Baker LC, Atlas SW, Afendulis CC Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measuring value. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1467-78. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1467.
Barnett S, Jones SC, Bennett S, Iverson D, Bonney A General practice training and virtual communities of practice - a review of the literature. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Aug 21;13:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-87. Review.
Berdahl CT, Vermeulen MJ, Larson DB, Schull MJ Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;62(5):486-494.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 May 14.
Bishop TF, Federman AD, Keyhani S Physicians' views on defensive medicine: a national survey. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 28;170(12):1081-3. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.155.
Boyle A, Santarius L, Maimaris C Evaluation of the impact of the Canadian CT head rule on British practice. Emerg Med J. 2004 Jul;21(4):426-8.
Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Graham ID Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-spine rule. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;13(4):413-20. Epub 2006 Mar 10.
Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Visentin L, Graham ID Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):948-56. Epub 2005 Sep 15.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84. Review.
Brenner DJ, Hricak H Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate? JAMA. 2010 Jul 14;304(2):208-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.973.
Harnan SE, Pickering A, Pandor A, Goodacre SW Clinical decision rules for adults with minor head injury: a systematic review. J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1):245-51. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820d090f. Review.
Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 13;343(2):94-9. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 2001 Feb 8;344(6):464.
Miller P, Kendrick D, Bentley E, Fielding K Cost-effectiveness of lumbar spine radiography in primary care patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Oct 15;27(20):2291-7.
Perry JJ, Stiell IG Impact of clinical decision rules on clinical care of traumatic injuries to the foot and ankle, knee, cervical spine, and head. Injury. 2006 Dec;37(12):1157-65. Epub 2006 Oct 31. Review.
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
