Clinical Trials Logo

Anesthesia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Anesthesia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04586569 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

PIRA vs Standard Preoperative Education

Start date: July 6, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of enhanced preoperative education using a Pediatric Interactive Relational Agent (PIRA), designed for children ages 4 through10 years and their families, compared to the standard preoperative education currently provided. The study will also look at any differences in anxiety between the two educational groups.

NCT ID: NCT04585633 Recruiting - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Postoperative Risk Prediction Score After Elective Intracranial Neurosurgery Operation

Start date: July 1, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim of our study is to prevent unnecessary intensive care unit hospitalizations by developing a scoring system to detect low-risk patients after elective intracranial neurosurgery operation.

NCT ID: NCT04583865 Active, not recruiting - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Feasibility and Quality of TeleConsultation in Pediatric Anesthesia

TéléCCCAP
Start date: October 7, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Teleconsultation (TLC) being a new method of anesthesia consultation, deployed as an emergency in healthcare facilities in the Covid context, it has never been evaluated either in terms of feasibility or in terms of quality. An initial assessment will highlight the pitfalls and difficulties encountered and suggest areas for improvement.

NCT ID: NCT04581720 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Minimum Current for Train-of-four Monitoring

Start date: October 12, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Neuromuscular monitoring during general anesthesia is important to make sure adequate muscle relaxation during operation and adequate recovery of muscle power and spontaneous breathing during emergence from general anesthesia. The neuromuscular monitoring is usually using electrical stimulants and the method called train-of-four (TOF) is representative. Because it uses electrical stimulants, the patients could be uncomfortable and feel pain during the monitoring when the patients are conscious. Lowering the current of the stimulants would be helpful in reducing the pain, but there is a concern that the TOF results performed in lower current would be underestimated or inaccurate. Therefore, the investigators want to find the minimal current for TOF monitoring that shows adequate TOF results.

NCT ID: NCT04581616 Completed - Postoperative Pain Clinical Trials

The Effect of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block and Intraoperative Intercostal Nerve Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Thoracic Surgery

Start date: October 16, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to compare the effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and interthoracic intercostal nerve block in thoracic surgery. Interthoracic intercostal nerve block is a routine procedure during the surgery by the surgeon in our hospital, and ultrasound-guide erector spinae plane block is a relative new developed regional analgesia technique introduced since 2016 and mainly done by anesthesiologists. Both technique provide analgesic effect to some extent and reduce opiate consumption and side effects. However, no previous literature or research compare the effect of these two technique in thoracic surgery. The primary endpoint of our study is compare morphine consumption and pain score between patients undergo ESP block and patients undergo ICNB after thoracic surgery; the second endpoint is to compare the recovery condition evaluated by QoR-15 questionaire 24 hours after surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04580030 Active, not recruiting - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Tricuapid Annular Plane Sistolic Excursion Before General Anesthesia Can Predict Hypotension After Induction

(Tapse)
Start date: September 9, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

the investigators purpose is to predict hypotensive condition that can develop after general anesthesia induction by measuring the Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Movement (TAPSE), which is an echocardiographic parameter.

NCT ID: NCT04574947 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Lidocaine And Neuromonitoring in Thyroid Surgery

Start date: January 25, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that the quality of recovery with topical lidocaine is better than placebo.

NCT ID: NCT04570150 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Optimizing Post-operative Recovery in Bariatric Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Outpatient Surgery: A Comparison of Sugammadex and Neostigmine

Start date: January 4, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study assesses the efficacy of sugammadex against neostigmine for hastening recovery from neuromuscular blockade and optimizing pulmonary function in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea presenting for outpatient surgery. Both drugs are used in anesthesiology to reverse neuromuscular blockade that is given in the setting of inducing and maintaining general anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT04567160 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

NOL Index to Compare the Intraoperative Analgesic Effect of Propofol Versus Sevoflurane

PROSEVNOL
Start date: October 1, 2020
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the analgesic properties of propofol and sevoflurane using variation of the NOL index and standard monitoring (Heart Rate and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure) when patients under general anaesthesia with either agents are subjected to a standardized painful stimulus (a tetanic stimulation over the ulnar nerve at 70 mA, 100 Hz for 30 seconds).

NCT ID: NCT04566536 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

NoL Monitor Performances of Nociceptive and Non-nociceptive Stimuli Discrimination During Robotic Surgery

ROBOTNOL
Start date: October 7, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Anesthesia quality and safety have improved over the past decades, thanks to improved monitoring devices. No nociception monitoring is currently part of the standard of care. Usually, hemodynamic parameters are used to evaluate nociception (heart rate, HR, and mean arterial pressure, MAP), but none of them are specific. However, nociception evaluation is critical. Indeed, where excess of nociception can lead to arterial hypotension and respiratory depression, insufficient nociception can lead to acute postoperative pain, which is followed by persistent chronic pain in 10-50% of patients. Different monitoring devices have been developed but none of them are still used in current practice. Recently developed, the nociception level (NoL) index (MEDASENSE BIOMETRICS Ltd®, Ramat Gan, Israel) is an index of nociception, based on a nonlinear algorithm combination of heart rate, heart rate variability, photoplethysmograph wave amplitude, skin conductance, skin conductance fluctuations, and their time derivatives. Robotic surgeries have started to spread over the world 20 years ago, claiming to be mini-invasive with less hemorrhage complications, with better success based on the technical advantages of the robot allowing better access during anatomical challenges procedures. Robotic surgery has been suggested to decrease pain during surgery and post-operatively, because of the decreases abdominal wall constraints induced by the robotic arms compared to the surgeon arms. This observational prospective non-interventional monocentric study intend to evaluate the performance of the NoL index to discriminate protocol-defined nociceptive from non nociceptive stimuli during robotic surgery. All patients, scheduled for a robotic surgery procedure, will be orally informed about the study during the anesthesia consultation. During the procedure, the anesthesia procedure will be the same for all patients, as part of the usual care in our department. The NoL monitor will be added for the purpose of this study, but the results will be hidden from all physicians. All settings will be left the physician in charge. At the end of the surgical procedure, before transfer to the recovery room, data for the monitor will be extracted on a dedicated universal serial bus (USB) key. Files will be safely stored under RedCap before analysis.