View clinical trials related to Antisepsis.
Filter by:The benefits of pre-incision skin antisepsis is well established. However, the role of skin antisepsis after skin closure in abdominal surgery for sepsis is not well reported. This study examined whether the use of skin antisepsis after closing the skin during a surgery for an infection within the abdomen would have an effect on wound infection in the post-operative period. The patients - aged 18 years and above - were categorised into two groups: the first had antisepsis with povidone iodine-soaked gauze while the second group of patients had their wound only dressed with a dry sterile gauze. Both groups were then compared for the occurrence of surgical site infection and other post-operative outcomes. The null hypothesis was that intra-operative skin antisepsis after skin closure following abdominal surgeries would have no effect on the incidence of post-operative Surgical Site Infection while the alternative hypothesis was that intra-operative skin antisepsis after skin closure following abdominal surgeries would have an effect on the incidence of post-operative Surgical Site Infection.
The present study evaluates the effects of bactericidal load reduction after surgical hand antisepsis using the reference antiseptic product propanol- 1 60% as control versus a surgical hand antisepsis with addition of a solution of alcohol, chlorhexidine digluconate and potassium sorbate in order to test if pass the standard european norm 12791.
The present study evaluates the effects of bactericidal load reduction after surgical hand scrub antisepsis using the reference antiseptic product propanol- 1 60% as control versus a surgical hand scrub antisepsis with triclosan 0.5% in order to test if pass the standard european norm 12791.
The present study evaluates the effects of bactericidal load reduction after surgical hand scrub antisepsis using the reference antiseptic product propan-ol-1 60% as control versus a surgical hand scrub antisepsis with addition of a solution of chlorhexidine digluconate and potassium sorbate in order to test if pass the standard european norm 12791.
Context: The neuraxial blocks, spinal anesthesia and epidural anesthesia are among the most frequently performed procedures worldwide, and despite the advancements of medical equipment, remain dependent on experience and practice of the anesthesiologists. Although antisepsis takes part of the daily routine, there are still no solid scientific evidence of the most appropriate antiseptic for these procedures. Objective: To compare the 70% alcohol and 0.5% chlorhexidine alcohol solution in skin antisepsis for the neuraxial blocks. Methods: This is a clinical trial, a prospective, randomized study. There will be selected, consecutively, 70 patients candidates for neuraxial blocks. Patients will be randomly assigned to group A (n = 35), in which the antisepsis will be performed with alcohol 70%, and to group B (n = 35), in which the antiseptic will be performed with the 0.5% chlorhexidine in alcoholic solution. Samples will be collected with swabs in an area of 25 cm² for bacterial cultures three times: in pre-antisepsis moments, in the second minute after antisepsis, and immediately after the puncture. The number of colonies forming units per square centimeter (CFU / cm²) will be counted. The data will be analyzed statistically.