Clinical Trials Logo

Ankle Sprain 3Rd Degree clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Ankle Sprain 3Rd Degree.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04599829 Terminated - Clinical trials for Ankle Sprain 2Nd Degree

Assessment of the Safety and Performance of Ankle Ligament Supports in the Context of a Return to Sport After Sprain

Start date: June 3, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Decathlon has developed Ankle STRONG products which are medical devices that must be positioned around the ankle to limit ankle sprain occurrence. The Ankle STRONG devices cover a range of 3 products (Ankle STRONG 100/500/900). The differences between the devices is based on the strength of compression and the ankle maintain. The objective of this multicentre study is to collect data on the related clinical complications and clinical outcomes of market-approved Decathlon Ankle STRONG products to demonstrate safety and performance of these devices in a real-world setting.

NCT ID: NCT03808454 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Ankle Sprain 2Nd Degree

The Effect of Proprioception of Platelet Rich Plasma for Patients With Ankle Sprain

Start date: October 1, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Ankle sprain is a fairly common sports medicine clinic. In Taiwan at least 150,000 to 200,000 people will suffer from ankle sprains every years. Clinicians have been looking for ways to shorten treatment time and reduce discomfort. Platelet Rich Plasma(PRP) is an endogenous therapeutic technology that involved in regenerative medicine due to its potential to stimulate and accelerate tissue healing. PRP can release lots of growth factors like platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF),transforming Growth Factor Beta(TGF-β), vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF),Epidermal growth factor(EGF) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF). Its use had been based on the theory that increased autologous platelets, that then yield high concentrations of growth factors and other proteins, will lead to increased healing of tendon and soft tissue on a cellular level. In addition, there is no objective evaluation after treatment, so that patients can not provide effective and accurate quantitative feedback. In this study, the investigators divided patients into three groups, respectively, general rehabilitation therapy, autologous PRP injection therapy, autologous PRP injection combined with general rehabilitation therapy.