Citation(s)
- Akihisa Y, Maruyama K, Koyama Y, Yamada R, Ogura A, Andoh T
Comparison of intubation performance between the King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice personnel: a randomized, crossover manikin study. J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1666-9. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
- Metzner J, Posner KL, Lam MS, Domino KB
Closed claims' analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;25(2):263-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.02.007.
- Murphy LD, Kovacs GJ, Reardon PM, Law JA
Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the macintosh laryngoscope. J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
- Woodall NM, Benger JR, Harper JS, Cook TM
Airway management complications during anaesthesia, in intensive care units and in emergency departments in the UK". Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 2(2): 58-64, 2012.
- Yentis SM
Predicting difficult intubation--worthwhile exercise or pointless ritual? Anaesthesia. 2002 Feb;57(2):105-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0003-2409.2001.02515.x. No abstract available.
- Yun BJ, Brown CA 3rd, Grazioso CJ, Pozner CN, Raja AS
Comparison of video, optical, and direct laryngoscopy by experienced tactical paramedics. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):442-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.864356. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
Comparison of King Vision Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Terms of First Pass Intubation Success Rate, Intubation Time, Glottic View Time, and Complications Related to Laryngoscopy
Details for clinical trial NCT02482870