Unrecognized Condition — Turkish Adaptation of Romantic Relationship Sabotage Scale Validity and Reliability Study
Citation(s)
Akin, A (2012). Self-handicapping Scale: A study of Validity and Reliability. Education and Science, 37(164): 176-187.
Arazzini Stewart, A , & De Leorge Wolker, L. (2014). Self-handicapping, perfectionism, locus of control and slef-efficacy: a path model. Pers Individ Dif, 66:160-164.
Bowlby, J , (1973). Attachment and Loss: Separation, Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books.
Büyüköztürk, S (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabi (18. baski). Ankara: PegemA Yayincilik.
Büyüksahin, A , & Hovardaoglu, S. (2004). Çiftlerin aska iliskin tutumlarinin Lee'nin çok boyutlu ask biçimleri kapsaminda incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(54), 59-75.
Byrne, B M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
Campbell L, Stanton SC Adult attachment and trust in romantic relationships. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Feb;25:148-151. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
Collins WA, Welsh DP, Furman W Adolescent romantic relationships. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:631-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459.
Conlon, E G., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Creed, P. A., & Tucker, M. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. J Res Read, 29:11-32.
Demir, M (2008). Sweetheart, you really make me happy: Romantic relationship quality and personality as predictors of happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 257-277. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9051-8
Dönmez, A (2009). Yakin iliskiler psikolojisi. Ankara: Nobel Yayin
Epstein, N B. & Baucom, D. H. (2002). Enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for couples: A contextual approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Field, A (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll) (Third edition). London: SAGE Publications Ltd
Fletcher, G J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of Perceived Relationship Quality Components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340-354. doi: 10.1177/0146167200265007
Foster, J J. (2001). A Beginner's Guide Data Analysis. London: Sage.
Fraley RC, Hudson NW, Heffernan ME, Segal N Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Aug;109(2):354-68. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000027.
Gottman, J M. (1993). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Psychology Press
Hair, J F., Arthur H. M., Phillip, S., & Mike, P. Research Methods for Business. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2007. Print.
Hendrick, C , & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402.
Hendrick, C , & Hendrick, S. (1990). 'A Relationship- spesific version of the Love Attitudes Scale'. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 239-254.
Hendrick, S S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic Relationships: Love, Satisfaction, and Staying Together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 980-988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.980
Hendrick, S , Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The relationships assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 15(1), 137-142
Hu, L & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Johnson, S M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection. (2nd ed.). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Jones, E E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). Self-Handicapping Scale [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t09528-000
Karahan, A S. (2021). Consideration of Self-Sabotage Regarding Close Relationships. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(42):1-1.
Kearns, H , Forbes, A., Gardiner, M. L., & Marshall, K. M. (2008). When a high distinction isn't good enough: A review of perfectionism and self-handicapping. Australian Educational Researcher, 35(3):21-36.
Kinnear, P R. & Gray, C. D. (2006). SPSS 14 Made Simple. Oxford: Psychology Press.
Kline, P (2000). An easy guide to factor analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
Lee, J A. (1988). Love-styles. In R.J. Sternberg, M. L. Barnes (Eds), The Psychology of Love. New Haven: Yale University Press
Martin, K A. & Brawley, L. R. (2002). Self-handicapping in physical achievement settings: The contributions of self-esteem and selfefficacy. Self and Identity, 1(4), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106814
Mattingly, B A., & Clark, E. M. (2012). Weakening relationships we try to preserve: Motivated sacrifice, attachment, and relationship quality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(2), 373-386.
Peel R, Caltabiano N The relationship sabotage scale: an evaluation of factor analyses and constructive validity. BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 19;9(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00644-0. Erratum In: BMC Psychol. 2021 Oct 6;9(1):153.
Peel, R , & Caltabiano, N. (2021a). Why do we sabotage love? a thematic analysis of lived experiences of relationship breakdown and maintenance. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 20(2), 99-131. doi: 10.1080/15332691.2020.1795039
Peel, R , Caltabiano, N., Buckby, B., & McBain, K. A. (2019). Defining romantic self-sabotage: A thematic analysis of interviews with practicing psychologists. Journal of Relationship Research, 10(e16), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2019.7
Sagkal, A S., & Özdemir, Y. (2018). Turkish adaptation of perceived romantic relationship quality scale (prrqs): Validity and reliability study. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Education, (46), 22-40.
Slade, R (2020). Relationship Sabotage in Adults with Low Self-Esteem from Attachment Trauma in Childhood. Family Perspectives, 1(1), 11.
Sternberg, R J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119
Stewart, M A. & De George-Walker, L. (2014). Self-handicapping, perfectionism, locus of control and self-efficacy: A path model. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 160-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.038
Tabachnick, B G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Sixth edition). United States: Pearson Education.
Tezbasaran, A (1996), Likert Tipi Ölçek Gelistirme. Psikologlar Dernegi Yayinlari, Ankara.
Yilmaz, B , & Gündüz, B. (2021). The differentiation of self, authenticity and depression as predictors of relationship satisfaction in emerging adulthood. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Education, (58), 334-361.
Turkish Adaptation of Romantic Relationship Sabotage Scale (T-RSS): Validity and Reliability Study
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
