Blumenthal J, Haubrich R Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection: how antiretroviral pharmacology helps to monitor and improve adherence. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013 Sep;14(13):1777-85. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.812072. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
de Necker M, de Beer JC, Stander MP, Connell CD, Mwai D Economic and public health impact of decentralized HIV viral load testing: A modelling study in Kenya. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0212972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212972. eCollection 2019.
DePriest AZ, Black DL, Robert TA Immunoassay in healthcare testing applications. J Opioid Manag. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):13-25. doi: 10.5055/jom.2015.0248.
Gandhi M, Greenblatt RM Hair it is: the long and short of monitoring antiretroviral treatment. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Oct 15;137(8):696-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-8-200210150-00016. No abstract available.
Hadland SE, Levy S Objective Testing: Urine and Other Drug Tests. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016 Jul;25(3):549-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
Herzer M, Ramey C, Rohan J, Cortina S Incorporating electronic monitoring feedback into clinical care: a novel and promising adherence promotion approach. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;17(4):505-18. doi: 10.1177/1359104511421103. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
Jacobson K, Ogbuagu O Integrase inhibitor-based regimens result in more rapid virologic suppression rates among treatment-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients compared to non-nucleoside and protease inhibitor-based regimens in a real-world clinical setting: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(43):e13016. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013016.
Marrazzo JM, Scholes D Acceptability of urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic young men: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Nov;35(11 Suppl):S28-33. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31816938ca.
Orrell C, Walensky RP, Losina E, Pitt J, Freedberg KA, Wood R HIV type-1 clade C resistance genotypes in treatment-naive patients and after first virological failure in a large community antiretroviral therapy programme. Antivir Ther. 2009;14(4):523-31.
Pecoraro V, Banfi G, Germagnoli L, Trenti T A systematic evaluation of immunoassay point-of-care testing to define impact on patients' outcomes. Ann Clin Biochem. 2017 Jul;54(4):420-431. doi: 10.1177/0004563217694377. Epub 2017 May 15.
Rutherford GW, Horvath H Dolutegravir Plus Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors versus Efavirenz Plus Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors As Initial Antiretroviral Therapy for People with HIV: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0162775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162775. eCollection 2016.
Van Damme L, Corneli A Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1210464. No abstract available.
Zash R, Makhema J, Shapiro RL Neural-Tube Defects with Dolutegravir Treatment from the Time of Conception. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 6;379(10):979-981. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1807653. Epub 2018 Jul 24. No abstract available.
Urine Tenofovir Point-of-care Test to Identify Patients in Need of ART Adherence Support (UTRA Study)
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.