Antithrombotic Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with ticagrelor (plus aspirin and bivalirudin) is more effective than treatment with clopidogrel (plus aspirin and bivalirudin).

Clinical Trial Description

The HORIZONS-AMI Trial compared the effectiveness of heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) versus bivalirudin in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients undergoing stent deployment 1. Overall the data showed benefits associated with the bivalirudin treatment with lower rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, re-infarction and non-CABG related major bleeding; However, the data seems to indicate a non-significant increase in acute stent thrombosis in the bivalirudin group. This observation seems to suggest the potential benefits of adding an antiplatelet agent to bivalirudin. A study by Dangas G et al found that in the HORIZONS-AMI patients, the group receiving 600 mg loading-dose of clopidogrel had significantly lower 30-day unadjusted rates of mortality, reinfarction and stent thrombosis than the 300 mg loading-dose group, without increase in bleeding rate. Furthermore, even though the benefits of bivalirudin were independent of the clopidogrel loading dose; the 600mg LD was associated with more benefits with both anticoagulation regimens. Similar observations have been reported in the ARMYDA-6 MI study.

It is our hypothesis that using ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel, given its more potent and faster activity, would have greater antithrombotic activity and therefore may reduce the rate of acute stent thrombosis when administered in combination with bivalirudin + ASA in AMI patients. To investigate this hypothesis, we will compare the antithrombotic effects of ticagrelor with clopidogrel, when administered in combination with ASA and bivalirudin, in healthy human volunteers using a cross-over study design. The antithrombotic activity will be assessed pre-treatment and 2-hours and 24-hours post treatment, using methodologies including Badimon Perfusion chamber, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, platelet aggregation with Multiplate Analyzer and Thromboelastography. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Pharmacodynamics Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01642238
Study type	Interventional
Source	Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Phase 4
Start date	July 2012
Completion date	April 2013

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT05846893` - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06013813` - Conventional vs. Distal Radial Access Outcomes in STEMI Patients Treated by PCI	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05412927` - AngelMed Guardian® System PMA Post Approval Study
Completed	`NCT02750579` - Early or Delayed Revascularization for Intermediate and High-risk Non ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes?	N/A
Completed	`NCT04102410` - Assessing Force-velocity Profile: an Innovative Approach to Optimize Cardiac Rehabilitation in Coronary Patients	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT03342131` - Serum Concentration of Wnt2 and Wnt4 in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01218776` - International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Transitional Countries
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT04676100` - International CR Registry
Completed	`NCT03590535` - 5th Generation cTnT in ED ACS
Recruiting	`NCT05437900` - INSIGHTFUL-FFR Clinical Trial	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT05551429` - Factors Related to Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Terminated	`NCT04316481` - IDE-ALERTS Continued Access Study	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04475380` - Complex All-comers and Patients With Diabetes or Prediabetes, Treated With Xience Sierra Everolimus-eluting Stents
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04852146` - Electronic Feedback for Data Restitution and Valorization to the Emergency Teams in Aquitaine.
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02892903` - In the Management of Coronary Artery Disease, Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment at the Time of Coronary Angiography Affect Management Strategy, Hospital Costs and Outcomes?	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT02871622` - BMX Alpha Registry: a Post-market Registry of the BioMatrix Alpha TM	N/A
Completed	`NCT02944123` - Half Dose of Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome (HOPE-TAILOR)	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT04077229` - Piloting Text Messages to Promote Positive Affect and Physical Activity	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02922140` - The Impact of Pharmaceutical Care Practice on Patients in Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit	N/A
Completed	`NCT02673437` - Rivaroxaban ACS Specialist Cohort Event Monitoring Study

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.