View clinical trials related to Acute Kidney Injury.
Filter by:This is a Phase 1b, single center, dose-escalating study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic effect of RBT-3 in healthy volunteers and in subjects with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease.
The primary objectives of the BiPhox-Trial are to demonstrate, that the use of Biphozyl® as a replacement fluid in adult critically ill acute kidney injury (AKI) patients, results in a lower rate of pH excursions and of bicarbonate (HCO3-) excursions compared to the use of Phoxilium® during the studied continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) interval with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). The secondary objectives of the BiPhox-Trial are to evaluate the time to pH level normalization and the HCO3- substitution rates after initiation of CVVH treatment. Further, to demonstrate that the use of Biphozyl® as a replacement fluid in adult critically ill AKI patients, results in a more stable acid-base-status as well as improved respiratory situation due to lower intracorporeal HCO3- and carbon dioxide levels compared to the use of Phoxilium® during the studied CVVH interval with RCA.
The purpose of this study is to provide messages to providers if their patient is at high risk of developing intraoperative hypotension based on past medical history and co-morbidities preoperatively and minutes of hypotension intraoperatively.
The investigators designed a monitoring and control table of a citrate treatment on a specific monitor. This is the Baxter "Prismaflex" monitor, with 8.2 software version. Dialysis bath liquids marketed by Baxter: Biphozyl are used. Citrate liquid (1:18) Regiocit is used. The dialysis treatment monitor (CVVHD) is programmed, with a blood / citrate pumps at a rate of 1:10 (1 ml / min of blood: 10 ml / h of dialysis fluid) The starting dose of citrate will be 3.5 mmol / l and the calcium compensation will be 100% Working hypothesis: The patient undergoing citrate anticoagulation according to the designed algorithm will respond with ion stability and pH during the treatment, in addition to achieving an effective cleaning process.
Background During anaesthesia for repair of a broken hip, many patients experience low blood pressure. There have been many studies showing that patients who experience low blood pressure during anaesthesia are at increased risk of sustaining kidney or heart damage, strokes, having a post-operative infection, or dying. During anaesthesia, in most cases blood pressure is monitored using a cuff which inflates on the arm (the 'normal' way blood pressure is measured in a GP practice or hospital ward). This gives a reading each time the cuff goes up and down, every 3-5 minutes typically. There is a less well used way to measure blood pressure, using an additional cuff on the finger which gives a constant, continuous measure of blood pressure. We think that using this monitor, rather than the 'standard' monitor, will mean that low blood pressure is recognised more quickly, therefore treated more quickly, and will lead to patients having less exposure to dangerously low blood pressures. If this is the case, we hope that it will reduce how often patients experience kidney or heart damage, have an infection after surgery, suffer a stroke, and reduce the risk of death. Methodology To test this, we would need to run a large clinical trial comparing the continuous monitor to the standard monitor. This would be expensive and involve a great deal of work in a large number of hospitals, and so first we wish to determine whether the trial we would like to run is practical, and possible to deliver in the real world. To do this we plan to run the trial first on a small-scale feasibility (pilot) study, where we will recruit 30 patients, half of whom will have the standard monitor, and half of whom will have the continuous monitor. We will see what proportion of the patients who could enter the trial actually do so and complete it, and use it as an opportunity to iron out problems with the trial. If we find it is possible to run the trial on a small scale, we will apply for funding to run a full study. This will aim to answer the question of whether the continuous monitor improves the patient outcomes which were agreed during development with the patient public involvement group locally; rate of kidney damage, heart damage, stroke, post-operative infections, risk of death, and hospital length-of-stay. Expected outcomes and implications. We anticipate we will find the trial to be feasible with amendments to the way it is run, and if this is the case, we will apply to run the full scale trial. If this shows that using the continuous monitor improves the patient outcomes above, then it would represent new, significant evidence that may lead to the NHS adopting it's use as 'standard care' during anaesthesia for repair of a broken hip, and would like lead to similar trials in other operations where patients may benefit in a similar way.
Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a disease in which patients with cirrhosis (end stage liver failure) develop secondary kidney injury and failure. The current treatment available in the United States is a combination of octreotide and midodrine, which are meant to decrease the release of those hormones and raise the blood pressure, respectively, which would increase blood flow to the kidneys. Angiotensin 2 (Ang2) is a new vasopressor drug that was approved by the FDA in December 2017 for patients with low blood pressure and has been shown to have similar effects to octreotide and midodrine. This study will investigate whether Ang2 reverses HRS among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Ronald Reagan Medical Center. Our study population will be patients with HRS who are already or will be admitted to the ICU. HRS will be defined by new internationally accepted guidelines published by the International Club of Ascites. All patients who are consented will undergo an Ang2 response trial, where low-dose Ang2 will be administered for 4 hours to see how the patients respond. This will help us characterize the nature of the patients' kidney failure for later analysis. Patients will then be randomized into the control group or the study group. Patients in the control group will receive octreotide (a subcutaneous injection) and midodrine (an oral drug). Patients in the study group will continue receiving intravenous infusion of Ang2. Patients in both groups will also receive albumin, a protein found commonly in human blood. Treatment will continue in both groups for four days, until complete reversal of HRS, dialysis, or death. Our primary outcome will be rate of reversal of HRS, defined as improvement in kidney function.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in critically ill patients. Based on the sensitive KDIGO criteria, the incidence of AKI on ICU varies between 30-60 %. These large variations of incidence of AKI are due to different baseline characteristics of studied patients, the length of observation period, use of creatinine criteria only or use of creatinine and urine output criteria. Furthermore, back estimation of baseline creatinine instead of measured creatinine in patients with missing laboratory values may lead to overestimation of AKI severity and outcomes. Major surgery, trauma, infection, sepsis or a complication of severe illness can lead to an abrupt decrease in glomerular filtration in critically ill patients. Such episode of AKI is associated with short term adverse effects such as fluid overload, electrolyte imbalance, acid-base derangements, immune dysfunction, coagulation abnormalities and alterations in mental status. Additionally, AKI in critically ill patients leads to prolonged ICU length of stay, increase in morbidity and mortality as well as higher costs. Multiple large studies found, after correction for potential confounders, that AKI was independently associated with worse outcomes. Moderate and severe AKI stages were associated with 2.9 - 6.9 fold increased in-hospital mortality (3). Increasing AKI severity in ICU patients was not only associated with increased mortality, AKI patients had also worse renal function at the time of hospital discharge. The individual condition leading to AKI in combination with increased susceptibility to AKI may significantly influence outcome. Indeed, current data from many studies show that mortality from AKI differs in various clinical settings. However, there are not enough data on different types of surgery and their effect on AKI yet. The aim of our epidemiological study is to investigate the occurrence and outcomes of AKI in different types of surgery in postoperative ICU patients at the Vienna General Hospital.
This is a randomized clinical trial of a "Kidney Action Team", which will provide timely, personalized recommendations for the diagnosis and initial treatment of hospitalized patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI).
The use of extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT) is becoming increasingly widespread worldwide in everyday clinical practice, particularly in the critical care setting. Nonetheless, most of the clinical trials aimed at exploring the effect of EBPT on patients' long-term outcomes have failed to demonstrate consistent results regarding 28 day- or hospital- mortality rates. The aim of this observational prospective registry is to evaluate if there is a cluster of critically ill patients that mostly benefits from extracorporeal blood purification therapies with different EBPTs.
- Study: Open label, non-randomized, observational, descriptive and prospective pharmacokinetic. - Patients: sepsis patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and admitted at the Intensive care unit of Bellvitge University Hospitals. No power calculations needed. - Antibiotic treatment: piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane and daptomycin as their standard of care and doses will be at the discretion of the treating physician. - CRRT treatment: continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) will be performed by using the PrismafleX eXeed™ system with a high adsorbent membrane (oXiris®). - Antibiotic concentrations: blood pre and post filter, urine and ultrafiltrate samples will be collected at steady state conditions. Samplig time will depend on dosage regimens of each antibiotic.