Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06107660
Other study ID # HHC-2023-0204
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date December 2023
Est. completion date December 2025

Study information

Verified date October 2023
Source Hartford Hospital
Contact Heeren Makanji, MD
Phone 860-549-8252
Email Heeren.Makanji@hhchealth.org
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different medications used to reduce pain during lower back fusion surgery. The main questions this study aims to answer are: 1. Can liposomal bupivacaine, when included in a regional anesthesia technique called the Erector Spinae Plane block (ESPB), reduce opioid use post-operatively compared to the standard medication typically used in an ESPB (bupivacaine with stabilizing agents)? 2. Do patients report lower pain and better satisfaction with their surgery when they receive liposomal bupivacaine in the ESPB compared to those that receive the standard medication? Participants will be randomized to into two groups one that receives liposomal bupivacaine and one group that receives bupivacaine with stabilizing agents. Other than the randomization all patients will follow current standard of care at our hospital, and will not be asked to complete any additional study forms in addition to forms currently asked of all patients as per standard of care.


Description:

The purpose of this study is to improve pain management for patients having spine fusion surgery. This aim will be achieved by evaluating how well liposomal bupivacaine (LB), an FDA approved numbing medication that can provide pain relief for up to 72 hours after surgery, works when used as a single dose in a regional block known as Erector Spinae Plane block (ESPB). ESPB is a regional anesthesia technique used to control pain after surgery by injecting numbing medication around the patient's back bones on both sides. The study will compare how well LB in ESPB works compared to the standard practice procedure, which involves administering the traditional numbing medication (bupivacaine) through the ESPB. These two medications will be evaluated in reducing postoperative opioid medication need to control postoperative pain, as the primary goal. This study seeks to understand whether an ESP block either with bupivacaine and stabilizing agents or using liposomal bupivacaine, reduces the total amount of opioid medication used postoperatively, reduces pain scores, and leads to better patient reported outcome scores, patient satisfaction, and reduced recovery time in the PACU. Should the investigator find that liposomal bupivacaine is not superior to bupivacaine with stabilizing agents, this information would prove useful in regards to analgesic options for this patient population and could lead to a substantial cost savings.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date December 2025
Est. primary completion date June 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 30 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Lumbar pathology requiring a single or two level elective posterior based (i.e. posterior or transforaminal approach) spine fusion with or without an interbody device. - Surgical approach through either a midline or paramedian incision - Primary fusion surgery, previous decompression surgery is acceptable - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 1,2,or 3. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients currently on narcotic pain medication for pain management - Patients with a history of illicit drug use - Patients with neuromuscular disorders or neurological deficits (i.e. post polio or myasthenia gravis) - Patients confined to a wheelchair for over 6 months - Patients with fibromyalgia or other chronic pain disorder - Patient with contraindications for use of the ESP block (i.e. local skin infection over the area of needle entry, or anaphylactic reaction to bupivacaine) - Non-invasive surgical approaches - Repeat or revision surgery - Non-posterior spine surgical approaches (i.e. lateral, oblique, anterior, anterior and posterior approaches) - Staged procedures - Adjacent segment surgery - Patients with a weight less than 40kg to avoid local anesthetic systematic toxicity.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Liposomal bupivacaine
Patients will receive either liposomal bupivacaine as part of the ESPB .
Bupivacaine
This is the control group comparator as this is standard of care at the investigator's institution.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Hartford Hospital

References & Publications (1)

Makanji HS, Solomito MJ, Maffeo-Mitchell C, Esmende S, Finkel K. Utility of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management and Opioid Reduction Following Lumbar Fusions. Clin Spine Surg. 2023 May 1;36(4):E131-E134. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001387. Epub 2022 Sep 13. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Opioid Use Opioid Use in patient stay measured in morphine milligram equivalents 72 hours (standard inpatient stay)
Secondary Pain Report at Rest-Immediate postop Pain as measured using Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) while patient is at rest immediate postoperative. The minimum value on the NPS is 0 indicating no pain (best outcome) and 10 indicates severe pain (worst outcome) Asked immediately after surgery while patient is recovering in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
Secondary Pain Report with activity-Immediate postop Pain as measured using Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) while patient is active immediate postoperative. The minimum value on the NPS is 0 indicating no pain (best outcome) and 10 indicates severe pain (worst outcome) Patient is asked their pain level once they have been moved to their hospital room from the PACU. Typically this occurs within 5 hours of surgery.
Secondary Pain Report at Rest-Post op day 1 Pain as measured using Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) while patient is at rest 24 hours after surgery. The minimum value on the NPS is 0 indicating no pain (best outcome) and 10 indicates severe pain (worst outcome). 24 hours post-op
Secondary Pain Report with activity-Post op day 1 Pain as measured using Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) with activity 24 hours after surgery. The minimum value on the NPS is 0 indicating no pain (best outcome) and 10 indicates severe pain (worst outcome). 24 hours post-op
Secondary Pain Report at rest-at discharge Pain as measured using Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) while patient is at rest at discharge. The minimum value on the NPS is 0 indicating no pain (best outcome) and 10 indicates severe pain (worst outcome). 72 hours post-op
Secondary Pain Report with activity-at discharge Pain as measured using Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) with activity at discharge. The minimum value on the NPS is 0 indicating no pain (best outcome) and 10 indicates severe pain (worst outcome). 72 hours post-op
Secondary PACU recovery time Time from entry into PACU to time patient is listed as recovered <5 hours post op
Secondary Patient Statisfcation Based on Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey. The minimum score is 0 (very poor) while the maximum score is 100 (very good). 10-14 days post-op
Secondary Patient reported outcomes score Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. The minimum ODI score is 0 and represents minimal disability, while the maximum score of 100 represents the worst outcome - bed-bound significant disability. 3 months post-op
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03663478 - Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section Phase 4
Completed NCT04513652 - A Study of the Safety and Anesthetic Effect of AG-920 Topical Ophthalmic Solution Phase 3
Completed NCT05464862 - The Effect of PPB Using 10, 20 and 30 ml of Lidocaine, Study on Volunteers Phase 4
Completed NCT04690647 - The Efficacy of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Analgesia After Elective Total Hip Replacement. N/A
Completed NCT03245359 - Pain Management After TKA: Comparison of Short- and Long-term Nerve Blocks N/A
Recruiting NCT06028126 - Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Cardiac Surgery Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05815563 - Validation of Peripheral Perfusion Index in Predicting Successful Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Pediatrics
Completed NCT01418690 - Changes in Tissue Oxygenation Following Regional Anesthesia N/A
Suspended NCT03291691 - Protective Nerve Stimulation in Regional Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting NCT03545516 - Wound Infiltration as Part of an Opioid Free Pain Management Pathway Following Cesarean Delivery Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05038007 - Pain After Lung Cancer Surgery - Comparing Traditional Versus Prolonged Release Nerve Blockades Phase 2
Terminated NCT03672500 - Perineal Local Infiltration Study N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06057090 - Do Therapy Dogs Improve Behavior and Reduce Anxiety in Pediatric Dental Patients? N/A
Recruiting NCT05415865 - The Effect of Local Anesthetic Solution in the Bladder Prior to Botox Injections in the Bladder Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06011005 - Efficacy of Ethyl Chloride Topical Anesthesia Application on the Pain Perception During Intra-oral Injections in Children in Comparison to Benzocaine Gel. N/A
Completed NCT04536311 - Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures While Awake or Under Appropriate Sedation by Paravertebral Block N/A
Completed NCT03600454 - The Effect of Anesthesia on Perioperative Muscle Weakness and Neuro-endocrine Stress Response N/A
Recruiting NCT03159338 - Platelet-rich Fibrin on Nerve Regeneration After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy N/A
Completed NCT02966067 - A Split Mouth Trial to Compare Microneedles vs. Standard Needles in Dental Anaesthetic Delivery N/A
Completed NCT03305666 - Trial of Injected Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Infusion After Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures Phase 4