Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06158464
Other study ID # FCE-study
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 14, 2023
Est. completion date August 31, 2024

Study information

Verified date January 2024
Source KU Leuven
Contact Jonas S Steel, PhD
Phone +3216373079
Email jonas.steel@kuleuven.be
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate Functional Capacity Evaluations in persons on sick leave or work disability. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the impact of FCE on the person on sick leave/work disability (quantitative) - What is the impact of FCE on the decision-making process by the medical advisor? (qualitative) - What is the usability, feasibility and quality of FCE for the medical advisor, occupational therapist, mediators of the regional services, and return-to-work coordinators? (qualitative) This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants in the control group will receive care-as-usual by the medical advisor. Participants in the intervention group will receive an FCE on top of care-as-usual. This is performed by an occupational therapist in their region, and a report of the FCE is delivered to the medical advisor. Both groups are asked to complete questionnaires at baseline, and after 3,6, and 9 months. Researchers will compare questionnaire results from participants in the control and intervention group, to see if their workability (primary outcome), steps to return to work, expectations to return to work, return to work beliefs, time until (partial) reintegration, self-efficacy in return to work, pain scale, and illness perception (secondary outcomes) are affected differently.


Description:

This research project on the use of Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCE) within the context of benefit insurance in Belgium falls under the joint control of the National Institute for Sickness and Disability Insurance (RIZIV), the Haute École de Leonard Vinci and KU Leuven . KU Leuven hereby acts as the study's principal, but together with RIZIV and Haute École determines the objectives of the study as joint controllers. An FCE consists of the evaluation of functional capacities based on medical reporting, observations and/or a series of standardised tests performed by an occupational therapist. This evaluation can give socially insured persons and medical advisors of the mutualities more insight into the participation possibilities of the socially insured person in function of the previous or next job. To date, the advisory doctor does not yet have the opportunity to have these evaluations carried out in Belgium. The aim of this study is therefore to examine the impact of these FCEs with regard to people on incapacity for work who meet the following conditions: 1. Belgian citizens on sick leave or work disability who meet the criteria determined by the article 100§1 and 100 §2 of the coordinated law of 14 July 1994, or by article 19 and/or 20 of the RD 20 July 1971. 2. The person's medical situation is stabilised (no significant evolution due to illness, procedure, treatment) 3. It is not a purely mental/psychiatric disorder 4. From the point of view of the consulting physician, there is a lack of consistent information on the capacity to return to work 5. Inclusion takes place from the 6th month of incapacity 6. The person is of working age: 18-65 years In this RCT, 10 consulting physicians, 30 occupational therapists, and 200 persons on incapacity will be recruited. Then, persons on sick leave/work disability are randomly divided into two groups: 1) Persons in the control group receive the usual counselling by the medical advisor. 2) Persons in the intervention group receive usual care and an FCE. In the latter group, the person on sick leave is matched by the researchers to an occupational therapist in his region, and is invited to a FCE. After the evaluation, the person reviews the results with the occupational therapist, and a report of the FCE is provided to the medical advisor. Finally, the person is contacted by the medical advisor if they wish to take certain actions as a result of the FCE report. To measure the impact of the FCE, the intervention and control groups thereby complete a questionnaire at four points in time: at baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months, and after 9 months. This questionnaire is composed of validated instruments, and in addition to background characteristics, it questions work ability, self-efficacy, expectations of returning to work, any (steps taken to) return to work, pain intensity, illness perception, and beliefs regarding returning to work. As a second objective, the impact on the medical advisors' (and other parties') decision-making process will be investigated through qualitative interviews and focus groups. To this end, a process evaluation will be conducted. This includes an examination of the implementation of the study, the usability, feasibility and quality of FCEs and their reporting, and the underlying causal mechanisms of the intervention. Using interviews and focus groups with medical advisors the impact of the FCE on the decision-making process will be investigated. Using interviews with occupational therapists, return-to-work coordinators and mediators of the regional services the usability, feasibility and quality of the FCE will be investigated.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date August 31, 2024
Est. primary completion date August 31, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - persons on sick leave or work disability (according to Belgian law) - The person on sick leave/work disability is affected by an illness/injury that is considered stabilized (no significant medical evolution of the disease, nor a medical procedure or acute treatment is expected). - The illness/injury of the person on sick leave/work disability is not mainly a mental/psychiatric disorder. - From the point of view of the medical advisor, there is a lack of consistent information on the person on sick leave/work disability's capacity to return-to-work. - Inclusion takes place from the 6th month of incapacity for work. - The person on sick leave/work disability is of working age (18-65). Exclusion Criteria: - In the case of an accident at workplace, the medical condition of the person on sick leave/work disability has not yet been declared consolidated, meaning that the condition does not progress significantly, either naturally or with treatment. - The medical advisor of the mutual health insurance is expecting in the near future: 1) a spontaneous return to work (total or partial), 2) a registration as a job-seeker, or 3) an end of the recognition of the work disability. - The person on sick leave/work disability is pregnant. - The medical advisor of the mutual health insurance perceives the person on sick leave/work disability does not have sufficient work capacity.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Functional Capacity Evaluation
In a FCE, an occupational therapist will evaluate a patient's ability to perform work-related tasks, using a battery of tests. Depending on the circumstances, he/she will for instance test fatigue, ask the patient to kneel, lift objects, or assess concentration. This assessment lasts ± 4 hours and includes physical tests and tests related to the (previous or reference) profession of the client. This means that an explicit match is made between the functional capacities of the patient (what is he/she capable of) and the demands of a certain job (what is he/she expected to do). Following this assessment, the occupational therapist will explain the results of this assessment to the patient. The evaluation will therefore take place during one or two visits.

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium MC Hainaut Anderlues
Belgium LM Plus Antwerpen Antwerp
Belgium Helan/Medisch kabinet Genk Genk
Belgium CM Gent Gent
Belgium CM Vlaams-Brabant Leuven
Belgium MC Liège Liège
Belgium CM Oostende Oostende
Belgium Mutsoc Luxembourg Saint-Hubert

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
KU Leuven Haute École Léonard de Vinci, National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI), Belgium

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Workability The single-item first WAI (Work Ability Index) question is a self-report question in which the person rates his "current work ability compared with the lifetime best", with a score of 0 ("completely unable to work") up to 10 ("work ability at its lifetime best"). measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary Self-efficacy in the context of return-to-work The self-efficacy return to work scale is a 10 item self-report questionnaire consisting of three subdomains of self-efficacy: (1) ability to cope with pain, (2) ability to obtain help from supervisor, and (3) ability to obtain help from co-workers. (Brouwer et al., 2009, 2010). There are five response options; for each item the person is asked to rate his/her confidence on a five-point scale (0 = not at all certain, 4 = completely certain). Subscores and an overall score (i.e., summative score) can be obtained, with higher scores indicating better return-to-work self-efficacy. measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary Expectations to return-to-work A single-item question "To what extent do you think you will return to work?" with the 4 response options: 1 (to a low degree); 2 (to a certain degree); 3 (to a high degree); 4 (do not know) measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary Steps to return-to-work The participants indicate which steps they have undertaken in their return-to-work, multiple answers are possible. Answers range from following training programmes, looking for jobs, undergoing work-oriented rehabilitation, to returning to work at a new or former employee. measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary Pain scale The Graded Chronic Pain Scale Revised (GCPS-R) is a 5-item self-report questionnaire assessing (1) current pain, (2) limitations in life or work abilities, (3) general pain, (4) enjoyment of life, (5) interference with general activity. For items 1 and 2, responses options are Never/Some days/Most days/Everyday, for items 3 responses options are the following: from 0 (No pain) to 10 (Pain as bad as you can imagine) while for items 4 and 5 responses options are the following : from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary Illness perception The Brief IPQ has nine items, it is designed to measure patients' cognitive and emotional representations of their illness including consequences (item 1), timeline (item 2), personal control (item 3), treatment control (item 4), identity (item 5), coherence (item 6), concern (item 7), emotional response (item 8), and causes (item 9) (Broadbent et al., 2006). All of the items except the causal question are rated using a 0-to 10 response scale. Increases in item scores represent linear increases in the dimension measured. measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary Return-to-work beliefs The RTW Beliefs questionnaire is composed of 12 items divided into four subscale of general direct measures: intention (i.e., "I expect to/want to/intend to …"), attitude (i.e., "RTW is for me: harmful-beneficial/ good-bad/pleasant-unpleasant/worthless-useful"), subjective norms (i.e., "It is expected of me that I should … /I feel under social pressure to … /People who are important to me want me to …" ) , and perceived behavioural control (i.e., "I'm confident that I could … / for me RTW is (easy-difficult). measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05006976 - A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06025604 - ACTIVPROSEIN : Professional Activity After Breast Cancer
Recruiting NCT06028048 - Enhancing Work Participation of Unemployed and Work-Disabled Cancer Survivors Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03666936 - Facilitate the Return to Work of Cancer Survivors N/A
Completed NCT04934735 - Case-management Rehabilitation Intervention in Facilitating Return to Work After Myocardial Infarction N/A
Completed NCT03010384 - Contact to a Physician Specialized in Social Medicine and Return to Work N/A
Recruiting NCT05310695 - A Naturalistic Trial of the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Efficacy Study N/A
Recruiting NCT04665180 - Determinants for Return to Work After Primary Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT06418828 - Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection Returning to Work After Discharge:a Cross-sectional Survey
Completed NCT03294109 - Evaluation of Abdominal Wall Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Post-Operative Analgesia in Donor Nephrectomy Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT01801969 - Return to Work and QOL Following TBI. Impact of Rehabilitation Service. N/A
Recruiting NCT05173740 - Rehabilitation for Survivors of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Phase 4
Completed NCT03848468 - Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids. N/A