Clinical Trials Logo

Anesthesia, Spinal clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Anesthesia, Spinal.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04050059 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Comparison of Two Analgesic Pretreatment Techniques Before Spinal Needle Insertion for Pain Reduction and Maternal Satisfaction Level Assessment in Women Undergoing LSCS.

Start date: November 13, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Nowadays lower segment cesarean sections are preferably carried out under regional anesthesia due to multiple advantages. Local infiltration of lidocaine or any other anesthetic is used before lumber puncture in many centers to reduce needle stick pain. EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetic) cream is the combination of lidocaine and prilocaine which have been effectively used in few studies to reduce needle prick pain. We would like to see which analgesic pretreatment is superior in terms of reducing pain of spinal needle insertion and have better maternal satisfaction levels.

NCT ID: NCT03984526 Completed - Bradycardia Clinical Trials

Atropine or Ephedrine Pretreatment for Preventing Bradycardia in Elderly Patients

Start date: June 25, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Spinal anesthesia is widely used for lower extremity surgery, and sedation is often required during surgery. For sedation, propofol, midazolam and dexmedetomidine are frequently used. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 receptor agonist, and has sedating and analgesic effect. Compared with propofol and midazolam, it has little or no respiratory inhibition and hemodynamically stable. It also has the effect of reducing delirium in the elderly. Dexmedetomidine has also been reported to prolong the duration of sensory and motor blockade effects of spinal anesthesia. However, several studies have reported that administration of dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia increases the incidence of bradycardia. In a study of healthy young adults, concurrent administration of atropine with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia significantly reduced the frequency of bradycardia requiring treatment. However, in elderly patients, it is often reported that there is little response to atropine in bradycardia, and ephedrine is more effective in treating bradycardia than atropine in the elderly. The investigators therefore compared ephedrine and atropine as pretreatment to reduce the incidence of bradycardia when using dexmedetomidine as a sedative in elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT03967288 Suspended - Anesthesia, Spinal Clinical Trials

Comparison of Clorotekal and Bupivacaine for Short Obstetric Surgery

CLIMB
Start date: October 24, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The following obstetric procedures are commonly performed with spinal anesthesia on labor and delivery: bilateral tubal ligation, external cephalic version, cerclage insertion, cerclage removal, minimally invasive fetal surgery, and evacuation of retained products of conception. Bupivacaine is currently the standard spinal medication for these procedures because of its long history of safe use, its low incidence of transient neurologic symptoms, and its ability to provide a dependable, dense block with a high degree of maternal satisfaction. While bupivacaine has the aforementioned advantages, it unfortunately has a long duration of action, up to 240-380 minutes, which far exceeds the time necessary to complete most obstetric procedures. Clorotekal®, the first Food and Drug Administration approved chloroprocaine solution created for spinal injection, is a potential alternative. When compared with bupivacaine spinals, chloroprocaine spinals have been shown to facilitate clinically significant shorter times to resolution of motor and sensory block, first ambulation, micturition, and discharge readiness. The objective of this study is to determine if a strategy of spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine will reduce the duration of motor block, compared with equivalent block with hyperbaric bupivacaine..

NCT ID: NCT03959644 Completed - Anesthesia, Spinal Clinical Trials

Failure Rate in Spinal Blocks and Determination of Related Factors

Start date: May 10, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Investigators aimed to determine the rates of unsuccessful spinal anesthesia, to determine the factors related to failure and to determine the measures that may be taken to reduce this problem.

NCT ID: NCT03929874 Completed - Ultrasonography Clinical Trials

Ultrasound Image Study for Ultrasound-assisted Paramedian Spinal Anesthesia

Start date: May 2, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This prospective observational study aimed to obtain ultrasound images for ultrasound-assisted paramedian spinal anesthesia and identify the differences according to sidedness of approach, position and age.

NCT ID: NCT03792191 Completed - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Ultrasonography Versus Palpation for Spinal Anesthesia in Obese Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

Start date: January 16, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study will compare between preprocedural ultrasonography and the conventional palpation technique for spinal anesthesia in obese parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery

NCT ID: NCT03497364 Recruiting - Cesarean Section Clinical Trials

Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section Without Prophylactical Prehydration and Vasopressors

CSEAFCSWPPAV
Start date: May 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hypotension is a common complication in pregnant women after spinal anesthesia and related with the dose of local anesthetic. Injecting small dose local anesthetic into subarachnoid space can decrease the incidence of hypotension, but increase the risk of incomplete analgesia and muscle relaxation. The investigators hypothesize there is an optimal dose of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for subarachnoid injection in pregnant women, which can cause enough anesthesia and obviously decrease the incidence of hypotension without prophylactical prehydration and vasopressors. To verify this hypothesis, full-term pregnant women who were scheduled for elective cesarean section were recruited.Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was performed for pregnant women after written informed consents. The dose of bupivacaine or ropivacaine is small and depends on height of pregnant women. The blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, SpO2 and fetal heart rate were recorded and the blood flow volume of uterine artery was monitored The sensory and motor block were evaluated. After delivery, umbilical blood samples were taken for blood gas analysis. APGAR scores and neurological behavior of infant were evaluated and recorded. In the intraoperative period, side-effects and requirement for sedation, epidural injection or general anesthesia were noted. The quality of anaesthesia (judged by the anaesthetist), the quality of muscle relaxation (judged by the surgeon) and the degree of intraoperative comfort (judged by the patient) were recorded as excellent, good, fair or poor.

NCT ID: NCT03491943 Completed - Ultrasonography Clinical Trials

Midline vs. Paramedian Approaches for US-assisted Spinal Anesthesia

Start date: April 27, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ultrasound has emerged as an useful tool for neuraxial blockade. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety between the midline approach and paramedian approach for ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia in adult patients.

NCT ID: NCT03459105 Completed - Scoliosis Clinical Trials

Ultrasound-assisted Versus Conventional Landmark-guided Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Abnormal Spinal Anatomy

Start date: March 13, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Spinal anesthesia can be challenging in patients with lumbar scoliosis or previous lumbar spine surgery. This study aims to evaluate whether the use of the ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia reduces the number of passes required to successful dural puncture compared with the conventional surface landmark-guided technique in patients with abnormal spinal anatomy.

NCT ID: NCT03399019 Recruiting - Sedation Clinical Trials

Bispectral Index(BIS) on Depth of Sedation With Dexmedetomidine, Propofol and Midazolam During Spinal Anesthesia

BIS
Start date: September 5, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is to investigate on the objective relevance between bispectral index (BIS) and Observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) scale in patients sedated with Midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia. Also, we will evaluate the reflection of actual sedation levels on BIS monitoring.