Psychotic Disorders — Examining Strategy Monitoring and Remediation Training
Citation(s)
Best MW, Bowie CR A review of cognitive remediation approaches for schizophrenia: from top-down to bottom-up, brain training to psychotherapy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2017 Jul;17(7):713-723. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2017.1331128. Epub 2017 May 24. Review.
Best MW, Gale D, Tran T, Haque MK, Bowie CR Brief executive function training for individuals with severe mental illness: Effects on EEG synchronization and executive functioning. Schizophr Res. 2019 Jan;203:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.052. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
Best MW, Milanovic M, Iftene F, Bowie CR A Randomized Controlled Trial of Executive Functioning Training Compared With Perceptual Training for Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Effects on Neurophysiology, Neurocognition, and Functioning. Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;176(4):297-306. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18070849. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, Parkes KR The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol. 1982 Feb;21(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.x.
Cacioppo JT, Petty RE The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982; 42: 116-131.
Eack SM, Hogarty GE, Cho RY, Prasad KM, Greenwald DP, Hogarty SS, Keshavan MS Neuroprotective effects of cognitive enhancement therapy against gray matter loss in early schizophrenia: results from a 2-year randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;67(7):674-82. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.63. Epub 2010 May 3.
Eack SM, Newhill CE Psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2007 Sep;33(5):1225-37. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
Faustman WO, Overall JE (1999). Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (p. 791-830). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Llerena K, Park SG, McCarthy JM, Couture SM, Bennett ME, Blanchard JJ The Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR): reliability and validity of a self-report measure of negative symptoms. Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;54(5):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
Palmer BA, Pankratz VS, Bostwick JM The lifetime risk of suicide in schizophrenia: a reexamination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;62(3):247-53.
Ruse SA, Harvey PD, Davis VG, Atkins AS, Fox KH, Keefe RS Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment In Schizophrenia: Preliminary Data Regarding Feasibility and Correlations with Cognitive and Functional Capacity Performance. Schizophr Res Cogn. 2014 Mar;1(1):e21-e26.
Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
Weissman AN, Beck AT Development and validation of the dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A preliminary investigation. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy; Chicago. 1978.
Wykes T, Spaulding WD Thinking about the future cognitive remediation therapy--what works and could we do better? Schizophr Bull. 2011 Sep;37 Suppl 2:S80-90. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr064. Review.
E-SMART: Examining Strategy Monitoring and Remediation Training for Schizophrenia
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
