View clinical trials related to Ankle Fractures.
Filter by:This clinical trial aims to compare a Mixed Reality Viewer in the preoperative informed consent process to standard fracture visualization. The participants population are patients with an indication for surgery of a distal radius fracture, upper ankle fracture or proximal humerus fracture using plate osteosynthesis. The main questions aim to answer are: - Does the use of the Mixed Reality Viewer improve patient understanding? - Does the use of the Mixed Reality Viewer improve patient satisfaction? - Does the use of the Mixed Reality Viewer reduce patient preoperative anxiety? Participants will have their fracture presented via the Mixed Reality Viewer. Researchers will compare standard fracture imaging using X-ray or CT scans to see if there is any difference in understanding, satisfaction and anxiety.
The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative results after ORIF (Open Reduction Inner Fixation) with a partial weight-bearing protocol versus an early full weight-bearing protocol. But in addition, we will measure every patient's actual load by the means of walker integrated bio-feedback insoles for the first six postoperative weeks to record the adherence to the protocol.
The purpose is to find out if incorporation of an intraoperative electro auricular acupuncture protocol when added to a standard multimodal analgesic regimen for patients undergoing surgery to repair lower leg fracture under spinal anesthesia will help reduce postoperative opioid use.
Ankle injuries are among the most common traumatological injuries of the lower limb accounting for approximately 50% of all sports injuries and 25% of musculoskeletal injuries in general. Correct initial diagnosis and proper management is important to reduce the risk of recurrent ankle instability and other complications, such as reduced range of motion, increased ligament laxity, instability, tendon enthesopathy, possible swelling, formation of calcifications, reduced load on the affected limbs while standing and walking, increased pain intensity and pain duration. To date, few studies showed that the effectiveness of physical therapy increases when it is modified based on diagnostic ultrasonography findings. Sonography is not burdensome for the patient, has high reproducibility, and enables dynamic examination and comparison of the interrelationships of individual structures. The aim of this study is to investigate if targeted physiotherapy for post-traumatic ankle conditions designed based of diagnostic ultrasonography findings is more effective than standard physiotherapy. The study hypothesis is that in the experimental group there will be a smaller number of complications of post-traumatic ankle conditions than in the control group. If confirmed the study could have clinical implications.
Ankle fractures account for 10 % of fractures in the adult population. A part of patients (40%) is treated surgically. After healing of the fractures, about one year after the operation, a surgery is often performed to remove the hardware in order to diminish pain. If this surgery is necessary is debated in the literature. The aim of our study is to evaluate the outcome of hardware removal surgery after a surgery of the ankle for a fracture. For that, we will perform do a controlled randomized trial with two arms: one arm includes the participants who will have a hardware removal and the other arm will not have a surgery. Outcome parameters are the patients reported outcome and pain related disability. They will be assessed by the questionnaires FAAM score (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure) and PDI (Pain Disability Index) at the beginning and at the end of the study, at six months. The third outcome parameter will be the complication rate after an anklehardware removal surgery, which will be assessed through the Ernst-Ssink classification.
Ankle injuries are common in musculoskeletal practice with high incidence rate in physically active individuals. Ankle injuries are complex to managed and further complicated with the high recurrence rate, chronic ankle instability, and osteoarthritis (Herzog et al., 2019). The prime ankle stabilizer against valgus forces is the deltoid ligament, which is a triangle band of strong connective tissues to prevent inward ankle rotation. The deltoid ligament is vital for maintaining ankle stability against valgus forces by its deep and superficial components as it restrains eversion and external rotation of the talus on the tibia (Lee et al., 2019). The superficial components of the deltoid ligament are the tibiospring, tibionavicular, tibiocalcaneal and superficial posterior tibiotalar ligaments, while the deep components are the anterior and posterior tibiotalar ligaments. The deep components of the deltoid ligament are the main stabilizers for the ankle joint, while the superficial components have minimal stabilization role (Michelsen et al., 1996; Pankovich, 2002; Jeong et al., 2014). Retraction of the deltoid ligament could cause medial ankle instability, pain, reduce function and early osteoarthritis (Lee et al., 2019). The deltoid ligament is essential for normal functioning of the foot and ankle and to maintain the normal kinematics of the talocrural kinematics. Dodd, Halai and Buckely (2022) discussed based on Ramsey and Hamilton's (1976) and Lubbeke et al..'s (2012) studies that a one mm lateral shift of the talus reduces the contact area of the tibiotalar up to 42%, and medial-sided injuries including an injury to the deltoid ligament would lead to long-term arthritis (Ramsey and Hamilton, 1976; Lubbeke et al., 2012; Dodd, Halai amd Buckley, 2022). More importantly, the deltoid ligament frequently raptures in association with ankle fractures (Wang et al., 2020). However, a recent systematic review stated that there is no consensus regarding deltoid ligament repair and its associated effectiveness and complications (Dodd, Halai and Buckely, 2022). Moreover, no study has explored the long-term effect of deltoid ligament repair in reducing post-traumatic ankle instability and osteoarthritis in patients with weber B fibula fractures. Therefore, the aim of the study is to determine the effect of deltoid ligament repair in patient with Weber B fibular fracture using randomized controlled trial design and two years follow-up period.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes after non-operative treatment of weightbearing stable bi-and trimalleolar ankle fractures.
This project consists of a randomized controlled study design. Study candidates will include all patients 18 years or older, who were evaluated at UCSD and found to have an acute ankle syndesmosis injury requiring surgery. Patients who consent to study participation will be randomized to receive one of two standard of care procedures - either a suture button or Fibulink implant. Outcome measures, including the Olerud-Molander and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores, pain, range of motion, time to return to work, and radiographic evaluation will be collected for each participant. Given the potential degenerative changes and poor radiographic and clinical outcomes with inadequate repair of the syndesmosis, it is imperative to evaluate existing and emerging methods of fixation for patients with acute ankle fractures with syndesmosis injuries.
The investigators aim to evaluate the fixation of the ankle syndesmosis in appropriate ankle fractures with bioabsorbable screws. Ankle fractures are common, and a proportion of them involve both fracture of the bone and also disruption of the syndesmosis, a strong ligamentous complex connecting the distal fibula and tibia. If left without fixation this causes a high incidence of pain and early arthritis. The most common technique for fixation of this syndesmosis involves the use of the same type of metal screws used to fix the fractured bones. As the syndesmosis permits small degrees of movement in normal subjects, fixation of this with metal usually leads to screw breakage and, or pain. It is common practice to remove these screws after a period of time once the syndesmosis has healed in the correct position. Bioabsorbable screws have the advantage of allowing small increments of movement, and also resorb naturally therefore do not have to be removed with a second surgical procedure. They are used in other centres worldwide, and the investigators therefore seek to evaluate syndesmosis fixation with them in their unit. The investigators would aim to recruit patients who have a syndesmotic injury requiring fixation, and who can consent to participating. They would undergo an identical surgical procedure to the standard current practice, apart from using a bioabsorbable screw in exchange for the metallic screw for syndesmosis fixation. All other components would remain unchanged, as would post operative protocol and management. To evaluate the fixation the investigators would use a limited CT scan (equivalent of about 3 months background radiation) after the time of fixation and at one year. This will help to assess the maintenance of reduction of the syndesmosis with time. The investigators would also assess patient reported outcome measures and pain scores, length of procedure and intraoperative radiation levels, weight bearing distribution tests, as well as any complication that may arise.
No study has prospectively compared a traditional post-operative non-weightbearing protocol versus early post-operative weightbearing as tolerated for unstable ankle injuries after surgical fixation of the syndesmosis. This prospective study will attempt to determine if early weightbearing can improve functional outcomes, result in a quicker return to work, and monitor differences in rates of adverse events. It will exclude the most severe ankle injuries and patients with excluding comorbidities.