PDL Anesthesia Versus Local Infiltration

Anesthesia, Local Clinical Trial

— PDL  

Official title:

Periodontal Ligament Injection Versus Routine Local Infiltration, for the Non-surgical Single Posterior Maxillary Permanent Tooth Extraction: Comparative Double Blinded Randomized Clinical Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03173898
• Other study ID #: RF: 10/2015/15791
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: May 28, 2017
• Last updated: June 1, 2017
• Start date: July 6, 2015
• Est. completion date: January 31, 2016

Study information

• Verified date: May 2017
• Source: University of Jordan
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The literature concerning the success and pain scores of PDL injection technique compared with other techniques remains controversial; whereas some studies found no significant difference in pain scores between local infiltration and PDL injection, other older studies found that pain during administration of PDL injection was described by the majority of patients either as greater than local infiltration6, or as negligible or as a less painful injection compared with other injection techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of and patients' subjective responses to the PDL injection technique as compared to the traditional infiltration injection, for the non-surgical extraction of one posterior maxillary permanent tooth.

Description:

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of and patients' subjective responses to the periodontal ligament (PDL) anesthetic injection as compared to the traditional infiltration injection, for the non-surgical extraction of one posterior maxillary permanent tooth. Methods: All patients scheduled for non-surgical symmetrical maxillary posterior permanent teeth extraction in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) at the University of Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan, over a-seven-month period, were invited to participate in this prospective randomized double blinded, split mouth study. Every patient received the recommended volumes of 2% lidocaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine for PDL injection on the experimental side, and for local infiltration on the control side. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) were used to describe the pain felt during injection and extraction, respectively. Statistical significance was based on probability values of <0.05 and measured using Chi-Square and Student-t tests, and Nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 55
• Est. completion date: January 31, 2016
• Est. primary completion date: January 31, 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 12 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria were: patients who were fit for surgery under LA (classified by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I-ASA III); patients exhibiting full understanding of given oral instructions; and bilateral symmetrical posterior maxillary permanent teeth referred for non-surgical extractions under LA.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria were: the presence of acute dento-alveoalr infection; patients requiring conscious sedation or general anesthesia; patients unwilling to participate in the study; patients with ASA greater than III; patients on anti-inflammatory or recreational drugs; and patients requiring more than two additional injections in one or both sides for incomplete anesthesia.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Anesthesia, Local

Intervention

Procedure:
• PDL anesthesia versus local infiltration
Every patient received the recommended volumes of 2% lidocaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine for PDL injection on the experimental side, and for local infiltration on the control side. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to describe the pain felt during injection.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Jordan

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for injections pain	The VAS composed of a 100-mm line and allowed the patient to score the pain experienced during injections as low moderate and high	5 minutes