Clinical Investigation on Allergic-like Reactions and Oculo-respiratory Syndrome After the H1N1 Pandemic Vaccine

Allergy Clinical Trial

Official title:

Clinical Investigation of Anaphylaxis, Allergic-like Reactions and Oculo-Respiratory Syndrome (ORS) Following Administration of an Adjuvanted Vaccine Against H1N1 Pandemic Influenza

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01247415
• Other study ID #: pcirn-clin-invest-aller-1011
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: November 22, 2010
• Last updated: July 3, 2012
• Start date: January 2011
• Est. completion date: November 2012

Study information

• Verified date: July 2012
• Source: PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada: Ethics Review CommitteeCanada: Health Canada
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

During the 2009-2010 immunization campaign against pandemic H1N1, some people reported having allergic-like reactions (anaphylaxis(a shock-like reaction), hives, swelling, etc.). A vaccine allergy may be more or less severe or intense. Patients may have skin reactions (rash with or without itching), respiratory problems (cough, spasm of the airways), angioedema (swelling) of various body parts (face, eyelids, throat etc.) and circulatory problems (low blood pressure or shock). Anaphylaxis is a severe allergic reaction that can sometimes be fatal. Other people vaccinated against pandemic H1N1 had an oculo-respiratory syndrome. Oculo-respiratory syndrome (ORS) is also a reaction to the influenza vaccine, which includes symptoms such as bilateral conjunctivitis (red eyes) with swelling of the face or respiratory symptoms (chest tightness, coughing, a sensation of throat closure, difficulty swallowing, hoarseness, wheezing or difficulty breathing). The investigators know that ORS is not a true allergic reaction. Because many signs and symptoms of ORS are similar to those observed during an allergic reaction, it is often difficult to distinguish ORS from an allergic reaction.

This study will compare three groups of patients: those who had allergic-like reactions, those who had ORS and vaccinated individuals who had no such adverse events. Pregnant women cannot participate in this study. The study has three goals. First, the investigators want to determine, among those who had allergic-like reactions after influenza vaccination, what proportion (percentage) of these people are actually allergic to the vaccine or its components. Second, among those who are not allergic to the vaccine, which other processes may have caused these symptoms. Finally, the investigators will try to identify whether there are features that distinguish patients who have a true allergic reaction from those affected by ORS, and those that had no adverse events.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 138
• Est. completion date: November 2012
• Est. primary completion date: March 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 10 Years to 64 Years

Eligibility

case:

Inclusion Criteria:

• There will be three groups of cases. For all groups of cases, patients will be included if the time of onset of their first symptoms has been within 24 hours after vaccination and if they are between 10 and 64 years of age.

• Anaphylaxis: these patients will have to meet at least level 3 of diagnostic certainty according to the Brighton Collaboration criteria for anaphylaxis

• Allergic-like reactions: These patients will have to have displayed at least one sign or symptom of an allergic reaction (any of the minor or major criteria of anaphylaxis) but will exclude patients with conjunctivitis who will belong to the ORS group (see below).

• ORS cases: According to the Public Health Agency case definition, these patients should have presented a bilateral conjunctivitis plus =1 of the seven respiratory symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness, difficulty breathing, difficulty swallowing, hoarseness or sore throat) that started within 24 hrs of vaccination, with or without facial oedema (no restriction for duration)

• Controls will be individuals between 10 and 64 years of age who received the pH1N1 vaccine but did not present any of the above mentioned adverse events after their vaccine (anaphylaxis, allergic like reactions and SOR).

Exclusion Criteria:

-Pregnant women cannot participate in this study.

Study Design

Observational Model: Case Control, Time Perspective: Retrospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Allergic-like Reactions
• Allergy
• Anaphylaxis
• Oculorespiratory Syndrome
• Syndrome

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Centre Hospitalier Charles Lemoyne	Greenfield-Park	Quebec
Canada	Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal	Montréal	Quebec
Canada	Hôpitale Ste-Justine	Montréal	Quebec
Canada	Montreal Children's Hospital	Montréal	Quebec
Canada	Montreal General Hospital	Montréal	Quebec
Canada	Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec	Québec	Quebec
Canada	Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Sherbrooke	Sherbrooke	Quebec

Sponsors (20)

Lead Sponsor

Collaborator

PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network

British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, CHU de Québec, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Hopital Charles Lemoyne, Institut National en Santé Publique du Québec, IWK Health Centre, Laval University, McMaster University, Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC, Montreal General Hospital, Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), St. Justine's Hospital, Stollery Children's Hospital, Université de Montréal, University of British Columbia, University of Cincinnati, University of Manitoba, University of Toronto

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	proportion of individuals with IgE mediated allergic reaction	The overall objective of this clinical investigation is to estimate the proportion of individuals with IgE mediated allergic reaction to Arepanrix or its components among patients with anaphylaxis/allergic reaction after pH1N1 vaccination, and the proportion that are allergic to the 2010-2011 trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine (TIV).	one year	Yes
Secondary	Biomarkers that may allow differentiation between ORS and type I hypersensitivity	We will try to identify biomarkers that may allow differentiation of patients with ORS and those with type I hypersensitivity to the vaccine.	two year	Yes