Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05935124
Other study ID # 4222
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 1, 2015
Est. completion date November 2025

Study information

Verified date June 2023
Source Western Sydney Local Health District
Contact Kathleen Goodrick, BN
Phone 8890555
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A randomized controlled crossover study to determine if narrow band imaging or white light endoscopy is superior in detecting right colonic polyps in average risk subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy


Description:

Removal of colorectal adenomas prevents occurrence of cancers [1]. It is recognized that colonoscopy can miss colorectal adenomas and early cancers [2]. Proximal colon polyp detection rate is lower compared to distal colon detection rates. This may be partially due to the higher prevalence of flat polyps and sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) which are harder to visualize (3). There is a need to further improve performance of colonoscopy. A second evaluation of the right colon within the same procedure may yield an additional detection rate of 5-10%, however retro-flexion has not proven to be superior to a second forward viewing examination (4,5) The use of chromo-endoscopy has been shown to improve detection of flat adenomas [6]. Narrow band imaging was introduced in year 2006. It is similar to chromo-endoscopy in that it provides more mucosal details. This enables endoscopists to accurately describe the pit pattern of adenomas. NBI has been used as a substitute to chromo-endoscopy. In pooled analysis, NBI is comparable to chromo-endoscopy in their sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of malignant colorectal adenomas [7]. Unfortunately, the use of NBI has not been shown to conclusively improve rate of colorectal adenoma detection. Two of 3 randomized trials that compared WLE to NBI showed a higher adenoma detection rate with the use of NBI [8,9]. In a study by Rex et al., the rate was however similar with either modality. In a pooled analysis, NBI was only marginally better than WLE [10]. The effective use of NBI depends on the quality of bowel preparation and the experience of endoscopist. In the presence of fecal matters, NBI tends to be dark and detection of small adenomas becomes difficult. The prototype bright NBI coupled with high definition resolution is likely to overcome this drawback of original NBI.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 600
Est. completion date November 2025
Est. primary completion date May 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Asymptomatic subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy, age > 50. Avaverage risk subjects defined as those without a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease, colon adenoma or cancer or family history of FAP or Familial non-polyposis syndrome or first degree relatives having diagnosed to have colo-rectal carcinoma, no colonoscopy in past 5 years and, ability to provide a written consent to trial participation Exclusion Criteria: - unable to consent

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
WLE first, then B-NBI


Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Westmead Hospital Sydney New South Wales

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Western Sydney Local Health District

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Australia, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Rate of right sided polyp detection with WLE and B-NBI 1 day
Secondary Rate of the detection of SSPs in the right colon with WLE and B-NBI 1 day
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05178095 - Artificial Intelligence in Colonic Polyp Detection N/A
Completed NCT05862948 - Accuracy of Endo-aid in Consecutive Patients Referred for Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT04651062 - Detection of Adenomas in Screening Colonoscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT05158725 - Comparison of Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection Yield N/A
Completed NCT04979962 - AI Colorectal Polyp Detection N/A
Recruiting NCT04138030 - Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Lateral Spreading Lesions - A Randomised Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT06427109 - Omega-3 Fatty Acid and Colorectal Adenoma
Completed NCT03436004 - Evaluation of Colonoscopy With a Specific Device for the Detection of Adenomas N/A
Recruiting NCT05730192 - EAGLE Trial CADDIE Artificial Intelligence Endoscopy N/A
Completed NCT03254030 - Does Inspection of Colonic Mucosa During Insertion Improve Adenoma Detection? N/A
Completed NCT03119168 - Effect of Simethicone on Screening Colonoscopy Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT04710251 - Effectiveness of Using the Speedometer During Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT03814369 - AmplifEYE Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT04418843 - Cold EMR Vs Standard EMR for the Treatment of Large Nonpedunculated Homogeneous Colorectal Lesions N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05064124 - Early diAgnosis Real-Time Healthcare System for CANcer Trial
Completed NCT05941689 - Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Colonic Polyp Detection System N/A
Terminated NCT05732233 - RITUAL Ultivision AI CADe Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT04464135 - Effect of Water Exchange Plus Acetic Acid Staining on the Detection of Flat Polyps During Colonoscopy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03550625 - Computer Assisted Selection of Serrated Adenomas and Neoplastic Polyps - a New Clinical DRAft
Completed NCT05422820 - The Argentina Brief Colonoscopy Difficulty Score (ABCD)