Temporomandibular Disorder — The Association Between Temporomandibular Disorders and Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Citation(s)
Anastassaki Kohler A, Hugoson A, Magnusson T Prevalence of symptoms indicative of temporomandibular disorders in adults: cross-sectional epidemiological investigations covering two decades. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 May;70(3):213-23. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.634832. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
Cattley P, Winyard J, Trevaskis J, Eaton S Validity and reliability of clinical tests for the sacroiliac joint. A review of literature. Australas Chiropr Osteopathy. 2002 Nov;10(2):73-80.
Chinappi AS Jr, Getzoff H Chiropractic/dental cotreatment of lumbosacral pain with temporomandibular joint involvement. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 Nov-Dec;19(9):607-12.
Fink M, Wahling K, Stiesch-Scholz M, Tschernitschek H The functional relationship between the craniomandibular system, cervical spine, and the sacroiliac joint: a preliminary investigation. Cranio. 2003 Jul;21(3):202-8. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2003.11746252.
Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 2001 Feb;81(2):776-88. doi: 10.1093/ptj/81.2.776. Erratum In: Phys Ther. 2008 Jan;88(1):138-9.
Kalamir A, Pollard H, Vitiello A, Bonello R Intra-oral myofascial therapy for chronic myogenous temporomandibular disorders: a randomized, controlled pilot study. J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Sep;18(3):139-46. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712374.
Kiapour A, Joukar A, Elgafy H, Erbulut DU, Agarwal AK, Goel VK Biomechanics of the Sacroiliac Joint: Anatomy, Function, Biomechanics, Sexual Dimorphism, and Causes of Pain. Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 10;14(Suppl 1):3-13. doi: 10.14444/6077. eCollection 2020 Feb.
Laslett M, Aprill CN, McDonald B, Young SB Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Man Ther. 2005 Aug;10(3):207-18. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.01.003.
Laslett M, Young SB, Aprill CN, McDonald B Diagnosing painful sacroiliac joints: A validity study of a McKenzie evaluation and sacroiliac provocation tests. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(2):89-97. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60125-2.
Martin RL, Sekiya JK The interrater reliability of 4 clinical tests used to assess individuals with musculoskeletal hip pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Feb;38(2):71-7. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2677. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
Telli H, Telli S, Topal M The Validity and Reliability of Provocation Tests in the Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Pain Physician. 2018 Jul;21(4):E367-E376.
Tuncer AB, Ergun N, Tuncer AH, Karahan S Effectiveness of manual therapy and home physical therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013 Jul;17(3):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
von Piekartz H, Ludtke K Effect of treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in patients with cervicogenic headache: a single-blind, randomized controlled study. Cranio. 2011 Jan;29(1):43-56. doi: 10.1179/crn.2011.008.
Walker N, Bohannon RW, Cameron D Discriminant validity of temporomandibular joint range of motion measurements obtained with a ruler. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000 Aug;30(8):484-92. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.8.484.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
