Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02635217
Other study ID # Bidirectional endoscopy study
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 2016
Est. completion date December 2017

Study information

Verified date May 2018
Source Queen's University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Upper endoscopies (Esophagogastroduodenoscopies-EGDs) as well as a lower endoscopies (Colonoscopies) are routinely performed by gastroenterologists to assess the lining of patients' upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts using a video endoscope (a long tube with a video camera on the end). An EGD is performed to examine the upper digestive tract to look for areas of inflammation, ulcerations, or other abnormalities in the swallowing tube, stomach, or duodenal lining. Similarly, a colonoscopy is performed to directly visualize the large bowel for polyps, inflammation, or other abnormalities in the lower bowel lining.

During these procedures, room air is routinely used to insufflate (expand/inflate the stomach and the colon) to allow for better viewing of the lining of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts; however, recently the use of carbon dioxide (CO2) (instead of air) has been shown to possibly have less post-procedure patient discomfort. Additionally, when both procedures are performed in the same day, it is currently unknown as to which sequence of procedures is better overall -whether to perform the EGD before colonoscopy or vice versa.

The overall aim of our research is to compare patients' comfort, total amount of sedation used, and overall satisfaction with the procedures between four randomly allocated groups, to see which method of insufflation and which procedural sequence is better when both procedures need to be performed in the same day. We hypothesize that in patients requiring same day endoscopies, performing an EGD prior to Colonoscopy with carbon dioxide (CO2) used as an insufflator is the best tolerated sequence associated with decreased sedation use and increased patient satisfaction/comfort.


Description:

Same day bi-directional endoscopies (EGD-esophagogastro-duodenoscopies and colonoscopies) are routinely performed in endoscopy units. Little however is known if the order of sequence of the two procedures (i.e. EGD (upper endoscopy) before colonoscopy (lower endoscopy) or vice-versa) is of any consequence. Those who favor performing EGDs prior to colonoscopies (EGD first approach) argue that the sedation necessary for EGD is then carried over to the colonoscopy and thus allows for a better tolerated colonoscopy. Additionally, abdominal bloating caused by insufflation of air during colonoscopy could lead to reduced tolerance of the subsequent EGD. Others however, argue that the gaseous distention of the small intestine caused by performing the EGD first leads to a more difficult and uncomfortable colonoscopy thereafter, likely due to a mechanical effect of air migrating to the proximal colon. Studies comparing procedural sequences in same day endoscopies have revealed conflicting results to date.

Some studies show that using the EGD first approach before allows for better procedural quality, decreased overall patient discomfort, less sedation, and a much higher chance of determining the diagnosis in the undifferentiated patient (e.g. occult GI bleeding). Other studies either show no difference in overall patient discomfort and satisfaction between both procedures, or even preference for colonoscopy before EGD. While some of these studies use moderate sedation, others use no sedation at all making generalization of these results difficult.

The use of carbon dioxide (CO2) for insufflation during upper and lower endoscopies has recently become popular over traditionally used room air, especially after studies revealed lesser post-procedure patient discomfort with the use of CO2. Whether its use affects the preferred sequence of procedures is still unknown.

Institutional variation across Canada regarding the sequence of procedures for same day bidirectional endoscopies is currently based on a combination of personal preferences and the few studies available. Given the absence of any formal guidelines in this area, we undertake the current study to test the hypothesis: In patients requiring same day bi-directional endoscopies, performing an EGD prior to Colonoscopy with carbon dioxide (CO2) used as an insufflator is the best tolerated sequence associated with decreased sedation use and increased patient satisfaction/comfort.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date December 2017
Est. primary completion date November 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- any patient with a clinical indication for receiving same day bi-directional endoscopies.

Exclusion Criteria:

- prior bowel or gastrointestinal surgery(s) (exception: appendectomy, cholecystectomy, hernia repair)

- known obstructive or cancerous lesions,

- active inflammatory bowel disease,

- hereditary polyposis syndromes,

- allergies to fentanyl and/or midazolam (SOC endoscopy sedatives),

- difficulties with communication or conditions affecting ability to provide informed consent,

- neurologic conditions that affect breathing (e.g. GBS, ALS or myasthenia gravis),

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Carbon dioxide insufflation
using an automated carbon dioxide insufflator the gas will be infused on demand during the endoscopies
room air insufflation
using standard care room air will be infused on demand
Procedure:
EGD (Esophagogastroduodenoscopy) before Colonoscopy
the order of endoscopies will be randomized as well
Colonoscopy before EGD (Esophagogastroduodenoscopy)


Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Hotel Dieu Hospital Kingston Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Queen's University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (12)

Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, Dufrayne F, Bergman G. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Sep;52(3):346-52. — View Citation

Carter D, Lahat A, Papageorgiou NP, Goldstein S, Eliakim R, Bardan E. Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day consecutive bidirectional endoscopy using moderate sedation: a prospective randomized study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;48(3):236-40. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182a87e5f. — View Citation

Cho JH, Kim JH, Lee YC, Song SY, Lee SK. Comparison of procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy without benzodiazepine and propofol sedation: starting at the bottom or the top. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 May;25(5):899-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06157.x. — View Citation

Choi JS, Youn YH, Lee SK, Choi JY, Kim HM, Kim YJ, Han KJ, Cho HG, Song SY, Cho JH. Which should go first during same-day upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy? A randomized prospective study focusing on colonoscopy performance. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):2209-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2741-2. Epub 2013 Jan 26. — View Citation

Hsieh YH, Lin HJ, Tseng KC. Which should go first during same-day bidirectional endosocopy with propofol sedation? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Oct;26(10):1559-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06786.x. — View Citation

Kavitha K, Bharathi R, et. al Same Day Dual Endoscopy: Does the Sequence Matter? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (abstract) 63.5 (2006) AB 145.

Kurien M, Din S, Dear KL, Elphick DA. Same day bidirectional endoscopy - does the procedural order matter? J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2012 Sep;21(3):328. — View Citation

Munson GW, Van Norstrand MD, O'donnell JJ, Hammes NL, Francis DL. Intraprocedural evaluation of comfort for sedated outpatient upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: the La Crosse (WI) intra-endoscopy sedation comfort score. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 Jul-Aug;34(4):296-301. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3182248777. — View Citation

Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Apr;59(4):482-6. Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Aug;60(2):326. — View Citation

Rostom A, Ross ED, Dubé C, Rutter MD, Lee T, Valori R, Bridges RJ, Pontifex D, Webbink V, Rees C, Brown C, Whetter DH, Kelsey SG, Hilsden RJ. Development and validation of a nurse-assessed patient comfort score for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Feb;77(2):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.003. — View Citation

Sajid MS, Caswell J, Bhatti MI, Sains P, Baig MK, Miles WF. Carbon dioxide insufflation vs conventional air insufflation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;17(2):111-23. doi: 10.1111/codi.12837. Review. — View Citation

Zuckerman G, Benitez J. A prospective study of bidirectional endoscopy (colonoscopy and upper endoscopy) in the evaluation of patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Jan;87(1):62-6. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Overall patient satisfaction Validated patient questionnaires administered to patients after both procedures are complete (on Day 0) followed by a recall interview via phone (on Day 7 after the procedures). Day 0 (post procedure)
Secondary sedation use Total sedation calculated as a total cumulative dose administered. day 0 (day of procedure)
Secondary patient comfort Patient comfort assessed by the nurses during the procedures using previously validated assessment scales. day 0
Secondary Patient satisfaction Day 7
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT00801931 - Double Cord Blood Transplant for Patients With Malignant and Non-malignant Disorders Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02948283 - Metformin Hydrochloride and Ritonavir in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Phase 1
Completed NCT03341338 - Genes-in-Action - Hepcidin Regulation of Iron Supplementation
Completed NCT00060398 - Epoetin Alfa With or Without Dexamethasone in Treating Fatigue and Anemia in Patients With Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05384691 - Efficacy of Luspatercept in ESA-naive LR-MDS Patients With or Without Ring Sideroblasts Who do Not Require Transfusions Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT06309641 - Methemoglobinemia Following Intravenous Iron Treatment
Completed NCT03822884 - Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study of 3 Subcutaneous Single Dose Epoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT02930850 - Spot-Check Noninvasive Hemoglobin (SpHb) Clinical Validation N/A
Completed NCT02912494 - A Phase III Study of JR-131 in Renal Anemia Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Phase 3
Completed NCT02912533 - A Long-term Study of JR-131 in Renal Anemia Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Phase 3
Completed NCT02888171 - Impact of Ferric Citrate vs Ferrous Sulfate on Iron Parameters and Hemoglobin in Individuals With CKD and Iron Deficiency N/A
Completed NCT02384122 - Efficacy of Octreotide on Blood and Iron Requirements in Patients With Anemia Due to Angiodysplasias Phase 3
Completed NCT02603250 - Evaluation of Hemoglobin Measurement Tools for Child Anemia Screening in Rwanda N/A
Completed NCT02176759 - Iron Absorption From Rice Fortified With Ferric Pyrophosphate N/A
Completed NCT02310113 - Transfusion and Skeletal Muscle Tissue Oxygenation N/A
Withdrawn NCT01934842 - A Study to Compare Analyte Levels in Blood Collected Using an Investigational Collection Device With a Commercial Predicate N/A
Completed NCT01922479 - Pilot Study of Ferric Carboxymaltose to Treat Iron Deficiency in Asians With Heart Failure Phase 4
Completed NCT01693029 - Study to Compare Safety and Efficacy of HX575 Epoetin Alfa and US-licensed Epoetin Alfa Phase 3
Terminated NCT01535781 - Study of the Effect of Tranexamic Acid Administered to Patients With Hip Fractures. Can Blood Loss be Reduced? N/A
Completed NCT01432717 - Study of ACE-536 in Healthy Postmenopausal Women Phase 1