Articaine Infiltration in Anesthetizing Mandibular Second Primary Molars

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Background: Articaine hydrochloride has steadily grown in popularity, and studies have shown that articaine hydrochloride performs better than lidocaine due to an enhanced anes-thetic efficacy. The most common technique to anesthetize mandibular primary teeth is in-ferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) which induces a relatively sustained anesthesia and in turn may potentially traumatize soft-tissues. Therefore, the need of having an alternative technique of anesthesia with a shorter term but the same efficacy is reasonable. Aim: Evaluating The effectiveness of Articaine infiltration versus conventional inferior al-veolar nerve block in anesthetizing the second primary mandibular molars during pulpoto-my procedure. Materials and Methods: The study will be two-arm randomized controlled clinical trial, parallel design and it will be setup and reported according the CONSORT guidelines. A total of 52 healthy children aged 5-6 years, will be selected from Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. Children will be selected with scores 3 or 4 according to Frankl behavioral rating scale. Each child selected will have at least one mandibular second primary molar that is indicat-ed for pulpotomy. Written informed consent will be obtained from guardian. Participants will be randomly and equally allocated to one of the two arms into two groups according to the technique of anesthesia that will be used. Group I (Experimental group n =26) assigned to articaine infiltration anesthesia, while group II (Control group n = 26) assigned to the conventional IANB injection articaine. Pain will be assessed by three diferent methods: physiological method using the Heart rate as vital parameter of pain, and will be recorded at base line, during injection, pulpotomy and stainless steel crown (SSC) preparation. Objective method using Sensory, Eye, Motor (SEM) scale, and subjective method where the pain will be evaluated by asking the child to express his experience using a modified face scale from the Maunuksela scale

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Anesthesia, Local

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06201949
Study type	Interventional
Source	Alexandria University
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	March 16, 2023
Completion date	June 30, 2023

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT03663478` - Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04513652` - A Study of the Safety and Anesthetic Effect of AG-920 Topical Ophthalmic Solution	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT05464862` - The Effect of PPB Using 10, 20 and 30 ml of Lidocaine, Study on Volunteers	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04690647` - The Efficacy of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Analgesia After Elective Total Hip Replacement.	N/A
Completed	`NCT03245359` - Pain Management After TKA: Comparison of Short- and Long-term Nerve Blocks	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06028126` - Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Cardiac Surgery Trial	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05815563` - Validation of Peripheral Perfusion Index in Predicting Successful Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Pediatrics
Completed	`NCT01418690` - Changes in Tissue Oxygenation Following Regional Anesthesia	N/A
Suspended	`NCT03291691` - Protective Nerve Stimulation in Regional Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03545516` - Wound Infiltration as Part of an Opioid Free Pain Management Pathway Following Cesarean Delivery	Phase 2
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05038007` - Pain After Lung Cancer Surgery - Comparing Traditional Versus Prolonged Release Nerve Blockades	Phase 2
Terminated	`NCT03672500` - Perineal Local Infiltration Study	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT06057090` - Do Therapy Dogs Improve Behavior and Reduce Anxiety in Pediatric Dental Patients?	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05415865` - The Effect of Local Anesthetic Solution in the Bladder Prior to Botox Injections in the Bladder	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT06011005` - Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Topical Anesthesia Application on the Pain Perception During Intra-oral Injections in Children in Comparison to Benzocaine Gel.	N/A
Completed	`NCT04536311` - Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures While Awake or Under Appropriate Sedation by Paravertebral Block	N/A
Completed	`NCT03600454` - The Effect of Anesthesia on Perioperative Muscle Weakness and Neuro-endocrine Stress Response	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03159338` - Platelet-rich Fibrin on Nerve Regeneration After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT02966067` - A Split Mouth Trial to Compare Microneedles vs. Standard Needles in Dental Anaesthetic Delivery	N/A
Completed	`NCT03305666` - Trial of Injected Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Infusion After Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures	Phase 4

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.