View clinical trials related to Achalasia.
Filter by:Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy has been established as a safe and effective treatment of Achalasia type I and II; however, it is limited by post-procedure gastroesophageal reflux. Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) has been introduced as the endoscopic gold standard for anti-reflux procedure. Recently, combined POEM-TIF has been performed successfully as a standard of care treatment for patients with severe GER after POEM. We aim to study the safety and feasibility of performing POEM-TIF (POEM and TIF in the same endoscopic session). This study will also put the groundwork for a randomized clinical trial to further study the clinical outcome of the POEM-TIF procedure.
Researchers are reviewing and analyzing surgical and clinical outcomes of subjects who underwent POPE for end-stage achalasia, a sigmoid esophagus, or a redundant conduit that has been used to replace the esophagus. This data will help researchers determine the safety and efficacy of a novel minimally invasive treatment compared to invasive surgery.
POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) is an endoscopic procedure most commonly used to treat achalasia. Achalasia is a disorder resulting from the inability of esophageal muscles to relax.The POEM procedure, performed under general anesthesia, involves inserting an endoscope into the esophagus where a specialized knife is able to cut a new pathway through the esophageal tissue. The knife is then used to incise, and therefore loosen, tight muscles within the esophagus, lower esophageal sphincter, and the upper region of the stomach that are responsible for the symptoms.This study seeks to improve patient's post-operative pain levels by placing ropivacaine (a local anesthetic) into the newly cut pathway that is created in the POEM procedure. It is hypothesized that the topical irrigation of the POEM tunnel with ropivacaine will result in decreased pain scores and a decreased need for additional pain medications.
Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder. Treatment of achalasia is aimed toward palliation of symptoms. These include botox injections to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), pneumatic dilation, surgical myotomy, and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Botox injections are frequently used for patients that have significant comorbidities. The primary aim of this study is to assess symptomatic response of patient with achalasia to esophageal dilation and botox injection to the LES compared to standard therapy of only botox injection.
Background: Achalasia is a primary rare esophageal motor disorder of the esophagus (annual incidence of 1:100,000 persons). Recently, a new endoscopic technique, Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), has been introduced with excellent success rates. Several studies have evaluated complications of POEM but there is a lack of knowledge on the potential risk of bacteremia or microbial translocation during the endoscopic intervention and, also, there aren't evidences regarding the use of antibiotics before/after POEM. Microbial translocation (MT) is the passage of both viable and nonviable microbes across the anatomically intact GI barrier to the mesenteric lymph nodes, and possibly other tissues. Gram-negative bacteria contain lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) coating their thin peptidoglycan cell wall. The presence of LPS, an endotoxin, in the plasma has been correlated to sepsis and septic shock through the activation of the inflammatory host defence via binding to soluble CD14 (sCD14) which initiates downstream cytokines (like IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α)) and, also, through the production of sCD14 and LPS-binding protein (LBP) by the innate immune system. Objectives: Considering POEM a clean-contaminated procedure, it should be assessed whether the post-POEM fever or systemic inflammation is a cytokinin-mediated or an infection-related fever. Thus, aim of the study is to evaluate the presence of inflammation mediators, bacteremia and microbial translocation post POEM, to guide future antibiotic prophylaxis/therapy in patients undergoing this procedure. Methods: All patients who will undergo POEM at _Investigator's Department from June 2017 to June 2019 will be enrolled in a prospective, interventional randomized clinical trial (RCT). Patients will be randomized in two groups. The Group A, prophylaxis group, will receive antibiotics (Cefazolin 2 gr i.v.) only before procedure whereas Group B, short therapy group, will receive antibiotics before POEM (Cefazolin 2 gr i.v.), continued for the first 24 hours and then per os (Amoxicilline/Clavulanic Acid 3 gr/die) for 3 days. For each patient we will be evaluated: dosage of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, sCD4, LPB, LPS and blood cultures. Expected results: we expect that the prophylaxis group vs short therapy group, has a prevalence of fever and/or systemic inflammation not higher than 10% difference of the fever related to the procedure.
Esophageal achalasia is a precancerous condition for epidermoid carcinoma; incidence and risk factors for cancer development are not defined. Incidence and risk factors for epidermoid carcinoma development in achalasia patients were investigated.
Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is increasingly used for the treatment of achalasia. In published series, a 12cm-POEM is usually performed. Surgical myotomy is typically shorter (8cm). The clinical efficacy of both procedure is comparable. This study intends to investigate if clinical outcomes of POEM depends on the length of esophageal myotomy, in patients with classic-type achalasia (type I and type II according to Chicago Classification)
This study evaluates whether a medication called mirabegron is better than placebo (sugar pill) in helping patients with achalasia swallow better. Each patient will receive either mirabegron or the placebo for 4 weeks followed by the opposite medication. Each patient will complete several surveys and undergo several tests to determine if the mirabegron is helping reduce the pressures in the esophagus (swallowing tube).
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the anterior versus posterior myotomy technique in Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of Achalasia. The primary efficacy outcome is periprocedural pain requiring the use of narcotics. The secondary outcomes focus on safety which includes technical procedure duration time; tunneling time, myotomy time, and closure time; incidence of mucosotomy (transmural and non-transmural injury), capnoperitoneum, and the postoperative sequelae of gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD). Periprocedural pain data collection will include post POEM procedure pain scores, administrations of analgesia until discharge. The final analysis will focus on determining whether there is a statistically significant difference in the amount and severity of pain in the Anterior versus Posterior myotomy subject populations. Additional analysis will be the collection of analgesic type (narcotic versus non-narcotic), dosage, frequency, and duration of treatment from post POEM procedure in the endoscopy recovery suite until the subjects are discharged.
Evaluation of current and newly developed endoluminal therapies in the management of Upper and Lower GI conditions.