Dodson MK, Magann EF, Meeks GR A randomized comparison of secondary closure and secondary intention in patients with superficial wound dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Sep;80(3 Pt 1):321-4.
Durani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: a reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 May;123(5):1481-1489. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a205de.
Gloster HM Jr The use of second-intention healing for partial-thickness Mohs defects involving the vermilion and/or mucosal surfaces of the lip. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Dec;47(6):893-7.
Luft HS Becoming accountable-opportunities and obstacles for ACOs. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1389-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1009380.
Saap LJ, Falanga V Debridement performance index and its correlation with complete closure of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2002 Nov-Dec;10(6):354-9.
Steed DL Debridement. Am J Surg. 2004 May;187(5A):71S-74S. Review.
Wilcox JR, Carter MJ, Covington S Frequency of debridements and time to heal: a retrospective cohort study of 312 744 wounds. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Sep;149(9):1050-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4960. Erratum in: JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Dec;149(12):1441.
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Outcomes of Secondary Intention Wound Care Methods
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
