Clinical trial NCT03347136 - References

Respiratory Distress of Newborn — Comparison of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

Citation(s)

•   Armanian AM, Badiee Z, Heidari G, Feizi A, Salehimehr N
  Initial Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Prev Med. 2014
•   Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN
  Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):638-41.
•   Bhandari V
  Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the newborn: review of literature and evidence-based guidelines. J Perinatol. 2010 Aug;30(8):505-12. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.165. Epub 2009 Oct 22. Review. Erratum in: J Perinatol. 2010 Dec;30(12):827.
•   Bisceglia M, Belcastro A, Poerio V, Raimondi F, Mesuraca L, Crugliano C, Corapi UP
  A comparison of nasal intermittent versus continuous positive pressure delivery for the treatment of moderate respiratory syndrome in preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr. 200
•   Claure N, Bancalari E
  New modes of mechanical ventilation in the preterm newborn: evidence of benefit. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Nov;92(6):F508-12. Epub 2007 Sep 5. Review.
•   De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Lemyre B
  Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(1):70-5. Review.
•   DK Guha, editors, Jaypee Brothers
  NNF Recommended Basic Perinatal-Neonatal Nomenclature. Neonatology- Principles and Practice. 1st ed. New Delhi, 1998: 131-2
•   Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, Ramicone E, Chan L, Ramanathan R
  A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubat
•   J Crowther ANNP Updated by Dr Smith
  East Cheshire NHS trust Endotracheal Intubation guide line February 2013 Version 2.0 3
•   Jasani B, Nanavati R, Kabra N, Rajdeo S, Bhandari V
  Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respirator
•   Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, Bhandari V
  A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;10
•   Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D
  Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr. 2007
•   Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, Kirpalani H
  Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2:CD003212. doi:
•   Lemyre B, Laughon M, Bose C, Davis PG
  Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12:CD005384. doi: 10.1002/146
•   Lin CH, Wang ST, Lin YJ, Yeh TF
  Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998 Nov;26(5):349-53.
•   Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, Daniele I, Cavigioli F, Rossi S, Mancuso D, Reali R
  Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial. Arch Dis Chi
•   Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG, Herrmann D
  Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011 Feb;127(2):300-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0922. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
•   Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG
  Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Ap
•   Perinatal society of Sri Lanka in collaborating with WHO collaborating centre for training and research in new born care, All India Institute of Medical Science
  Work book on neonatal ventilation.Learner's guide April 2008.
•   Ramanathan R, Sekar KC, Rasmussen M, Bhatia J, Soll RF
  Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Perinatol. 201
•   Roberts CT, Davis PG, Owen LS
  Neonatal non-invasive respiratory support: synchronised NIPPV, non-synchronised NIPPV or bi-level CPAP: what is the evidence in 2013? Neonatology. 2013;104(3):203-9. doi: 10.1159/000353448. Epub 2013 Aug 28. Review.
•   Sai Sunil Kishore M, Dutta S, Kumar P
  Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2009 Sep;98(9):1412-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01348.x. Epub 2
•   Santin R, Brodsky N, Bhandari V
  A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). J Peri
•   Wood FE, Gupta S, Tin W, Sinha S
  Randomised controlled trial of synchronised intermittent positive airway pressure (SiPAP) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory dist

Comparison of CPAP and NIPPV as a Mode of Non-invasive Respiratory Support for Neonates in a Level III NICU

Details for clinical trial NCT03347136