Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT02994043 |
Other study ID # |
20-2550 |
Secondary ID |
R01AA024632 |
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 9, 2016 |
Est. completion date |
February 17, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2022 |
Source |
University of Colorado, Denver |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The goal of the AIM Study is to examine the effectiveness of Mindfulness Based Relapse
Prevention (MBRP) versus Relapse Prevention (RP) for the treatment of Alcohol Use Disorders
(AUD) by implementing an 8-week long intervention and examining neurobiological,
immunological, and epigenetic characteristics of AUD.
Description:
This study was designed to evaluate the effect of two outpatient, individually-administered,
psychosocial interventions (Relapse Prevention vs. Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention).
Participants are recruited via mass media advertisements, flyers, and local outreach to
clinical providers that do not address substance use. We will recruit 226 individuals. Our
previous experience with clinical trials, as well as the experience of our research team
members with these interventions support the feasibility of recruiting approximately 50
patients per year. This sample size provides adequate statistical power for the research
questions undertaken.
Participants are screened over the telephone and invited into the laboratory for a baseline
assessment. Immediately after the baseline assessment, they are randomized to a therapist and
then to a treatment condition. At the end of each year, the distribution of participants
across conditions and therapists are evaluated for imbalances. If attrition has resulted in
an imbalance across conditions, the randomization procedure will be adjusted to ensure equal
numbers of participants in RP and MBRP.
Within a week of completing the baseline assessments, participants are seen by their
individual therapist for a motivational interviewing, goal-setting session. After the
goal-setting session, the eight-session MBRP or RP treatments are administered. To ensure
that therapists adhere to treatment manuals, a checklist is provided consisting of the
primary content addressed each session (four to seven primary content pieces each session).
Further, questionnaires assessing mindfulness practice and facets of mindfulness (e.g., being
nonjudgmental, nonreactive) are administered at each assessment. At the most recent RPPR,
these questionnaires validated that participants in the MBRP condition were increasing in
some facets of mindfulness during treatment (and up to three months after treatment).
We estimate that the completion of assessments and procedures across the duration of the
trial, excluding therapy sessions, will total about 15 hours of time. To compensate subjects
for their time and travel costs, each subject will be paid $300 if they complete all
sessions.
We will conduct extensive analyses of any attrition encountered in the project to determine
bias. However, note that in each of the analyses described herein, we will have the
capability of using modern approaches to the handling of missing data including full
information maximum likelihood estimation of missing data within Proc Mixed in SAS and within
EQS.
The distributional properties of all continuously scaled variables will be examined for
skewness and kurtosis to determine the need for normalizing transformations or for
alternations to our analysis plan (i.e., generalized estimating equations or robust
estimation) prior to the primary analyses.
To confirm the validity of random assignment, pretest equivalence of the two treatment
conditions across demographics, drinking history, smoking, and all other baseline measures
will be assessed via t-tests on continuous items and c2 tests of categorical items. We will
use the Bonferroni approach to correct for alpha inflation with a familywise alpha of .05.
Any variables on which the two groups are unequal at pretest will be covariates in all
further analyses.
Attrition analyses will be conducted after each follow-up data collection effort to provide
assurance that differential attrition by treatment condition has not occurred. Following
previously published procedures, a series of ANOVAs of treatment (MBRP versus RP) X retention
(retained, not retained) will be conducted on continuous baseline measures. Significant
treatment X retention interactions identify measured variables on which differential
attrition may have occurred. The logit model analog procedure will be applied to categorical
baseline measures to test for differential attrition on categorical variables such as gender
and ethnicity. We will conduct these analyses to assure that differential attrition by
treatment condition does not account for any of the effects of the treatments.