View clinical trials related to Anesthesia Recovery.
Filter by:Emergence agitation; generally refers to a situation that may occur after a surgical intervention or anesthesia. This situation describes the irritability and agitation of the patient during the recovery process and the period of recovery from anesthesia. Recovery agitation may occur when the patient begins to recover and is usually a short-term condition. It resolves spontaneously. However, in some cases, this agitation may be more pronounced and disturbing. This may affect the patient's condition and relaxation. Rapid recovery from anesthesia in the clinic is also a risk factor for agitation. When the literature is examined, there are not enough studies on Bis suppression ratio and its relationship with recovery agitation is not yet known enough. For this purpose, our study aimed to question this relationship.
The purpose of this research is to compare the effect of different procedural sequences on the time to recovery and the propofol sedation requirements in patients undergoing bidirectional endoscopy with sedation. The two sequences are: - Colonoscopy followed by Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) - EGD followed by Colonoscopy
Background: The removal of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in children may be associated with respiratory adverse events. The incidence of these adverse events may be influenced by the type of anesthesia maintenance. It is not clear whether Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol is associated with a lower incidence of respiratory events upon removal of LMA as compared to maintenance with sevoflurane. Specific Aim: The primary aim of this study is to compare the prevalence of respiratory adverse events following LMA removal in patient receiving TIVA versus sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia in a pediatric population aged between 6 month and 6 years old. Secondary outcomes include quality of induction, maintenance and emergence from anesthesia between the 2 groups as evidenced by ease of LMA insertion, absence of bucking or movement during the procedure, time to LMA removal, and absence of emergence agitation. Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, children will be enrolled in one of two groups: Group 1 will receive propofol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia, Group 2 will receive sevoflurane for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. In both groups patients will be mechanically ventilated. At the end of the procedure, LMAs will be removed when patients are fully awake as defined by the return of reflexes, eye opening, and purposeful movements. Significance: Data comparing the influence of TIVA and sevoflurane on the occurrence of respiratory adverse events after LMA removal are limited. Both techniques are standard of care at our institution. However, as per our clinical observations, we hypothesize that TIVA is superior to sevoflurane. This study will identify the technique that provides optimal anesthetic conditions and improved patient's safety.
Database registering demographic patient data, anesthesia and surgery information, post operative recovery and complications if any.
Prospective Randomized non inferiority Trial involving adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.56 Patients will be enrolled in 2 groups : full dose sugammadex vs half dose sugammadex for reversal of NMB.
In a prospective randomized clinical trial involving adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, the investigators will enroll 216 patients, and evaluate 3 doses of prophylactic dexmedetomidine as a means to reduce postoperative shivering and quality of emergence from anesthesia versus placebo.