapy is obvious choice in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients, because it improves symptoms, LV function and survival. Therefore, the accurate diagnosis of the disease, determination of its severity and precise evaluation of patients' clinical status is essential. However, the treatment decisions and indication for AVR in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) are vague and the subject of ongoing debate. The most recent European and American guidelines have class I indication for AVR in asymptomatic severe AS patients with normal LV EF only in patients already scheduled for other cardiac surgery (for example by-pass surgery). In the case of symptom positive stress test American and European guideline differs, with European guidelines having class I indication and American guidelines only IIb indication. In all those cases of asymptomatic severe AS patients with normal LV EF the level of evidence is C, in other words there are no randomized trials. The consequence is that the decisions are made individually, patient by patient, and for this reason a patient with identical echocardiographic/clinical characteristics might be operated in USA but not in Europe (or any other part in the world), and vice-versa. With the experience that has accumulated so far, there are retrospective and observational data that elective AVR might lead to favorable outcome compared to late (after symptom onset) surgery. This may especially come to attention with the understanding that annual risk of sudden cardiac death in asymptomatic severe AS patients with normal LV EF might be very similar or even a bit higher than operative mortality in experienced cardiac surgery centers. Nevertheless, the majority of cardiologist worldwide are reluctant to send their asymptomatic patient with isolated severe AS and normal LV EF to AVR, and it will probably stay like that till randomized trials give us an answer whether elective AVR is beneficial.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 157
Est. completion date May 2021
Est. primary completion date May 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - men and women of any ethnic origin aged =18 years - Written informed consent - V max across the aortic valve > 4m/s or Pmean = 40mmHg and AVA = 1cm2 or AVAi = 0.6cm2/m2 at rest - Without reported symptoms - Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score < 8% Exclusion Criteria: - Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior randomization - Pregnant or nursing women - Mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study or to follow the protocol - Positive stress-test defined as: 1. Anginal chest pain during testing 2. Syncope, dizziness during testing 3. Decrease in systolic blood pressure during exercise = 20mmHg 4. Malignant arrhythmia during exercise testing (VT or VF) - Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% at rest - Very severe AS (defined as Vmax > 5.5 m/s at rest) - Significant disease of other valves (Mitral stenosis with Pmean > 5mg, or any significant regurgitation = 3+ - Recent AMI (< 1 year) - Need for additional by-pass surgery or for aortic root replacement (i.e Bentall) or ascending aorta in asymptomatic patients undergoing AVR - Previous by-pass surgery - Previous any heart valve surgery - Impaired renal function, i.e. creatinine >200 µmol/L or glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 - Significant pulmonary hypertension at rest (PASP > 50mmHg) - Uncontrolled hypertension at rest (systolic >180 mmHg and diastolic >100 mmHg) - Significant co-morbidity with reduced life expectance (< 3 years) - Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus (HbA1C > 9 %) - Significant COPD (FEV1 < 70% of predicted value) - Permanent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
surgical aortic valve replacement
open heart aortic valve replacement

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium Cardiovascular Center Aalst Aalst
Croatia University Clinical Center "Rebro" Zagreb
Croatia University Clinical Center ''Sestre milosrdnice'' Zagreb
Czechia University Hospital Brno Brno
Czechia Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM) Prague
France Hôpital Cardiologique de Haut Lévèque Pessac
Ireland University Hospital Galway Galway
Italy Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Turin Piedmont
Lithuania Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu klinikos Vilnius
Poland Medical University of Silesia Katowice
Serbia Cardiovascular Center 'Dedinje" Belgrade
Serbia CCSerbia Belgrade
Serbia University Clinical Centre Zvezdara Belgrade
Serbia Insitute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Sremska Kamenica" Novi Sad

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Clinical Centre of Serbia

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium,  Croatia,  Czechia,  France,  Ireland,  Italy,  Lithuania,  Poland,  Serbia, 

References & Publications (3)

Banovic M, Iung B, Bartunek J, Asanin M, Beleslin B, Biocina B, Casselman F, da Costa M, Deja M, Gasparovic H, Kala P, Labrousse L, Loncar Z, Marinkovic J, Nedeljkovic I, Nedeljkovic M, Nemec P, Nikolic SD, Pencina M, Penicka M, Ristic A, Sharif F, Van Camp G, Vanderheyden M, Wojakowski W, Putnik S. Rationale and design of the Aortic Valve replAcemenT versus conservative treatment in Asymptomatic seveRe aortic stenosis (AVATAR trial): A randomized multicenter controlled event-driven trial. Am Heart J. 2016 Apr;174:147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 9. — View Citation

Banovic M, Iung B, Bartunek J, Penicka M, Vanderheyden M, Casselman F, van Camp G, Nikolic S, Putnik S. The Aortic Valve replAcemenT versus conservative treatment in Asymptomatic seveRe aortic stenosis (AVATAR trial): A protocol update. Am Heart J. 2018 Jan;195:153-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 14. — View Citation

Banovic M, Putnik S, Penicka M, Doros G, Deja MA, Kockova R, Kotrc M, Glaveckaite S, Gasparovic H, Pavlovic N, Velicki L, Salizzoni S, Wojakowski W, Van Camp G, Nikolic SD, Iung B, Bartunek J; AVATAR-trial investigators. Aortic Valve ReplAcemenT versus Co — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary all cause death, Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) including: ( Acute Myocardial Infarction - AMI, Stroke - CVI, unplanned hospitalization for Heart failure (HF) needing intravenous treatment 36 months
Primary all cause death, Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) including: ( Acute Myocardial Infarction - AMI, Stroke - CVI, unplanned hospitalization for Heart failure (HF) needing intravenous treatment 5 years
Secondary in-hospital and 30 days operative mortality in operated patients in both groups 30 days
Secondary repeat aortic valve surgery in operated patients in both groups 5 years
Secondary major bleeding according to consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 5 years
Secondary thromboembolic complications based on clinical symptoms, signs and imaging studies 5 years
Secondary repeated major adverse cardiovascular events 5 years
Secondary all-cause death + heart failure hospitalization 5 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04310046 - Optimal Timing of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - The TAVI PCI Trial N/A
Completed NCT03332745 - Mechanism of Decompensation Evaluation - Aortic Stenosis
Recruiting NCT06008080 - Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study With Navitor Valve
Recruiting NCT06055751 - Long Term Evaluation of Cardiac Arrhythmias After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation -The LOCATE Registry
Active, not recruiting NCT04815785 - Safety and Efficacy of TaurusOne® Transcatheter Aortic Valve System in Patients With Severe Calcific Aortic Stenosis N/A
Terminated NCT02202434 - Safety and Efficacy Study of Lotus Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement N/A
Recruiting NCT03029026 - The Role of Occult Cardiac Amyloid in the Elderly With Aortic Stenosis.
Active, not recruiting NCT02903420 - A Clinical Trial of Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Dialysis Patients (Japan) N/A
Completed NCT02629328 - CardioCel Tri-leaflet Repair Study N/A
Completed NCT02306226 - Symetis ACURATE Neo™ Valve Implantation SAVI TF Registry
Completed NCT01676727 - ADVANCE Direct Aortic Study
Withdrawn NCT01648309 - Neuropsychological Testing in Patients Undergoing Transvascular Aortic Valve Implantation N/A
Completed NCT01422044 - Risk Prediction in Aortic Stenosis N/A
Withdrawn NCT00774657 - Ventricular Remodeling In Patients With Aortic Stenosis Assessed Echocardiography N/A
Terminated NCT00535899 - Speckle Tracking Imaging in Patients With Low Ejection Fraction Aortic Stenosis (SPArKLE-AS) N/A
Terminated NCT05070130 - OpSens PRIME CLASS
Completed NCT03314857 - China XT: Safety and Effectiveness of Edwards Lifesciences SAPIEN XT THV in the Chinese Population N/A
Completed NCT04157920 - Impact of Predilatation Between Self-expanding Valves N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06212050 - Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness of the ACURATE neo2 Transcatheter Heart Valve for Severe Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis
Recruiting NCT05893082 - Multicenter Feasibility Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR N/A