Moller A, Olsson H, Gronberg H, Eklund M, Aly M, Nordstrom T The Stockholm3 blood-test predicts clinically-significant cancer on biopsy: independent validation in a multi-center community cohort. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Mar;22(1):137-142. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0082-5. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Moyer VA; U S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459.
Pepe MS, Alonzo TA Comparing disease screening tests when true disease status is ascertained only for screen positives. Biostatistics. 2001 Sep;2(3):249-60. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/2.3.249.
Potts JM, Lutz M, Walker E, Modlin C, Klein E Trends in PSA, age and prostate cancer detection among black and white men from 1990-2006 at a tertiary care center. Cancer. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3910-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25124.
Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, van der Kwast T, Kummerlin IP, Kweldam CF, van Leenders GJLH Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth. Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.033. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
Strom P, Nordstrom T, Aly M, Egevad L, Gronberg H, Eklund M The Stockholm-3 Model for Prostate Cancer Detection: Algorithm Update, Biomarker Contribution, and Reflex Test Potential. Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
Vigneswaran HT, Discacciati A, Gann PH, Gronberg H, Eklund M, Abern MR Ethnic variation in prostate cancer detection: a feasibility study for use of the Stockholm3 test in a multiethnic U.S. cohort. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Mar;24(1):120-127. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0250-2. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
SEPTA Trial: Stockholm3 Validation Study in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort for ProsTAte Cancer
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.
