View clinical trials related to Anaphylaxis.
Filter by:There is an ongoing debate whether antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers and/or angiotensin converting Enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors comprises a risk factor for more severe and more frequent side-effects during venom immunotherapy (VIT). In the literature, data are controversial and originate from case reports or statistically underpowered studies; the number of included patients was usually high but the proportion of patients on antihypertensive treatment was low ranging from 2-11%. The study was conducted as a prospective, observational, European multicenter study. 1425 patients, aged from 35 to 85 years, with a history of an anaphylactic reaction due to bee or wasp stings, were included. The medical history was recorded as well as laboratory parameters and data of the VIT-updosing phase. One year after reaching the maintenance dose, possible side-effects during VIT as well as the outcome of field stings or sting challenges were documented.
To assess the drug exposure profile in systemic circulation of Primatene Mist by inhalation, versus Epinephrine by intramuscular injection, and ProAir HFA by inhalation in healthy adults.
Anaphylaxis is an allergic reaction potentially fatal. The treatment is based on injection of epinephrin as soon as possible. Guidelines by the World Allergic Organisation highlight the importance of medical follow-up. This follow-up consists of an allergy consultation, the prescription and demonstration of epinephrin auto-injector and the implementation of specific measures in schools. There is no study about the recurrence of anaphylactic reaction outside the hospital. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the allergy follow-up of children after anaphylactic reaction. The secondary objective is to evaluate the use of medical advice in case of recurrence of anaphylactic reaction. Investigators will use a phone call questionnaire for parents of children who underwent an anaphylactic reaction between the 1st July 2014 and the 31st June 2016 treated in the Paediatric Emergency Department in Femme-Mère-Enfant Hospital in Lyon in France. 179 children could be included in the study.
Study clinical characteristics and phenotypes of patients diagnosed with NSAID sensitivity in Thailand
- To study Major allergen in Wheat anaphylaxis in Thai population - To study and compare demographic data between group of wheat anaphylaxis
Activation of mast cells in the immune system is known to cause allergic reactions sometimes with severe systemic symptoms. The investigators have recently developed a blood-based mast cell activation diagnostic test in which levels of functional activation in-vitro in primary cultured mast cells generated from the peripheral blood of single individuals can be assessed. It is the hypothesis that the test can be used to predict the potential state of in-vivo mast cell activation in any individual based on the functional activation profiles exhibited by their cultured mast cells. The investigators now wish to translate their in-vitro findings in a pilot study to disease groups where mast cell activation is expected to be high. These include highly allergic individuals; those with chronic idiopathic urticaria; those with mastocytosis; and those with the mast cell activation syndrome. Furthermore, they will use the functional genomics approach to identify gene expression biomarkers that are correlated with such diseases. The results will be compared with data that have been collected from a cohort of healthy control blood donors.
Perioperative anaphylaxis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Most textbooks describe it as a rare event of the order of 1 in 10 to 1 in 20,000 general anaesthetic cases. However, a recent study in the United Kingdom suggested that 1 in 350 cases have features suspicious of perioperative anaphylaxis. This study suggests that perioperative anaphylaxis may be under recognised and under reported. When perioperative anaphylaxis is recognised, it would be ideal to carry out investigations firstly to confirm the diagnosis of anaphylaxis and secondly to identify the causative agent. The latter can be difficult in the context of anaesthesia where the patient is exposed to several drugs and other reagents in a short space of time. One of the interesting aspects of perioperative anaphylaxis is that there is variability in its epidemiology between different countries, for example between the United Kingdom, France, Scandinavia and Australia and New Zealand. There are currently no data from Egypt to include in such comparisons and to inform clinical practice. As well as being at risk if a drug allergen is not identified, patients can also be at risk from an incorrect allergy label. The most common example of this is penicillin allergy where fewer than 10% of patients with a history of penicillin allergy are found to be allergic. Incorrect penicillin allergy labels are potentially harmful for patients attending for surgery because the label independently increases the risk of developing infection to resistant organisms, longer hospital stays and mortality.
Food allergy affects up to 2% of adults and 8% of children in the United Kingdom (UK), and is a major public health issue. It is the commonest cause of life-threatening allergic reactions (anaphylaxis), which can be fatal. Adrenaline (epinephrine) auto-injector (AAI) devices are the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, yet in a UK survey, over 80% of 245 teenagers experiencing anaphylaxis did not use their AAI. Delays in, or lack of adrenaline (epinephrine) administration during anaphylaxis are risk factors for fatal anaphylaxis. In 2010, a coroner's investigation into the death of a food-allergic teenager in the UK raised several questions around AAI safety and efficacy, since the teenager died despite administering her auto-injector device. This prompted a review by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in 2014 into the clinical and quality considerations of AAIs. Two recommendations which came from the review was that companies 'should be encouraged to develop a 0.5mg [dose] AAI.' In the UK currently only Emerade, one of the three companies selling AAIs, manufactures a 0.5mg (500mcg) version. Emerade also has a longer needle length (23mm) compared to other AAIs (typically 15mm). The investigators plan to formally assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of self-injection with intramuscular adrenaline (epinephrine) in teenagers at risk of anaphylaxis due to food allergy, and have been prescribed AAI. 1. The investigators will compare self-injection with 300mcg vs 500mcg in teenagers of body weight >40kg. In a 40kg person, an adrenaline dose of 300mcg results in an effective UNDER-dosing of 30% by body weight. 2. The investigators will also assess the impact of needle length on injection, by comparing two different devices, both of which deliver 300mcg, but one via a 15mm needle and the other with a 23mm needle.
A single dose, open label, randomized cross-over study to explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of epinephrine in healthy male and female subjects
This is a phase II open label study on the use of Ibrutinib on the inhibition of food-induced anaphylaxis in adults with food allergy. Ibrutinib (brand name Imbruvica) is currently FDA approved for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and Waldenstrom's macroglobulineia (WM). We propose to administer this approved drug to adults with food allergy to inhibit food allergy responses.