Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03650062
Other study ID # PI2016/69
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date May 30, 2017
Est. completion date February 3, 2019

Study information

Verified date February 2019
Source Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

The PAN-PROMISE study (PAtieNt-rePoRted OutcoMe scale in acute pancreatItis-an international proSpEctive cohort study) aims to measure an outcome variable in acute pancreatitis (AP) based in the patient´s experience. PAN-PROMISE is a cohort study involving patients with AP. The patient´s symptom perception will be compared with the opinion of the clinicians and with clinical outcomes.


Description:

Currently, the most important outcome variables in Acute Pancreatitis (AP) are persistent organ failure (POF) and mortality, according to the physician point of view. These variables occur infrequently (<10 and <5% respectively) (Sternby et all, see "References"), therefore, studies designed to assess the effectiveness of new treatments for AP to decrease POF or mortality require a very large sample of patients, which is unfeasible. Currently, clinical trials addressing the management of AP do not take into account Patient Reported Outcome Measures.

PROMS (Patient Reported Outcome Measures) have been defined as any report of the status of a patient's health condition that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else (first link in "References"). PROMS are gaining importance as a tool to design outcome variables. This kind of measurement has been recently included in the quality assesment approaches (Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, see "References"), being PROMS a useful tool to improve the triple aim framework of better quality, appropriate utilization, and enhanced patient experience (second link in "References"). The aim of PAN-PROMISE is to incorporate an outcome variable in AP based in the patient´s experience. For this purpose the investigators involved in this project have developed a new instrument based on symptoms found to be important for the patient. This new instrument is intended to be a simple quantitative variable, relevant for the patient, that can be useful to test new treatments for AP without the need for a very large sample size, fulfilling the requirements of the triple aim framework by incorporating an outcome measurement defined by the patient.

Hypothesis:

- PROMS must be incorporated to patient care and research in AP to improve the triple aim framework of better quality, appropriate utilization, and enhanced patient experience

- A PROMS scale is a useful outcome variable to investigate new treatments in AP

- The different severity categories of the revision of the Atlanta Classification (RAC) have different scores on the PROMS scale in acute pancreatitis: severe greater than moderate and mild, moderate greater than mild.

- Increasing scores on the PROMS scale are associated to increased morbidity

Aims:

- Main aim 1: to measure patient´s symptoms during an episode of AP and to correlate the intensity of these symptoms to clinical outcomes

- Main aim 2: to design and validate a PROMS scale in AP intended to be an suitable outcome variable in future trials addressing the management of AP

Methods

Part 1: development of the PAN-PROMISE instrument The PAN-PROMISE research team developed a qualitative study in which three nominal groups were conducted, two with patients who had suffered an acute pancreatitis (AP) in hospitals in Alicante (Universitarian General Hospital)), and Valencia (Clinic Hospital), Spain and another with clinicians from the Alicante region with experience in treating patients with AP. Participants were asked about the symptoms that cause the most discomfort and concern to patients at three specific times: before receiving treatment for AP, during hospital admission and after discharge. The perspectives of patients and professionals were compared. From the information gathered in the nominal groups, a first version of a PROMS questionnaire was elaborated and shared with an international group of gastroenterologists, experienced in the management of pancreatitis, from 4 countries (Germany, Spain, USA, India and Turkey) through an online application to determine to what extent these experiences were shared in frequency and intensity by patients in these different countries. With all this information, a PROMS instrument was generated.

Part 2: measurement of patient´s symptoms in an international cohort study

2.1 Design. The PAN-PROMISE instrument is being measured in patients participating in a multicenter international prospective cohort study. Consecutive adult patients with AP are eligible after signed informed consent.

2.2 Center recruitment The PAN-PROMISE study has been endorsed by the Spanish Association of Pancreatology (AESPANC), the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology (AEG) and the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP); these associations shared the project with their members and through their social networks, calling for researchers and centers to join this initiative. PAN-PROMISE has also a webpage www.promisepancreatitis.com to promote center recruitment.

2.3 Patient registry PAN-PROMISE measurement will rely on a patient registry hosted in the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology (AEG) REDCap node. AEG offered this REDCap web-based online patient registry tool at no cost. Claudia Sánchez-Marin, a gastroenterologist, is on charge of quality control (data validation, data checks, contact with researchers to solve issues). The REDCap online registry was designed with logical rules to ensure good quality data entry, including mandatory fields to enter, logical ranges for quantitative variables, alarms if logical rules are not coherent (for example to have persistent organ failure but to classify the episode as mild or moderate), expanding fields only available in the presence of certain circumstances (for example, detailed organ failure description is only available if the patient had organ failure).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 525
Est. completion date February 3, 2019
Est. primary completion date February 3, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 79 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients =18 and <80 years.

- Karnofsky performance status previous to AP 100 (normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease), 90 (able to carry on normal activity; minor signs or symptoms of disease) or 80 (normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms of disease).

- Acute pancreatitis defined as at least 2 of the following 3 criteria: A) Typical abdominal pain, B) Elevation of amylase and/or lipase more than 3 times the upper limit of normality, and C) Imaging (preferably CT and/or MR) compatible with AP.

- Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Time between onset of symptoms and presentation in the emergency room (ER) greater than 48 hours (we do not consider as onset of symptoms previous self-limited heraldic biliary pain)

- Recruitment >24h after presentation in the ER

- Karnofsky performance status previous to AP 70 (Cares for self; unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work) or less

- Inability to express or understand the instructions of the study (severe congenital or acquired intellectual deficit).

- More than 1 previous episode of AP.

- Chronic pancreatitis.

- Presence of diseases or conditions different from AP that may interfere with the scale: other causes of abdominal pain (especially acute cholecystitis; Note: choledocholithiasis-acute cholangitis is not an exclusion criteria), obstruction of the digestive tract (peptic pyloric stenosis, gastrointestinal anastomotic stenosis, diabetic gastroparesis, gastrointestinal neoplasia...), nausea-vomiting (brain tumor, chemotherapy...) or weakness (pre-existing anemia with Hb <9 mg/dL, heart failure or respiratory insufficiency associated with minimal effort dyspnea, or domiciliary treatment with O2, advanced neoplasms or other debilitating diseases).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Colombia Hospital Universitario San Ignacio Bogotá
Greece Attikon University Hospital Athens
Hungary Centre for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Pécs
Hungary University of Szeged Szeged
Italy Dip.Medicina-Università degli Studi di Verona Verona
Korea, Republic of Konkuk University School of Medicine Seoul
Lithuania Vilnius University Vilnius
Mexico Servicio de Cirugía General, IMSS, León Guanajuato
Poland Medical University of Lódz Lódz
Portugal Fernando Fonseca Hospital Amadora
Portugal Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu Viseu
Romania Emergency Hospital of Bucharest Bucharest
Romania Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca
Russian Federation Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Kaliningrad
Spain Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Alicante
Spain Hospital Santa María Lleida
Spain Hospital San Pedro Logroño
Spain Hospital Central de Asturias Oviedo
Spain Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra Pamplona
Spain Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago Santiago De Compostela
Spain Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid Valladolid
Spain Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro Vigo
Spain Hospital Lozano Blesa Zaragoza
Spain Hospital Miguel Servet Zaragoza
Ukraine Medical Institute Lviv Lviv
United States Johns Hopkins Medical Center Baltimore Maryland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Enrique de-Madaria

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Colombia,  Greece,  Hungary,  Italy,  Korea, Republic of,  Lithuania,  Mexico,  Poland,  Portugal,  Romania,  Russian Federation,  Spain,  Ukraine, 

References & Publications (2)

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. — View Citation

Sternby H, Bolado F, Canaval-Zuleta HJ, Marra-López C, Hernando-Alonso AI, Del-Val-Antoñana A, García-Rayado G, Rivera-Irigoin R, Grau-García FJ, Oms L, Millastre-Bocos J, Pascual-Moreno I, Martínez-Ares D, Rodríguez-Oballe JA, López-Serrano A, Ruiz-Rebol — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Severity of acute pancreatitis according to the revised Atlanta classification [incidence of local and/or systemic complications] Mild acute pancreatitis (no complications), moderately severe acute pancreatitis (local complications and/or transient (=48h) organ failure and/or exacerbation of previous comorbidity), severe acute pancreatitis (persistent (>48h) organ failure) (see revised Atlanta classification, Banks et al, Gut 2013) Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
Primary PAN-PROMISE patient reported outcome measurement instrument PROMISE SCALE (Patient-reported Outcome Scale in Acute pancreatitis) Each item is scored from 0 to 10 ( worst score in the last 24h): 0 none, 10: the highest possible intensity according to the patient
Pain, especially in the abdomen, chest or back
Abdominal distention (bloating, sensation of excess gas)
Difficulty eating, sensation of food being stuck in the stomach
Difficulty with bowel movements (constipation or straining on bowel movements)
Nausea and/or vomiting
Thirst
Weakness, lack of energy, fatigue, difficulty moving
From within 24h after admission to 15 days after discharge
Secondary EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30) Version 3.0 EORTC QLQ-C30, a widely used and validated quality of life scale, includes 28 questions with a four-point scale: "Not at all" (1 point), "A little" (2), "Quite a bit" (3) and "Very much." (4); 4 means an important impact on quality of life. The last 2 questions are scored from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent), being 7 indicative of excellent quality of life. 15 days after hospital discharge
Secondary C-reactive protein A marker of inflammation 48 and 72h after recruitment
Secondary Local complications (incidence of pancreatic/peripancreatic necrosis and acute peripancreatic fluid collections) Defined according to the revised Atlanta classification (Banks et al, Gut 2013) Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
Secondary Need for invasive treatment Endoscopic, percutaneous or surgical drainage or necrosectomy Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
Secondary Need for nutritional support Need for enteral and/or parenteral nutritional support Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
Secondary Admission in the Intensive Care Unit Need for intensive care support Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
Secondary Hospital stay Days, on index admission Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
Secondary Organ failure Transient and persistent organ failure defined according to the revised Atlanta classification (Banks et al, Gut 2013) Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
Secondary Mortality Mortality during index admission Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
Secondary Hospital readmission Hospital readmission due to symptom relapse or complications of index acute pancreatitis Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
Secondary Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) Presence of SIRS and persistent (>48h) SIRS Up to 15 days after hospital discharge from index hospital admission
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Enrolling by invitation NCT05410795 - Establishment and Verification of Pancreatic Volume Formula Based on Imaging
Recruiting NCT04195347 - Study of CM4620 to Reduce the Severity of Pancreatitis Due to Asparaginase Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT04735055 - Artificial Intelligence Prediction for the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis
Completed NCT02928718 - The Association Between Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis and Various Genetic Mutations
Terminated NCT02885441 - Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis With Ketorolac Phase 4
Completed NCT02563080 - Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency in Acute Pancreatitis
Recruiting NCT01626911 - Continuous Regional Arterial Infusion of Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Patients With Severe Acute Pancreatitis N/A
Completed NCT01507766 - The Correlations Between Early Enteral Nutrition and Intra-abdominal Pressure in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Phase 4
Completed NCT04901949 - The Course of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With Different BMI Groups
Recruiting NCT04814693 - Conventional Endoscopic Techniques Versus EndoRotor® System for Necrosectomy of Walled of Necrosis N/A
Completed NCT02743364 - Simvastatin in Reducing Pancreatitis in Patients With Recurrent, Acute or Chronic Pancreatitis Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05281458 - Early Versus Standard Endoscopic Interventions for Peripancreatic Fluid Collections N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04990336 - Dachaihu Decoction Compound and Rhubarb Single Medicine in the Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03259880 - Searching the Best Prognostic Factor in Out Come Evaluation in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis Admitted at Assiut University Hospitals N/A
Completed NCT02543658 - Neostigmine Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis Combined With Intra-abdominal Hypertension Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06023771 - Invasive Intervention of Local Complications of Acute Pancreatitis
Not yet recruiting NCT05501314 - Remote Home Monitoring Acute Pancreatitis N/A
Completed NCT02897206 - Imipenem Prophylaxis in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03634787 - Heat Shock Proteins: a Pathogenic Driver and Potential Therapeutic Target in Acute Pancreatitis
Active, not recruiting NCT04989166 - Effect of Nano-curcumin Supplementation in Acute Pancreatitis N/A