View clinical trials related to Adenocarcinoma.
Filter by:Esophagectomy for benign or malignant disease of the esophagus can be performed using a transhiatal technique or Ivor Lewis technique (combined laparotomy with thoracotomy). These procedures can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality [1]. Advances in minimally invasive technology and surgical techniques have allowed us to explore the possibility of performing esophagectomy using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Minimally invasive esophagectomy represents a new alternative to conventional open esophagectomy. It is a technically demanding operation requiring advanced laparoscopic surgical skills, appropriate instrumentation, and thorough knowledge of open esophagectomy. Multiple authors have reported the use of video-assisted thoracoscopy or laparoscopy to facilitate esophagectomy [2-6]. Most of these reports have utilized a standard laparotomy in combination with thoracoscopy to perform esophageal mobilization or laparoscopy with a mini-laparotomy to perform esophagectomy. DePaula was the first to report a large series of 48 patients undergoing laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for benign (n=24) and malignant disease (n=24) [7]. In 2 patients, conversion to open surgery was required and 2 others required thoracoscopic assistance. Postoperative complications were low in the benign group but higher in the carcinoma group. The 30-day mortality rate was 16% in patients with carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. DePaula concluded that the patients who benefit most from this procedure are those with benign disease. Swanstrom recently reported nine cases of laparoscopic total esophagectomy [8]. There were no conversions to laparotomy. One patient required a right thoracoscopy with intrathoracic anastomosis due to poor viability of the gastric tube. The mean operative time was 6.5 hours with a mean hospital stay of 6.4 days. However, the advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomy have not been observed. The aim of this prospective trial is to evaluate the physiologic outcome, clinical outcome, and quality of life after combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy vs. transhiatal esophagectomy.
The principal objective of this study is to demonstrate that patients can safely receive combined High Dose Rate brachytherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy without experiencing a treatment limiting toxicity.
This phase II trial is studying how well sorafenib works in treating patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma. Sorafenib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor
This study is intended to establish the practicality of treating cancer in the liver with precisely administered single fractions of high-energy radiation using a radiosurgical (cross-firing) technique. A second purpose is to establish a safe dose for such therapy. Finally, the efficacy of radiosurgical ablation of liver tumors, in terms of radiographic response, will be measured.
Immunochemotherapy consisting of IL-2, INF-A, and VBL and 5FU is regarded as the treatment of choice in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. During the period 1996-2000, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of this immunochemotherapy, combined with an aggressive surgical approach: nephrectomy before treatment and resection of residual disease. The 3-year survival rate for the entire group and complete responder patients was 30% and 88%, respectively. The side effects were usually moderate and consisted mainly of a flu-like syndrome, headache, nausea, vomiting and depression. Most importantly, there was no drug-related death. Good performance status, absence of bone metastases and prior nephrectomy were associated with higher response rates. Capecitabine is a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate, orally administered and selectively activated to Fluorouracil by a sequential triple-enzyme pathway in liver and tumor cells. Capecitabine at dose of 2,500mg/m2/d divided equally into two daily doses for 14 days in patients who failed to respond to “standard” immunotherapy achieved a 30% objective response. Toxicity consisted of hand-foot syndrome. Aim of Study: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of the combination of IL-2, INF-A, VBL and Capecitabine in MRCC
The purpose of this research study is to find out if an experimental drug called PTK787/ZK222584 might be effective against advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. In order for tumors to grow and spread to other parts of the body, they need to have a growing blood supply. Tumor cells have been shown to produce substances that stimulate the abnormal growth of new blood vessels that allow the tumor to grow. In adults, blood vessel cells normally divide very rapidly. It is thought that PTK787/ZK222584 may interfere with the growth of new blood vessels. A drug that interferes with the growth of new blood vessels might stop tumor growth, and possibly shrink the tumor by keeping it from receiving nutrients and oxygen supplied by the blood vessels. Since normal blood vessel cells divide very rarely, it might be possible to stop tumor growth without harming normal tissues.
The purpose of this trial is to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with fixed doses of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic solid tumors or adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine as neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical resection in patients with newly diagnosed operable oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
This study looks at the effect of folate supplementation and depletion on the blood cells and the colorectal cells. To examine the effect of these changes, blood samples and colorectal biopsy samples are collected. The genetic material (RNA and DNA) is examined to see what changes occur during the depletion and supplementation of folate. The hypothesis is that folate may help prevent colon cancer
This randomized phase III trial studies oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, and bevacizumab to see how well they work compared to oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil in treating patients who have undergone surgery for stage II colon cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. It is not yet known whether giving combination chemotherapy together with bevacizumab is more effective than combination chemotherapy alone in treating colon cancer.