View clinical trials related to Acute Pain.
Filter by:In this study we evaluate if there is a correlation between acute pain and systemic inflammatory markers after total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).
The purpose of this study is to compare two opioid protocols ("H2O" and "1+1") for the treatment of acute severe pain in the emergency department. The investigators primary hypothesis is that the "H2O" protocol will be more efficacious than the "1+1" protocol in Emergency Department patients aged 21-64 years. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in each arm who choose to forgo additional pain medication at 60 minutes.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether sublingual buprenorphine is effective in the treatment of acute pain in adult patients with extremity bone fractures
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the use of ultrasound scanning of the thoracic spine to define the point of insertion and the depth of the epidural space compared to the blind technique. The study hypothesis is the use of Ultrasound will improve the success rate of epidural placement and may also decrease the rate of complications.
To evaluate efficacy and safety of additional dose of celecoxib, as compared to placebo, in patients with post lateral mandibular impacted third molar tooth extraction pain.
The primary aim of this study is to assess the impact of intrathecal morphine on post-operative pain following instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Secondary objectives of this study aim to assess side effects, overall narcotic use and duration of hospital stay following administration of intrathecal morphine. Based on our literature review, we expect a significant improvement in pain scores and functional status and minimal side effects with the use of intrathecal morphine. With improved pain and function we would also expect shorter hospital stays in those patients receiving intrathecal morphine.
The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate analgesic efficacy and safety of hydrocodone/acetaminophen extended release compared to placebo in moderate to severe pain following primary unilateral first metatarsal bunionectomy.
Research question: In adult emergency department (ED) patients to whom the attending ED physician has decided to administer intravenous opioid pain control: 1. What is the incidence of serious adverse events, defined as the use of naloxone, up to a total of 2 hours after infusion of 2 mg IV hydromorphone? 2. What is the incidence of other side effects (respiratory depression, hypotension, oxygen desaturation, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus) at 5, 15, 30 and 120 minutes post infusion of 2mg IV hydromorphone? 3. What is the speed of onset of 2 mg IV hydromorphone? This will be measured by asking the patient for his NRS pain score at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 minutes post infusion of 2 mg IV hydromorphone. 4. What is the incidence of administration of rescue medications? 5. For those patients who decline to enter the study, what are their reasons for refusal (e.g. fear of becoming addicted)? The investigators believe this is yet another barrier to providing adequate pain relief for patients with acute severe pain.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ADL5859 compared with placebo and an active control (ibuprofen) in subjects with acute dental pain after third molar extraction.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate analgesic efficacy and safety of hydrocodone/acetaminophen compared to placebo in moderate to severe pain following molar extraction.