Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04686292
Other study ID # SHS-ED-12b-2020
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date March 1, 2021
Est. completion date June 1, 2022

Study information

Verified date September 2022
Source University of Southern Denmark
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

A more rapid test for bacteriuria is desired. This will exclude the patients not having bacteriuria, which will contribute to a more rapid and accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases. The aim of the study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care urine flow cytometry on diagnosing and excluding bacteriuria


Description:

A prerequisite for the appropriate use of antibiotics is timely access to accurate diagnostic tests, since treatment of acute infections should be initiated within a few hours to avoid serious complications such as bacteremia, sepsis, organ failure, septic shock and death. The diagnosis of urinary tract infections including acute pyelonephritis (APN) is difficult due to often weak and non-specific symptoms and high incidence of asymptomatic bacteruria in especially elderly patients. The diagnosis is verified by significant bacteriuria in urine culture. Unfortunately, the time from urine sample to result from urine cultures is more than 24 hours days. Urine test strips are unreliable with low specificity and low predictive values. Therefore, a point-of-care (POC) test is desired, which can provide rapid results and quickly identify a bacteriuria. One such tool may be urine flow cytometry (UFC), which has shown promising diagnostic value for the exclusion of bacteriuria with a high negative predictive value. However, better documentation for its use as an ED diagnostic screening method is needed. The aim of the study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of POC-UFC on diagnosing and excluding bacteriuria? Our hypothesis is that by excluding patients not having bacteriuria, it will contribute to a more rapid and accurate diagnosis


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 966
Est. completion date June 1, 2022
Est. primary completion date February 28, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Suspicion of acute infections assessed by the receiving physician at the emergency department Exclusion Criteria: - If the attending physician considers that participation will delay a life-saving treatment or patient needs direct transfer to the intensive care unit. - Admission within the last 14 days - Verified COVID-19 disease within 14 days before admission - Pregnant women - Severe immunodeficiencies: Primary immunodeficiencies and secondary immunodeficiencies (HIV positive CD4 <200, Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment (ATC L04A), Corticosteroid treatment (>20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for >14 days within the last 30 days), Chemotherapy within 30 days)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
urine flow cytometry
Diagnostic test of urine flow cytometry. A urine sample will be collected according to routine procedure by a study assistant. The sample will be divided into two aliquots; half for routine urine culturing, and half for Point-of-care Urine Flow cytometry (POC-UFC) analysis (UF-5000, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). The analysis will be performed according to manufacturer's instruction and conducted by laboratory staff. Laboratory staff will be blinded to the participants diagnosis and outcome. The results of the POC-UFC analysis will not be visible to the treating physician.

Locations

Country Name City State
Denmark Hospital of Southern Jutland Aabenraa

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Southern Denmark

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

References & Publications (2)

Herráez O, Asencio MA, Carranza R, Jarabo MM, Huertas M, Redondo O, Arias-Arias A, Jiménez-Álvarez S, Solís S, Zamarrón P, Illescas MS, Galán MA. Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer to screen urinary tract infections: the URISCAM multicentre study. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018 Mar;66(3):175-181. doi: 10.1111/lam.12832. Epub 2018 Jan 28. — View Citation

Köves B, Cai T, Veeratterapillay R, Pickard R, Seisen T, Lam TB, Yuan CY, Bruyere F, Wagenlehner F, Bartoletti R, Geerlings SE, Pilatz A, Pradere B, Hofmann F, Bonkat G, Wullt B. Benefits and Harms of Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the European Association of Urology Urological Infection Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):865-868. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 25. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Intensive care unit treatment transfer to ICU during current admission (binary outcome) within 60 days from admission to emergency department
Other Length of stay days spent in hospital during current admission within 60 days from admission to emergency department
Other The number of participants who died within 30 days binary - 30-days mortality within 30 days from arrival day
Other The number of participants who died within 90 days binary - 90 days mortality within 90 days from arrival day
Other Readmission binary within 30 days from day of discharge
Other In-hospital mortality binary within 60 days from admission to emergency department
Other Level of infection markers Concentration of serum procalcitonin, CRP and suPAR blood collected within 4 hours of arrival to emergency department
Other Urological intervention Number of patients, who during the course of admission with suspected acute pyelonephritis requires urological interventions Measured 7 days after admission
Primary Bacteriuria The urine culture analysis combined with microbiologist assessment will be used as reference standard for bacteriuria. Diagnostic accuracy will be conducted, and Youden index analysis will be used to estimate the best cut-off urine collected within 4 hours of arrival to emergency department and analysed within one week
Secondary Verified infectious diagnosis by expert panel An expert panel will define the final diagnosis (including APN) based on all findings during admission. The expert panel consists of two independent consultants from the emergency department with significant experience in emergency medicine and acute infections. They will individually determine the type of infection the patient admitted actually had. The final diagnosis will be based on all available relevant information from the patient medical record including MRI of kidneys and HR-CT of lungs. A standardized template will be used. Disagreement will be discussed until a consensus is reached. 2 months after discharge
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04690569 - Establish MeMed BV™ Performance for Differentiating Bacterial From Viral Infection in Suspected Acute Infection Patients (APOLLO STUDY)
Completed NCT04182906 - Pediatric ACEs Screening and Resiliency Study N/A
Completed NCT05439551 - Evaluating the Analytical Equivalency of Serum and Whole Blood Samples Run on the MeMed Key® Platform (Perseverance Study)
Completed NCT03494790 - Markers of Inflammation and Metabolism in the ER
Completed NCT05293977 - Short-Term Use of Antibiotics and Adherence Level N/A
Recruiting NCT05758246 - Senolytics To slOw Progression of Sepsis (STOP-Sepsis) Trial Phase 2
Completed NCT06040684 - Development of Antibodies Against Transplant Kidney After Infection