Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02908256
Other study ID # CHUB-GIFA
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received September 16, 2016
Last updated January 18, 2018
Start date April 2011
Est. completion date March 2016

Study information

Verified date January 2018
Source Brugmann University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

An optimal intraoperative fluid replacement reduces the hospital stay, the admissions in the intensive care unit and the mortality rate after a major surgery.

Different criteria are used to guide the optimal vascular filling of a patient. Among the various monitoring for the last twenty years are parameters originating from the respiratory variations of the arterial pressure curves and the pulse oximetry.

On arterial curves, the Systolic Pressure Variation (SPV) is the difference between the maximum systolic pressure (DeltaUp) and the minimal one (DeltaDown).On the oxygen saturometry curves obtained with the Masimo Radical7, the plethysmographic variability index (PVI) corresponds to the formula (PImax-PImin/PImax X 100%) where PI corresponds to the quotient expressed in % between the pulsed infrared absorption signal and the continuous absorption signal.

It has been demonstrated that the dynamic indexes were better than the static indexes to determine the response to the vascular filling. A meta-analysis showed that the dynamic changes of the variables derived from the arterial pressure curve of patients under mechanic ventilation could predict the vascular filling responsiveness with a high specificity and sensibility. The same thing applies to the variables derived from the pulsed oxymetry curves.

Furthermore, monitoring and minimizing, through the vascular filling, the variations of the pulsated arterial pressure (delta PP) induced by the mechanic ventilation during a high risk surgery allows to reduce the postoperative complications and the hospital length of stay. This has not yet been proved for the non invasive parameters (IP and PVI).

The goal of this study is thus to compare a non invasive strategy (based on PVI) to an invasive strategy (based on the deltaPP) of perioperatory filling during abdomino-pelvic interventions (digestive, gynecologic, urologic), in order to test their equivalence and measure their impact in terms of hospital stay.

This record is linked to the NCT02709252 record and share the same cohort of patients.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 80
Est. completion date March 2016
Est. primary completion date March 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Abdominal-pelvic surgery (digestive, gynecologic, urologic) with laparotomy or laparoscopy

- Surgery duration superior to 1 hour

Exclusion Criteria:

- ASA score of 4

- BMI > 35

- supraventricular arrythmia (isolated extrasystoles excepted)

- cardiac insufficiency (F.E < 25 %)

- severe peripheric vascular affections

- severe respiratory affections

- terminal renal insufficiency (creatine clear and < 30 mL/min)

- gelatin allergies

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Geloplasma (PVI)
In the PVI group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the PVI>15% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the PVI remains over 15%.
Geloplasma (delta PP)
In the delta PP group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the delta PP> 13% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the delta PP remains over 13%.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Brugmann University Hospital

References & Publications (5)

Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Holte K, Secher NH, Kehlet H. Monitoring of peri-operative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Mar;51(3):331-40. Review. — View Citation

Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, Delannoy B, Robin J, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Aug;101(2):200-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen133. Epub 2008 Jun 2. — View Citation

Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2642-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da. Review. — View Citation

Michard F, Lopes MR, Auler JO Jr. Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock. Crit Care. 2007;11(3):131. — View Citation

Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, Prasser C, Moritz S, Graf BM, Wiesenack C. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;27(6):555-61. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335fbd1. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Length of hospital stay average of 5 days
Secondary EVA score post surgery pain scoring up to 72 hours
Secondary number of anti-emetics administered up to 72 hours
Secondary length of stay in recovery room up to 24 hours
Secondary First time up First time up/ first time sitting in a chair up to 72 hours