Prehospital Translation of Chest Pain Tools

Acute Coronary Syndrome Clinical Trial

— RESCUE  

Official title:

Translating Evidence-Based Chest Pain Decision Aids to the Prehospital Environment

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03494556
• Other study ID #: IRB00048904
• Status: Completed
• Start date: April 18, 2018
• Est. completion date: September 9, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: October 2019
• Source: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

Decision aids such as the HEART Pathway, Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS), Revised Geneva Score and PERC Score have similar ability to accurately risk stratify Emergency Department (ED) patients with possible Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE) and have become standard practice in the ED setting. This study seeks to determine whether prehospital use of these decision aids is feasible and determine which are the most sensitive and specific for prediction of ACS and PE, respectively.

Description:

To accomplish our Specific Aims the study team proposes a prospective, observational pilot study of four rapid risk stratification tools, the HEART Pathway Score, EDACS score, revised Geneva score, and PERC score, among 250 chest pain patients within two large EMS systems. The proposed pilot study has broad-based support from local and state EMS agencies, including Cumberland and New Hanover County EMS agencies. Each tool will be pilot tested and compared in the prehospital setting for feasibility and accuracy. Paramedics will be trained in risk stratification tool use and then will prospectively collect the clinical data needed to calculate each risk stratification score when caring for adults with chest pain. Completed paramedic risk assessments will be used to determine feasibility. Patients will be followed for 30 days to determine occurrence of ACS and PE events and the sensitivity of each risk stratification decision aid will be determined.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 365
• Est. completion date: September 9, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: February 18, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 21 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age greater than or equal to 21

• Acute non-traumatic chest pain

• Transported by Cumberland or New Hanover County EMS to a local Emergency Department

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with evidence of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on ECG

• Inter-facility transports (transfers)

• Patients with unstable vital signs

• Prisoners

• Non-english speakers

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acute Coronary Syndrome
• Chest Pain
• Embolism
• Pulmonary Embolism

Intervention

Other:
• Data Collection
Paramedic will use data collected during routine care to complete four risk stratification tools.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Cape Fear Valley Mobile Integrated Healthcare Cumberland County EMS	Fayetteville	North Carolina
United States	New Hanover Regional Medical Center EMS	Wilmington	North Carolina

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences	Cape Fear Valley Mobile Integrated Healthcare Cumberland County EMS, New Hanover Regional Medical Center EMS

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (16)

Burman RA, Zakariassen E, Hunskaar S. Acute chest pain - a prospective population based study of contacts to Norwegian emergency medical communication centres. BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Jul 21;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-9. — View Citation

Flaws D, Than M, Scheuermeyer FX, Christenson J, Boychuk B, Greenslade JH, Aldous S, Hammett CJ, Parsonage WA, Deely JM, Pickering JW, Cullen L. External validation of the emergency department assessment of chest pain score accelerated diagnostic pathway (EDACS-ADP). Emerg Med J. 2016 Sep;33(9):618-25. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205028. Epub 2016 Jul 12. — View Citation

Havas S. The ACCORD Trial and control of blood glucose level in type 2 diabetes mellitus: time to challenge conventional wisdom. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 26;169(2):150-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.518. No abstract available. — View Citation

Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, Richman PB, Courtney DM. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Aug;2(8):1247-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00790.x. — View Citation

Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Aujesky D, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 7;144(3):165-71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00004. — View Citation

Lowthian JA, Cameron PA, Stoelwinder JU, Curtis A, Currell A, Cooke MW, McNeil JJ. Increasing utilisation of emergency ambulances. Aust Health Rev. 2011 Feb;35(1):63-9. doi: 10.1071/AH09866. — View Citation

Mahler SA, Hiestand BC, Goff DC Jr, Hoekstra JW, Miller CD. Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events? Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011 Sep;10(3):128-33. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3182315a85. — View Citation

Mahler SA, Miller CD, Hollander JE, Nagurney JT, Birkhahn R, Singer AJ, Shapiro NI, Glynn T, Nowak R, Safdar B, Peberdy M, Counselman FL, Chandra A, Kosowsky J, Neuenschwander J, Schrock JW, Plantholt S, Diercks DB, Peacock WF. Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):795-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Oct 30. — View Citation

Mahler SA, Riley RF, Hiestand BC, Russell GB, Hoekstra JW, Lefebvre CW, Nicks BA, Cline DM, Askew KL, Elliott SB, Herrington DM, Burke GL, Miller CD. The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):195-203. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001384. Epub 2015 Mar 3. — View Citation

Owens PL, Barrett ML, Gibson TB, Andrews RM, Weinick RM, Mutter RL. Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Aug;56(2):150-65. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 Jan 15. — View Citation

Pittet V, Burnand B, Yersin B, Carron PN. Trends of pre-hospital emergency medical services activity over 10 years: a population-based registry analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 10;14:380. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-380. — View Citation

Pollack CV, Schreiber D, Goldhaber SZ, Slattery D, Fanikos J, O'Neil BJ, Thompson JR, Hiestand B, Briese BA, Pendleton RC, Miller CD, Kline JA. Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 8;57(6):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.071. — View Citation

Saddichha S, Saxena MK. Is every chest pain a cardiac event? : an audit of patients with chest pain presenting to emergency services in India. Intern Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;4(3):235-9. doi: 10.1007/s11739-009-0246-3. Epub 2009 Apr 15. — View Citation

Than M, Flaws D, Sanders S, Doust J, Glasziou P, Kline J, Aldous S, Troughton R, Reid C, Parsonage WA, Frampton C, Greenslade JH, Deely JM, Hess E, Sadiq AB, Singleton R, Shopland R, Vercoe L, Woolhouse-Williams M, Ardagh M, Bossuyt P, Bannister L, Cullen L. Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol. Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Feb;26(1):34-44. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12164. Epub 2014 Jan 15. — View Citation

Thang ND, Sundstrom BW, Karlsson T, Herlitz J, Karlson BW. ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia in the prehospital setting of a suspected acute coronary syndrome and its association with outcomes. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;32(6):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 15. — View Citation

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; Katus HA, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012 Oct 16;126(16):2020-35. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available. — View Citation

* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Determine whether prehospital chest pain decision aid use is feasible.	Paramedics and blinded Emergency Department providers will be complete four risk stratification tools on a convenience sample of patients with acute chest pain. Inter-rater reliability (kappa) will be determined for each tool.	24 hours
Secondary	Compare decision aids to determine which are the most sensitive and specific	Destination hospitals have well established linkages between the prehospital and hospital Electronic Medical Record (EMR) facilitating patient outcome ascertainment. Data will be abstracted from the EMR to determine occurrence of 30 day study outcomes.	30 days