Rectal Cancer — Complete Pathologic Response Rectal Cancers
Citation(s)
Al-Sukhni E, Attwood K, Mattson DM, Gabriel E, Nurkin SJ Predictors of Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;23(4):1177-86. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5017-y. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
Austin PC A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2037-49. Review.
Chen X, Deane NG, Lewis KB, Li J, Zhu J, Washington MK, Beauchamp RD Comparison of Nanostring nCounter® Data on FFPE Colon Cancer Samples and Affymetrix Microarray Data on Matched Frozen Tissues. PLoS One. 2016 May 13;11(5):e0153784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153784. eCollection 2016.
Ellervik C, Vaught J Preanalytical variables affecting the integrity of human biospecimens in biobanking. Clin Chem. 2015 Jul;61(7):914-34. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.228783. Epub 2015 May 15. Review.
Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):918-28. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8702. Epub 2012 Feb 23. Review.
MERCURY Study Group Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ. 2006 Oct 14;333(7572):779. Epub 2006 Sep 19.
Ryan JE, Warrier SK, Lynch AC, Heriot AG Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Oct;17(10):849-61. doi: 10.1111/codi.13081. Review.
Ryan JE, Warrier SK, Lynch AC, Ramsay RG, Phillips WA, Heriot AG Predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar;18(3):234-46. doi: 10.1111/codi.13207. Review.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
Tanis E, Caballero C, Collette L, Verleye L, den Dulk M, Lacombe D, Schuhmacher C, Werutsky G The European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) strategy for quality assurance in surgical clinical research: Assessment of the past and moving towards the future. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;42(8):1115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.04.052. Epub 2016 Apr 27. Review.
Wan J, Liu K, Zhu J, Li G, Zhang Z Implications for selecting local excision in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation. Oncotarget. 2015 May 10;6(13):11714-22.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.