Single Versus Multiple Injection Ultrasound Guided Paravertebral Blocks

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Paravertebral block (PVB) has been shown to provide excellent analgesia for major breast surgeries resulting in reduced narcotic consumption, reduced nausea, improved quality of recovery, reduced chronic pain and possibly reduced metastasis with breast cancer. Traditionally, PVB is done by multiple injections below T1-T5 transverse processes. With multiple injections, the risk is increased for a pleural, an intraneural, and/or an intravascular injection. Recently, ultrasonography is being used to facilitate PVB. The use of ultrasound imaging enables real-time needle visualization during the procedure. This may improve efficacy and reduce the chances of complication like pneumothorax. Currently, there are no data comparing ultrasound-guided single injection technique with multiple injections technique with regards to extent of spread for PVB. Our objective is to investigate the extent of dermatomal spread of PVB when equal volumes of local anesthetic are injected at one versus five paravertebral sites for patients undergoing major breast surgery. In addition, the investigators wish to compare the performance time and duration of analgesia.

Methodology: After local REB approval, 72 patients undergoing a unilateral mastectomy with or without axillary node dissection will be randomized to receive either single or multiple injections PVB. The PVB will be performed in prone position under real-time ultrasound guidance using a para-sagittal approach.The patients in single injection group will receive single injection PVB at T3-T4 level with 25 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and four subcutaneous sham injections. Patients in the multiple injection group will receive five injections of PVB from T1 to T5 level. 5 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at each level. Pleural drift will be used as a sign of correct needle tip location and local anaesthetic spread. The pinprick method will be used to assess the extent of dermatomal blockade, 20 minutes following the completion of procedure. All patients will receive a standardized general anesthesia for the surgery. Any adverse events including pneumothorax, epidural spread, LA toxicity/seizure, total spinal, will be recorded.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02852421
Study type	Interventional
Source	Lawson Health Research Institute
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	August 2013
Completion date	May 2015

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04580030` - Tricuapid Annular Plane Sistolic Excursion Before General Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension After Induction
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04279054` - Decreased Neuraxial Morphine After Cesarean Delivery	Early Phase 1
Completed	`NCT03640442` - Modified Ramped Position for Intubation of Obese Females.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04099693` - A Prospective Randomized Study of General Anesthesia Versus Anesthetist Administered Sedation for ERCP
Terminated	`NCT02481999` - Pre- and Postoperative EEG-Monitoring for Children Aged From 0,5 to 8 Years
Completed	`NCT04235894` - An Observer Rating Scale of Facial Expression Can Predict Dreaming in Propofol Anesthesia
Recruiting	`NCT05525104` - The Effect of DSA on Recovery of Anaesthesia in Children (Het Effect Van DSA op Het Herstel na Anesthesie Bij Kinderen).	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05024084` - Desflurane and Sevoflurane Minimal Flow Anesthesia on Recovery and Anesthetic Depth	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04204785` - Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions	N/A
Completed	`NCT03277872` - NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03940651` - Cardiac and Renal Biomarkers in Arthroplasty Surgery	Phase 4
Terminated	`NCT02529696` - Measuring Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit Using Wireless Accelerometers
Completed	`NCT05346588` - THRIVE Feasibility Trial	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT03704285` - Development of pk/pd Model of Propofol in Patients With Severe Burns
Recruiting	`NCT05259787` - EP Intravenous Anesthesia in Hysteroscopy	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT02894996` - Does the Response to a Mini-fluid Challenge of 3ml/kg in 2 Minutes Predict Fluid Responsiveness for Pediatric Patient?	N/A
Completed	`NCT05386082` - Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi Study
Terminated	`NCT03567928` - Laryngeal Mask in Upper Gastrointestinal Procedures	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06074471` - Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block	N/A
Completed	`NCT04163848` - CARbon Impact of aNesthesic Gas

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.